Kish Collections

Communist War Plan - Sun Tzu Strategy

2011-10-19T20:45:00.000-05:00

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) -- "China has pledged in secret to back a euro-zone bailout that will include investments in infrastructure and sovereign debt, the U.K.'s Sunday Times reported. The paper cited sources close to the G20 group of nations' talks in Paris which it didn't identify. In exchange for the backing, China is seeking additional commitments on budget cuts and structural reforms among member nations of the currency bloc, the report said. China had indicated its willingness to invest "tens of billions" by purchasing infrastructure assets from financially ailing states, while Chinese banks would increase purchases of sovereign debt, the report said. 'China wants to be sure that Europe knows the size of the hole and that it won't get any bigger before they agree to fill it in,' The Sunday Times cited one source close to the talks as saying."

"It's money comrade" - image by (pnoeric)

If you are interested in digging deeper:

Google The Unconsidered Enemy.

Google China Buys Texas.

Google History of Communist Atrocities

Google Victims of Communism

Google Marx & satan by Wurmbrand

Google Sun Tzu's Art of War

"Better to subdue a country intact than to destroy it completely. The damage caused makes victory less impressive because the skillful, conquer without a fight. Those who win battle after battle do not have supreme skill. Those who have supreme skill, use strategy to bend others without coming to conflict. The best plan is to win by strategy and capture without siege and victory without prolonged warfare. Uproot fortifications without attacking and absorbing organizations without prolonged operations. Those who are skillful in executing strategy fight in many areas to win; politics, diplomacy, scheme, economics, military, and ensure victory without fighting."
~Sun Tzu (496+ BC)

Additional headlines related to Communist China's war preparations:

Project 60: China Buying Idaho?
http://www.commentso...a-buying-idaho/

Will Chinese investors buy the Dodgers?
http://sports.yahoo....lug=ycn-9062463

China Wants to Buy Facebook
http://nation.foxnew...ts-buy-facebook

CHINA STEEL TO BUY STAKES IN AUST MINES
http://www.thebull.c...aust-mines.html

Hu's Your Daddy?
http://jnkish.blogsp...your-daddy.html

HU'S YOUR DADDY? - MEDIA MONTAGE
http://jnkish.blogsp...ia-montage.html

China Plants Flag on Constitution Avenue
http://jnkish.blogsp...nstitution.html

10 Facts That Prove Big Sis Is Wrong, Drudge Is Right

2011-09-06T21:46:00.002-05:00

Homeland Security has been caught lying again and again about airport security in a bid to undermine genuine privacy concerns

SOURCE: Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Janet Napolitano’s contention that Matt Drudge is “just wrong” about privacy worries surrounding airport screening technology is completely at odds with the facts, which illustrate how the DHS has been caught time and time again lying about both privacy and health issues in a transparent ploy to undermine genuine concerns.

“I think that what he means is we are watching too much—kind of an Orwellian view. He’s just wrong. I mean, he’s just wrong,” Napolitano told Politico, labeling privacy concerns “overblown”.

A quick fact check however shows that it’s Napolitano who is “just wrong”. The DHS has repeatedly lied about the privacy and health threats posed by naked body scanners in an effort to keep the controversy under wraps, as well as withholding evidence.

- Privacy concerns were completely justified after a recent release under the Freedom of Information Act of DHS plans for the mass rollout of mobile body scanners, documents which were largely redacted, with entire pages having been blacked out by the agency.

- Before the agency was forced to roll out new “stick man” software upgrades, to deflect genuine privacy concerns, the DHS simply lied about the fact that the scanners produced naked images of the body which showed genitalia in crisp detail.

- When the agency was finally forced to admit that the scanners do produce naked images, they then claimed that it was not a privacy concern because such images could not be printed or saved in any way. This claim was exposed as yet another act of mass public deception when documents emerged confirming that the U.S. Marshals Service had surreptitiously saved thousands of naked images from a scanner at the security checkpoint of a single Florida courthouse. The Electronic Privacy Information Center also obtained documents from the DHS showing that the machines used by the department’s TSA screeners are not only able to record and store naked body images, but that they are mandated to do so.

- In claiming that the body scanners were safe, DHS cited a study by Johns Hopkins University. This was a complete lie. In reality, Dr Michael Love, who runs an X-ray lab at the department of biophysics and biophysical chemistry at the Johns Hopkins school of medicine, concluded that “statistically someone is going to get skin cancer from these X-rays”.

- In brushing aside radiation concerns, Big Sis also completely ignored the warnings of numerous highly respected scientific bodies and academic authorities that the scanners posed serious health risks, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, and the University of California. When a “cluster” of cancer cases developed amongst TSA screeners at Boston Logan, the TSA attempted to cover up the story.

- Big Sis was also caught lying about the level of radiation emitted by the scanners. Scientists at Columbia University found that the dose emitted by the naked x-ray devices could be up to 20 times higher than originally estimated, likely contributing to an increase in a common type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma which affects the head and neck.

- For those who refuse to go through the scanners on privacy or health grounds, the notorious TSA pat down has also been repeatedly mischaracterized and lied about by the TSA in a bid to downplay a privacy furore. Napolitano herself claimed that the pat-downs were discreet, yet hundreds upon hundreds of accounts and reports of travelers being harassed constantlyprove otherwise. At one stage the TSA even tried to claim that no squeezing or groping whatsoever was taking place, even as reports of people literally having their genitals grabbed poured in.

- The TSA was also caught lying about subjecting children to pat downs in yet another transparent ploy to undermine genuine privacy concerns. In April, the TSA defended the groping of a 6 year-old girl, saying it followed policy. Yet in November 2010, the agency had vowed to conduct no ‘enhanced’ pat-downs for children under 12.

- Napolitano’s attempt to dismiss the “Orwellian” nature of how the DHS operates in the context of airport security is noticeably absent the fact that journalists who have been critical of Homeland Security have found their names being placed on a terror watchlist, people like CNN reporter Drew Griffin.

- Indeed, anyone who opposes minimum wage criminally-inclined morons who would struggle to hold down a job flipping burgers fondling their kids has officially been labeled a “domestic extremist” by the TSA in its own memo. It doesn’t get much more “Orwellian” than that.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.

David Icke - Taking Responsibility - Some But Not All Truth Absent Jesus

2011-07-31T20:51:00.001-05:00

The poster of this video (quickparser) says:

The vibes we put out, attract the same back to us, sooner or later. The whole Illuminati game of human control is manipulating and implanting Humanity's imagination of itself (subconscious imagination of itself), and that then becomes our conscious reality - the matrix. If we want to change our reality, our lives and the world, then we must change ourselves.

In this video, David Icke (whether he knows it or not) touches on the "born again" experience.

"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new" (2 Corinthians 5:17 KJV).

At 2:24 in the video, David talks about "an awakening" and "another level" within himself. If he, or anyone reading this, wants to go all the way into the truth and the light; the guaranteed way for humans is to accept Jesus into our hearts and shed ourselves forever of satan's deceptive "conscious reality".

It is known that the Illuminati are born of satan. And Jesus explains: "The time for judging this world has come, when satan, the ruler of this world, will be cast out" (John 12:27 NLT). Jesus has all power and authority. From Jesus, satan has no choice but to flee. When we believe in Jesus, He transfers this power to us. So on this point, David Icke is almost right. We have the ability to take power back. However, true power isn't our power - it is the power of God.

Discovering the power of Jesus is to believe in Him and accept Him into our heart. The transforming power of His Holy Spirit then affects change as described by Icke in this video - and much more. To learn for ourselves - we simply need to study and follow the four spiritual laws.

If we have Christ in our hearts, we have His power over evil. This is almost what Icke is beginning to understand and explain through this message, except Icke does not mention Christ. Quickparser is also almost right when he says: "If we want to change our reality, our lives and the world, then we must change ourselves." God has granted us the authority to make our own decisions. But the power of true transformation doesn't come from within ourselves. It comes from the "rulers and authorities of the unseen world" (Ephesians 6:12 NLT). We have to be careful of the source of our power. We must make absolutely sure it is Jesus - else we are deceived.

The Apostle Paul explains: "Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ. For in Christ lives all the fullness of God in a human body. So you also are complete through your union with Christ, who is the head over every ruler and authority" (Colossians 2:8-10 NLT).

May God bless and Jesus be with each of us throughout our new spiritual beginnings.

This video was recently featured on Activist Post.

Pray We Awake Before It's Too Late - Executive Order 13575 Rural Councils and United Nations Agenda 21

2011-06-28T21:52:00.000-05:00

Many of us are in a slumber. It's as if a spell has been cast. If you are a praying person, please join with me in intercession.

Father God - I pray for an awakening of Your people. I pray the deceptions of those who seek to lord over us are revealed. Please expose all lies and cast all evil into the outer darkness. Father God we need boldness to stand against the enemy. We seek the power of Your Holy Spirit. I pray that each of us shall repent now and turn to You - the one true God. Help each of us grow in your precious name Christ Jesus. We seek to honor You in everything that we do. Amen.

Now that our hearts and minds are prepared, let's move on to the happenings of the world.

President Obama Executive Order 13575 Rural Councils

On June 9, 2011, President Obama issued a sweeping executive order for a White House Rural Council that purports to exert broad municipal powers over the food, fiber, and energy production of Rural America.

The Russians executed similar schemes in the early 1900's.

Related excerpts from "Russia, Communism, and the Future of the World" by Fr. Robert J. Fox --

...This group intended to dominate the people. Through lies, and false promises of peace, bread, and land, they won the support of many people. They claimed that property and wealth should be taken from the minority, who owned it, and divided among the common people. However, the Communists' real goal was that the people would have no property and no freedom and the state, in effect, would become god...

They... seized all private property, and declared Lenin head of the new Communist government.
...though only a relatively small number of Russia's people were Bolsheviks — the 175 million people of Russia were under their control and representative government, which had been promised, was not to be. The Communist insurgents took over all newspapers and henceforth only the Communist line could be publicized.

The peasants had to work on 'collective farms,' owned by the Communist state, or in factories. Some who attempted to work their own farms and resist their Communist takeover were either shot to death on Stalin's orders or transported to Siberia for slave labor in prison camps.

If you aren't alarmed yet, take a look at the Executive order in the context of United Nations Agenda 21.

Obama Signs Agenda 21-Related Executive Order by Raven Clabough -

..the Executive Order [13575 Rural Councils] seems to be in line with the United Nations radical Agenda 21, as it is designed “to begin taking control over almost all aspects of the lives of 16 percent of the American people.”

Agenda 21 For Dummies

It is clear to me now that only God can save the United States of America. Please, for the sake of our country, take time every day to repent and pray.

Americans Are Living In 1984

2011-05-09T22:19:00.000-05:00

by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
GlobalResearch.ca

The White House’s “death of bin Laden” story has come apart at the seams. Will it make any difference that before 48 hours had passed the story had changed so much that it no longer bore any resemblance to President Obama’s Sunday evening broadcast and has lost all credibility?

So far it has made no difference to the once-fabled news organization, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), which on March 9, eight days later, is still repeating the propaganda that the SEALs killed bin Laden in his Pakistani compound, where bin Laden lived next door to the Pakistani Military Academy surrounded by the Pakistani army.

Not even the president of Pakistan finds the story implausible. The BBC reports that the president is launching a full-scale investigation of how bin Laden managed to live for years in an army garrison town without being noticed.

For most Americans the story began and ended with four words: “we got bin Laden.” The celebrations, the sweet taste of revenge, of triumph and victory over “the most dangerous man on the planet” are akin to the thrill experienced by sports fans when their football team defeats the unspeakable rival or their baseball team wins the World Series. No fan wants to hear the next day that it is not so, that it is all a mistake. If these Americans years from now come across a story that the killing of bin Laden was an orchestrated news event to boost other agendas, they will dismiss the report as the ravings of a pinko-liberal-commie.

Everyone knows we killed bin Laden. How could it be otherwise? We--the indispensable people, the virtuous nation, the world’s only superpower, the white hats-- were destined to prevail. No other outcome was possible.

No one will notice that those who fabricated the story forgot to show the kidney dialysis machine that, somehow, kept bin Laden alive for a decade. No doctors were on the premises.

No one will remember that Fox News reported in December, 2001, that Osama bin Laden had passed away from his illnesses.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

If bin Laden beat all odds and managed to live another decade to await, unarmed and undefended, the arrival of the Navy SEALS last week, how it is possible that the “terror mastermind,” who defeated not merely the CIA and FBI, but all 16 US intelligence agencies along with those of America’s European allies and Israel, the National Security Council, the Pentagon, NORAD, Air Traffic Control, airport security four times on the same morning, etc. etc., never enjoyed another success, not even a little, very minor one? What was the “terror mastermind” doing for a decade after 9/11?

The “death of bin Laden” serves too many agendas that cover the political spectrum for the obvious falsity of the story to be recognized by very many. Patriots are euphoric that America won over bin Laden. Progressives have seized on the story to excoriate the United States for extra-judicial murder that brutalizes us all. Some on the left-wing bought into the 9/11 story because of the emotional satisfaction they received from oppressed Arabs striking back at their imperialist oppressors. These left-wingers are delighted that it took the incompetent Americans an entire decade to find bin Laden, who was hiding in plain view. The American incompetence in finding bin Laden simply, in their minds, proves the incompetence of the US government, which failed to protect Americans against the 9/11 attack.

Those who ordered, and those who wrote, totally incompetent legal memos that torture was permissible under US and international law, thereby setting up George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for the possibility of prosecution, are riding the euphoria of bin Laden’s death by declaring that it was torture that led the American assassins to bin Laden. All of a sudden, torture, which had fallen back into the disrepute in which it had been for centuries, is again in the clear. Anything that leads to the elimination of bin Laden is a valid instrument.

Those, who want to increase the pressure on Pakistan to shut up about Americans murdering Pakistani citizens in Pakistan from the air and from troops on the ground, have gained a new club with which to beat the Pakistani government into submission: “you hid bin Laden from us.”

Those who want to continue to fatten the profits of the military/security complex and the powers of Homeland Security, such as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, use bin Laden’s second, or ninth, death as proof that America is being successful in its war on terror and that the war must continue on such a successful path until all enemies are slain.

Most ominous of all was the statement by the CIA director that bin Laden’s death would lead to new attacks on America and new 9/11s from al Qaeda seeking revenge. This warning, issued within a few hours of President Obama’s Sunday evening address, telegraphed the inevitable “al Qaeda” Internet posting that America would suffer new 9/11s for killing their leader.

If the Taliban knew in December 2001 that bin Laden was dead, does anyone think that al Qaeda didn’t know it? Indeed, no member of the public has any way of knowing if al Qaeda is anything more than a bogyman organization created by the CIA which issues “al Qaeda” announcements. The evidence that al Qaeda’s announcements are issued by the CIA is very strong. The various videos of bin Laden for the last nine years have been shown by experts to be fakes. Why would bin Laden issue a fake video? Why did bin Laden cease issuing videos and only issue audios? A person running a world-wide terrorist organization should be able to produce videos. He would also be surrounded by better protectors than a couple of women. Where was al Qaeda, which according to former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld, consists of “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the earth.” Had these most dangerous men alive abandoned their leader?

The CIA director’s warning of future terrorist attacks, followed by a suspect “al Qaeda” threat of the same, suggests that if the American public continues to lose its enthusiasm for the governments open-ended wars, which are conducted at the expense of the US budget deficit, the dollar’s exchange value, inflation, Social Security, Medicare, income support programs, jobs, recovery, and so forth, “al Qaeda” will again outwit all 16 US intelligence agencies, those of our allies, NORAD, airport security, Air Traffic Control, etc. etc., and inflict the world’s only superpower with another humiliating defeat that will invigorate American support for “the war on terror.”

I believe that “al Qaeda” could blow up the White House or Congress or both and that the majority of Americans would fall for the story, just as the Germans, a better educated and more intelligent population, fell for the Reichstag Fire--as did a number of historians.

The reason I say this is that Americans have succumbed to propaganda that has conditioned them to believe that they are under attack by practically omnipotent adversaries. Proof of this is broadcast every day. For example, on March 9, I heard over National Public Radio in Atlanta that Emory University, a private university of some distinction, treated its 3,500 graduating class to a commencement address by Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security.

This is the agency that has goons feeling the genitals of young children and adults and which has announced that it intends to expand this practice from air travelers to shopping malls, bus and train stations. That a serious university invited such a low-lifer, who clearly has no respect for American civil liberty and is devoid of any sort of sense of what is appropriate, to address a graduating class of southern elite is a clear indication that the Ministry of Truth has prevailed. Americans are living in George Orwell’s 1984.

For those who haven’t read Orwell’s classic prediction of our time, Big Brother, the government, could tell the “citizens” any lie and it was accepted unquestioningly. As a perceptive reader pointed out to me, we Americans, with our “free press,” are at this point today: “What is really alarming is the increasingly arrogant sloppiness of these lies, as though the government has become so profoundly confident of its ability to deceive people that they make virtually no effort to even appear credible.”

A people as gullible as Americans have no future.

Paul Craig Roberts is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

Rest In Peace - Reverend David Wilkerson

2011-04-30T02:30:00.001-05:00

Rev. David Wilkerson

May 19, 1931 - April 27, 2011

Information from David's World Challenge Web Site:

Today, April 27, 2011 David Wilkerson went to be with Jesus. We are receiving many inquiries and wanted to confirm the fact that he has passed away in a fatal car accident. We appreciate your prayers and our hearts are sorrowful, yet we rejoice at the joy of knowing David Wilkerson spent his life well. —The Wilkerson Family

Funeral Service: Texas - Monday, May 2
Memorial Service: New York - Saturday, May 14th

Information from David's Blog:

FRIDAY, APRIL 29, 2011
by Gary Wilkerson

“David served the purposes of God in his generation, then he died” (Acts 13:36).

On Wednesday afternoon my father, David Wilkerson, passed away in a car accident. We grieve the loss of a beloved father, a faithful husband and a holy man of God. My mother, Gwen, his wife of 57 years, was in the car also, but we are told she will recover fully.

Dad’s 60-plus years of ministry have impacted the lives of those closest to him and extended to millions around the world. Today we feel a personal loss, but at the same time we rejoice knowing Dad lived life to the fullest, obeying God with devotion and loving Jesus radically.

He was known for his unlimited faith. He believed God could change the lives of gang members and transform the most desperate drug addicts. He believed that a dynamic church could be launched in the heart of Times Square, New York City. He believed he could be a man who loved his wife and children well. And he did.

Dad was not one for fanfare, acclaim or ceremony. He turned down invitations to meet with world leaders yet would give everything he owned to support a poor orphan or a widow in distress.

Like King David of old, Dad served God’s purposes in his generation. He preached with uncompromising passion and relentless grace. He wrote with amazing insight, clarity and conviction. He ran his race well and when his work was done, he was called home.

I don’t think my father would have retired well. I don’t think he was one to sit in a rocking chair and reminisce about times past. I believe that Jesus, knowing this, graciously called him home.

Dad’s last mission on earth was to be an advocate for the poorest of the poor—to provide relief and support for hungry children and widows and orphans. After founding Teen Challenge, World Challenge and Times Square Church, he sought to feed starving children in the most impoverished countries in the world. Today, Please Pass the Bread is saving the lives of thousands of children, through 56 outreaches in 8 countries.

Like King David of old, after having served God’s purpose, he died. I know if my father were able to encourage you with his words today, he would invite you to give your all to Jesus, to love God deeply and to give yourself away to the needs of others.

The works he began outlive him. We can all attest to his impacting us—not only in his preaching, writing and founding of world-changing ministries, but in his love, devotion, compassion and ability to stir our faith for greater works.

David Wilkerson wrote the following message. This message has touched my heart.

The Towers Have Fallen But We Missed the Message
by David Wilkerson | October 8, 2001

Additional commentary regarding "The Towers Have Fallen" message can be viewed HERE.

For a glimpse of Rev. David Wilkerson's true passion for Christ - watch the following video "A Call to Anguish". Credit - The WatchMen from Israel on the Wall.

"True joy comes out of anguish". ~Rev. David Wilkerson

Thank you David for your service to Our Lord and Savior - Jesus Christ. My prayers are with your family and our nation. God speed.

Low-Tax States Woo Caterpillar Exit From Illinois

2011-03-27T08:00:00.001-05:00

In January, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signed into law a significant income tax increase. Since then, according to a report by Kurt Erickson of Pantagraph.com - Wisconsin, Indiana and New Jersey have attempted to "poach companies" out of Illinois. But specifically, Caterpillar CEO Doug Oberhelman "said he's being actively courted to move (Caterpillar)". The Erickson report includes correspondence from the Governors of Texas, South Dakota and Nebraska.

"I stand ready to help convince you to relocate or expand in the fiscally conservative, low-tax Lone Star State," wrote Texas Gov. Rick Perry in a Jan. 24 letter.

CAT Tractor - photo by JAXPORT

Author and blogger John Lott writes: "Caterpillar is an Illinois institution. If the company leaves the state, it will be a big blow. It would be interesting to see how much increased tax revenue Illinois is actually going to get from this tax increase."

John is underestimating the impact. The tax increase is already a big blow. However, a Caterpillar move would likely trigger a devastating industrial exodus. Even before the latest tax hike, few right-minded manufacturing companies were seeking to locate in Illinois. If Caterpillar moves, the prospect of new manufacturing will completely dry up and the plants that are left will race for the exits - if they aren't already doing so.

This story appears to have been first published on the web site of a local Bloomington, IL newspaper - Pantagraph.com

Caterpillar CEO's letter talks of leaving Illinois
By Kurt Erickson

The chairman and CEO of Peoria-based Caterpillar Inc. is raising the specter of moving the heavy equipment maker out of Illinois.

In a letter sent March 21 to Gov. Pat Quinn, Caterpillar chief executive officer Doug Oberhelman said officials in at least four other states have approached the company about relocating since Illinois raised its income tax in January.

"I want to stay here. But as the leader of this business, I have to do what's right for Caterpillar when making decisions about where to invest," Oberhelman wrote in the letter obtained Friday by the Lee Enterprises Springfield bureau. "The direction that this state is headed in is not favorable to business and I'd like to work with you to change that."
Oberhelman said he's being actively courted to move.

"I have been called, 'cornered' in meetings and 'wined and dined' -- the heat is on," Oberhelman wrote. "Before, I never really considered living anywhere else and certainly never considered the possibility of Caterpillar relocating. But I have to admit, the policymakers in Springfield seem to make it harder by the day."

Cat spokesman Jim Dugan said the letter was designed to show Quinn that Oberhelman wants to be involved in finding solutions that benefit the company, which employs 23,000 people in Illinois.

The entire story is available at Pantagraph.com

Pentagon Report Predicts Phase Three Economic Attack

2011-03-02T06:36:00.007-06:00

An unclassified 2009 Pentagon contractor report “Economic Warfare: Risks and Responses” by financial analyst Kevin D. Freeman is the focus of an important article by Bill Gertz. The Gertz article, "Financial terrorism suspected in 2008 economic crash", appeared in the Monday edition of The Washington Times. Although most of the Gertz article focuses on "the first two phases", the most important information for us today is the prediction of the "PHASE THREE ATTACK":

The Pentagon report states that the evidence of financial subversion revealed that the first two phases of an attack on the U.S. economy took place from 2007 to 2009 and “based on recent global market activity, it appears that the predicted Phase III may be underway right now.”

The entire one hundred and eleven page report is available online at here at Scribd. The key section entitled "Phase Three: Collapse the Dollar, Bankrupt the Treasury" appears on page 66.

Based on the assumed nature of Phase One and Phase Two, a Phase Three attack would likely involve dumping of U.S. Treasuries and a trashing of the dollar, removing it from reserve currency status. This is clearly foreseeable as a risk and even could float under the cover of a natural outcome in much the same way that Phases One and Two potentially have been hidden.

The implications are extremely serious. If the dollar were not the reserve currency, there would be a mass dumping of Treasury instruments by foreign holders. Treasury interest rates would skyrocket, further worsening the annual deficits due to sharply higher interest payments on expanding debts. The Treasury would have to raise taxes dramatically, further dampening growth or the Federal Reserve would be forced to monetize the debt, worsening inflation concerns. Pushed to the limit, could the U.S. dollar would follow the path of the German currency in Weimar Germany following defeat in World War I.

This scenario in the 2009 report is very similar to that now being laid out by Porter Stansberry

and separately by Lindsey Williams

Related Posts -
Quantitative Easing and World War
Expletive Spewing Robots Expose Federal Reserve
The Federal Reserve Is Owned By Private Banks - Did you know?

UPDATE - Glen Beck's coverage of the Phase Three Attack

FOX News CPAC Hoax is Political MindWar

2011-02-18T19:28:00.003-06:00

Conservatives are long-accustomed to liberal media spin. It's something that we know exists and most of us can pick up on it in the blink of an eye. In fact, many of us are conditioned to the point that we can no longer bear the mental and spiritual anguish of watching the so called "news" as "reported" by CNN and MSNBC. That is -- without physically shouting at our television screens. However, now we are faced with an even more daunting challenge of mind and spirit.

Recently, our mainstream media darling (FOX News) has been caught red-handed committing CNN-like fraud against one of our own.

The article “Fox News Caught In Ron Paul Dirty Tricks,” by Paul Joseph Watson offers conclusive proof of the FOX News CPAC Hoax.

In a shocking act of mass public deception, Fox News attempted to skew Ron Paul’s 2011 CPAC straw poll win by representing it with footage from the previous year’s CPAC event, at which Mitt Romney supporters had loudly booed the result, another example of the continuing dirty tricks campaign being waged against Paul by the establishment media.

For a quick comparison, jump to 4:38 in the video to watch the actual audience reaction. Any doubters that remain after viewing the Paul Joseph Watson article and embedded videos are encouraged to listen to the in-depth monologue “FOX News CPAC Hoax Analysis,” by Alex Jones.

So, what should an honest conservative do with this knowledge?

First of all, we must face the blunt truth. Anyone who chooses to ignore this information logically falls into at least one of the following three camps -- apathetic fool, coward, or fellow traveler. Those who remain need to understand why the FOX News organization would take the time and energy to defraud its loyal customers.

Clearly, it takes a coordinated effort to produce a video in this way. Someone likely gave the production crew the order to create the falsified clip. Someone likely coordinated and approved the airing of the falsified clip. Someone likely instructed the reporters to ask Ron Paul to comment on the falsified clip.

However, in order to arrive at the coordinated effort, someone at the top of FOX News first had to come to the personal conclusion NOT TO ALLOW their organization to promote Ron Paul’s straw poll victory. Furthermore, they had to be so convicted in their conclusion as to develop a premeditated plan of action. They also had to be high enough on the food chain to make it all happen. This was a highly deceptive plan of action. It was not only designed to obscure the straw poll victory. It was set up to actively smear the candidate both with a fraudulent video and an accompanying “news” report.

To understand the effort is to understand the motive. Ron Paul is the only conservative candidate who is willing and able to stand up to the private Federal Reserve.

In his book “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” Daniel Estulin writes about FOX News and the private Federal Reserve (excerpts from pages 94 and 95):

FOX News Channel, part of the FOX network, is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who owns a significant portion of the world's media. His network has close ties to the Republican Party and among his "fair and balanced" commentators is Newt Gingrich, former GOP Republican House speaker. Murdoch, needless to say, is a luminary in the secret Bilderberg Group. He has most recently added the Wall Street Journal to his empire.

In the United States, the "independent" banking system is known as the Federal Reserve System, a privately owned bank system interlocked with the Bilderbergers. In Europe, the independent banking system is run through the European Central Bank, whose monetary policies are put together by the leading members of the Bilderberg elite.

Armed with this knowledge -- the motive is clear.

This fraud is no small matter. It’s a rare proof of conspiracy. It’s proof of a hoax perpetrated by the FOX News organization to steal support from the leading conservative presidential candidate. It’s an effort to shape your views. It’s a direct effort from the top echelon to form your opinion -- for you. It’s MindWar waged on the political front. The true aim of MindWar is described by Michael Aquino in his 2003 pamphlet “From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory.”

You seize control of all the means by which his government and populace process information to make up their minds, and you adjust it so that those minds are made up as you desire.

Do the research. Voice your outrage. Resistance is victory.

In my experience... by Robert A. Hall

2011-02-18T05:52:00.000-06:00

In my experience, moral courage is as important as physical courage, and is needed by everyone. It’s also in much shorter supply.

In my experience, women can be beautiful, pretty or cute. A pretty woman can also be cute, and a beautiful woman would likely qualify as pretty, but not necessarily the other way around. I don’t know how to define these states of being, but I know it when I see it. And on the whole, I prefer cute.

In my experience, when someone says, “It’s not the money, it’s the principle”—it’s the money.

In my experience, the more focused on self a person is, the less happy that person is.

In my experience, bad politicians get elected because we like the bad policies they promise us for our own short term gain.

In my experience, voters want lower taxes, but they also want more spending in any area they care about, especially if it benefits them personally. Which is why government is frequently in fiscal crisis.

In my experience, un-earned self esteem does more harm than good. It creates “praise junkies,” who expect endless compliments on the flimsiest of pretexts. “Good boy, John—you got your socks on the right feet.” “Nice outfit, Mary—it almost matches.”

In my experience, parents, teachers and bosses who praise mediocre performance get more mediocre performance.

Mr. Hall has much more experience to share - read the rest of it at "The Old Jarhead" blog.

HANGING OURSELVES WITH THE ROPE: How Capitalists Are Deceived And Manipulated By Totalitarians

2011-02-14T06:07:00.000-06:00

by Nevin Gussack

As conservatives reflect on the election results of November 2010, they need to hold their elected officials accountable in crafting a pro-American security policy which stresses, among other points, the importance of subordinating short term profits through trade to the nation’s interests.

Historically, our adversaries had utilized our weaknesses in our moral decay and hedonistic society to force a destruction of the USA. In the speech “On Free Trade,” (1848) Karl Marx detected that greed and economic determinism would lead to the ultimate breakup of nations and the implementation of socialism: “…free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade.”

Lenin and his successors in the world communist movement spoke of the need of using the capitalist nations to assist in the development of their industrial and military capacities for world conquest. Hu Jintao of the PRC CCP declared in a secret speech in 2008 that: “We will use our open policy, seize the economic crisis in the West as a historical moment, and use effective measures to turn them into Socialist China’s economic and cultural colonies. … Our colonization of these countries is the historical process of communism’s triumph over rotten capitalism. We Chinese communists must shoulder the great historical mission, and use socialism to defeat capitalism, eventually liberating the entire humanity with Communism.”

Our Islamist enemies meanwhile express the same contempt for our hedonistic weaknesses. Former Iranian Minister of Heavy Industries Behzad Nabavi commented in 1985 regarding the porous U.S. sanctions: “What embargo? Those people in the West will put their own mothers on auction for profit.” Abdul Rashid, the Taliban’s “anti-drug” enforcer detected the hedonistic decay in Western societies and asserted that “Opium is permissible because it is consumed by kafirs in the West, and not by Muslims or Afghans.” Hence, the consumerism and the moral decline of the West is a valuable tool in the hands of the enemies of freedom.

How do we stop this?

In order to starve the beast of totalitarianism, the United States needs to embark on a program to halt all trade to nations who desire our downfall. This can come through strict enforcement by an empowered FBI and CIA, liberated from the shackles of political correctness.

Secondly, our education system needs to be thoroughly re-oriented to teach patriotism. This can only come when well funded and intellectually prepared conservatives are elected en masse to school boards to champion these changes to the curriculum. Properly trained and intellectually prepared teachers and professors are necessary to implement a patriotic rejuvenation of the curriculum. Educated with the proper patriotic ideals, a new generation of businessmen and elected office holders will be able to implement policies in the nation’s interests to the detriment to the long range plans of our enemies.

Presently, our enemies are talking about their malevolent intentions towards the USA, but precious few of our business and political leaders are truly listening and making the appropriate decisions.

A Day In The Park

2011-02-13T08:39:00.000-06:00

Wilders Speech Exposes "The Elites" Islamic Police State Takeover Strategy

2011-02-08T19:15:00.000-06:00

Source: Gates of Vienna
Subtitled Video of Geert Wilders’ Speech
Below is a subtitled video of the speech given in court yesterday by Geert Wilders - on the opening day of his new trial on “hate speech” charges in Amsterdam. Many thanks to Vlaamse Leeuwin for the translation.

Note: The subtitles used in this video are not based on the same translation that we posted here, so the text is slightly different. Hat tip: Thrasymachus.

The Lights Are Going Out All Over Europe

The lights are going out all over Europe. All over the continent where our culture flourished and where man created freedom, prosperity and civilization. The foundation of the West is under attack everywhere.

All over Europe the elites are acting as the protectors of an ideology that has been bent on destroying us for fourteen centuries. An ideology that has sprung from the desert and that can produce only deserts because it does not give people freedom. The Islamic Mozart, the Islamic Gerard Reve [a Dutch author], the Islamic Bill Gates; they do not exist because without freedom there is no creativity. The ideology of Islam is especially noted for killing and oppression and can only produce societies that are backward and impoverished. Surprisingly, the elites do not want to hear any criticism of this ideology.

My trial is not an isolated incident. Only fools believe it is. All over Europe multicultural elites are waging total war against their populations. Their goal is to continue the strategy of mass immigration, which will ultimately result in an Islamic Europe — a Europe without freedom: Eurabia.

The lights are going out all over Europe. Anyone who thinks or speaks individually is at risk. Freedom-loving citizens who criticize Islam, or even merely suggest that there is a relationship between Islam and crime or honour killing, must suffer, and are threatened or criminalized. Those who speak the truth are in danger.

The lights are going out allover Europe. Everywhere the Orwellian thought police are at work, on the lookout for thought crimes everywhere, casting the populace back within the confines where it is allowed to think.

This trial is not about me. It is about something much greater. Freedom of speech is not the property of those who happen to belong to the elites of a country. It is an inalienable right, the birthright of our people. For centuries battles have been fought for it, and now it is being sacrificed to please a totalitarian ideology.

Future generations will look back at this trial and wonder who was right. Who defended freedom and who wanted to get rid of it.

The lights are going out all over Europe. Our freedom is being restricted everywhere, so I repeat what I said here last year:

It is not only the privilege, but also the duty of free people — and hence also my duty as a member of the Dutch Parliament — to speak out against any ideology that threatens freedom. Hence it is a right and a duty to speak the truth about the evil ideology that is called Islam. I hope that freedom of speech will emerge triumphant from this trial. I hope not only that I shall be acquitted, but especially that freedom of speech will continue to exist in the Netherlands and in Europe.

Today's Craftsman

2011-02-08T06:00:00.002-06:00

Seth Godin writes of - The New Craftsmanship

There's always been a bright line around the craftsperson, someone who takes real care and produces work for the ages. Everyone else might be a hack, or a factory guy or a suit or a drone, but a craftsperson was someone we could respect.

A craftsman might be a blacksmith or a carpenter, a visual artist or even a dedicated teacher. Someone to look up to.

Perhaps we're entering a new age of craftsmanship, one where we can see craft in the way a new business is devised, a sale is made or a website is coded. A craftsperson might be particularly talented and connected in the way she deals with clients, or be able to meet deadlines with alacrity.

Just because it's not in a crafts fair doesn't mean it didn't demand craft.

There is a lot of truth in Seth's writings. Through industry, I have been fortunate enough to be amazed by my fair share of craftsmen. Craftsmen, as they exist in industry, are those special people who are allowed to utilize their God-given talents. They are the "go-to guys". They are the type of people who repair pocket watches or circuit boards in their spare time. They are the "tinkerers" who exist among us. They are the people to do the job when it must be done right. They are "today's craftsman". I thank God for every one of them and I will never take any of them for granted.

SHOCKER: U.S. Army General Co-Authored Paper with Satanic Leader - Now Claims Iran is "Puppet Master"

2011-02-06T08:01:00.007-06:00

The story begins with the following article-

Chessboard: Balance of Power Changing Rapidly
Published on 02/01/11 By Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, US Army (Ret.)

QUOTE

This is not a set of events that one has the luxury of focusing upon individually. Egypt is key but not the only chess move in play. The chess board, or match, is a series of matches with many simultaneous games being played at once.
...
The moves on the chess board have global impact because of energy, global trade, and finances. If the trade routes are cut off or disturbed when oil and other goods cease flowing, the world economy (already at a precipice) could implode in hours and days with a twelve day global financial collapse scenario.
...
The dollar and global currencies, already falling in value, would plummet. The year 2011 may be, in fact, the year of the Apocalypse or at least a series of apocalyptic events that changes the United States and the world as we know it.
...
China and Russia comfortably play their pawns on the chessboard as they view the demise of the United and States and other semblances of historic Western power. I believe there is a real connection between Soros/Obama factions (the Progressive Socialists) in this global restructuring.

Speed is paramount now and political planning for 2011 and 2012 is a fool’s errand. The time is now to think outside of the daily routine. Chess Masters in Iran have played their cards well, and now it’s a domino effect. They have planned well, and useful dupes are doing their bidding. I am impressed that the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is being talked about much more in depth, but we need to show that it is orchestrated, right down to Muhammad el Baradei. This is not a set of events we have the luxury of focusing upon individually.
...
Iran’s master chess moves now force Israel to fight a multiple front war with little help expected from the west. If this cycle continues, the west may be so embroiled with internal chaos that Iran can act with relative impunity.

Paul E. Vallely is a retired US Army Major General and senior military analyst for Fox News. He served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War and retired in 1993 as Deputy Commanding General, Pacific Command. In 2004, together with retired Air Force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney, Vallely co-authored the book Endgame: The Blueprint for Victory in the War on Terror. Vallely currently serves as the Military Committee Chairman for the Center for Security Policy and has lent his support to the organization Veteran Defenders of America.

In his article, the retired US Army Major General seems to grasp the big picture - but then he goes off to blame Iran for all of the happenings in the middle east. It's difficult to fathom why a former Deputy Commanding General of the Pacific Command doesn't understand that Iran isn't sovereign. Iran is beholden to Russia and China.

For proof of this claim - simply review the links in the article: Iran and the Elephant in the Room.

At first, I pondered - is the above a propaganda piece - or does the General really believe that the leaders of Iran are the chess masters in this whole scheme?

But now, the more I think about it, the more I realize - it's not just difficult to fathom - it's nearly impossible for a man of the General's status not to understand the interactions between Iran and the SCO.

So, the question evolves - what is the purpose of the retired General's piece - what agenda is he pushing?

Well, for one thing, it's clear he is advocating and building support for U.S. action in Iran.

However, the agenda question becomes even more interesting if one recalls Paul Joseph Watson's June 2010 report - Bilderbergers Green Light Attack On Iran.

Continuing the evolution in thinking - Here we have a former Deputy Commanding General of the Pacific Command using the seemingly unrelated turmoil in Egypt to justify and promote U.S. action in Iran.

Is this the new narrative?

Keep in mind - At this point, most of us really don't understand who is behind the Egyptian uprising - nor are we sure where it is headed.

To dig deeper, I decided to look closer at the source - Paul E. Vallely.

Little did I know this path would lead into the deepest chasm of the bizarre. From this point forward, the story goes only as far as you are willing to take it.

The Wikipedia piece literally continues to show Mr. Vallely as a stand-up guy.

In 2005, Vallely founded a conservative political organization called Stand Up America US, that promotes the following issues: "First amendment rights, Second amendment rights, strong national defense and secure borders, national sovereignty, support of the armed forces, individual liberties and personal responsibility, fiscally responsible, limited government"

Who can argue with that mission statement?

From the beginning, I wanted to believe that Mr. Vallely was simply blinded by his view of the war on terror as a war between Islam and Judeo-Christianity. And this is still the case. But my instinct leads me to believe that there is more to the story.

Following this instinct, I decided to look into Paul E. Vallely's friends and connections -

Immediately, I was shocked to the core.

The simple purpose of my search was to determine the answer to the following question - What would drive a man in the know to advocate war with a country that doesn't even control itself?

At this point I am ending this piece with a question, two scriptures, a collection of documentation, and a soulful prayer.

Why did Paul E. Vallely choose to co-author the paper From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory with leading and proud satanist, Michael A. Aquino?

Michael Aquino and Lilith Sinclair, late 1970's

2 Corinthians 6:14 - Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?

Documentation of evil

Unfortunately or some, even with heaps of documentation, parts of this story will remain forever unbelievable. Let's begin with the hard facts-

Indisputable Fact 1 - The Temple of Set was established in 1975 by Lt. Colonel of the US Army Michael A. Aquino and certain members of the priesthood of the Church of Satan. More info HERE.

Indisputable Fact 2 - Major Michael A. Aquino was a PSYOP Research and Analysis Team Leader who co-authored the paper From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory with Commander Paul E. Vallely.

The paper states: "A MindWar message does not have to fit conditions of abstract credibility as do PSYOP themes; its source makes it credible".

A later introduction to the paper (added in 2003 by Aquino) further describes the true aim of MindWar -

"You seize control of all the means by which his government and populace process information to make up their minds, and you adjust it so that those minds are made up as you desire."

The Satanist leader continues to point out the obvious use of MindWar during the first Gulf War and during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He says -

"in both instances extreme PSYOP was directed both against the object of attack" and upon the "U.S. domestic public".

Fortunately, at least one right standing individual has publicly opposed the use of this tact upon the American people. Retired senior officer of U.S. Military Intelligence - W. Patrick Lang recently said the following of "Mind War" Aquino and Vallely -

I keep running into people who ought to know better but who think that this kind of thing is acceptable in a domestic US setting.

Additional Links - only admissible into your own individual court of opinion.
MESSAGE MACHINE - Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand By DAVID BARSTOW of The New York Times
Aquino, Satan and the U.S. Military
Satanic subversion of the U.S. Military by Jeffrey Steinberg
Famous Kidnapping Case Implicates Top Political Figures in Child Prostitution Network (The Johhny Gosch Case)
Hey! Leave Those Kids Alone by Charlene Fassa
The Johnny Gosch Foundation - "...to bring awareness of human trafficking and pedophilia to the world..."
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication

Lt Col Michael Aquino, the Temple of Set,organized pedo rings, mind control
War on Terror – General Paul E Vallely – Men Who Stare At Goats – Strategic Mind War

Note 1: The political action committee for leftist enigma Lyndon LaRouche published a 25 page hit piece entitled "Soldiers of Satan" which features much of this same material linked above.

Note 2: I understand that the "Additional Links" above will be made to serve opposing purposes in the future. They, including this piece, will be used either to expose the presence and the hideous effects of evil on this earth -or- they will be used to discredit those, like me, who seek to follow the holy path of Jesus Christ. I have chosen to publish links to all of the material that I could find in my short period of research so that you can be the judge for yourself - utilizing your own free soul. I personally am not afraid of the evil one - for I readily receive the commission from God as translated in James 4:7 -

Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

Heavenly father I pray for your children who are lost and blinded by the great deceiver. I pray for the leaders of our nation to repent and turn to God. I ask this in the name of your son Jesus Christ. Amen.

Last edited - 2/8/2011

Private Government Knew Egypt Crisis Was Coming - Now Executing Plan For Mubarak Replacement

2011-02-01T05:45:00.000-06:00

Globalist Stooge ElBaradei Prepares To Hijack Egyptian Revolution
by Paul Joseph Watson - Infowars.com

Zbigniew Brzezinski has called for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to step down as globalist stooge Mohammed ElBaradei prepares to act as the pied piper for a revolution that has been hijacked by the global elite.

Speaking with fellow CFR member Christiane Amanpour, Brzezinski told ABC News’ This Weekthat Mubarak must be convinced by “outside advice” that “It is in his interest as well as in Egypt’s interest that he goes and that he sets in motion a process which facilitates that.”

Although Brzezinski warned of a “global political awakening” during a CFR meeting last year that threatened to topple the existing international order, it is unsurprising that Brzezinski is calling for the ousting of Mubarak despite the fact that he has been a dutiful servant to the new world order elite.

It became known in Brzezinski’s globalist circles at least three years ago that Egypt was teetering on the edge of revolt and that another political entity would fill the inevitable vacuum of power if the elite didn’t get ahead of the game.

That’s why the American Embassy trained rebel leaders to infiltrate opposition groups from the very beginning, as the Telegraph revealed on Saturday.

The geopolitical maneuverings of the US military-industrial complex don’t take away from the fact that the revolt in Egypt is driven by genuine grievances relating to spiraling food prices, high unemployment, policy brutality and the grass-roots drive to unseat a 30 year dictatorship.

However, if they allow globalist carpetbagger Mohammed ElBaradei to seize power, demonstrators are ensuring that their actions are in vain and ultimately worthless.

Addressing protesters in Cairo yesterday, ElBaradei demanded Mubarak step down and promised “change within days”.

“You are the owners of this revolution. You are the future,” ElBaradei declared. “Our essential demand is the departure of the regime and the beginning of a new Egypt in which each Egyptian lives in virtue, freedom and dignity.”

Egyptians may be the owners of the revolution, but the owners of ElBaradei himself are busy hijacking that revolution by installing a puppet that will be just as compliant with Egypt continuing as a globalist client state as Mubarak has been for the past 30 years. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Won’t get fooled again?

ElBaradei serves on the Board of Trustees of the International Crisis Group, who on Friday issued a press release protesting the decision on behalf of Egyptian authorities to place ElBaradei under house arrest.

International Crisis Group is a shadowy NGO (non-governmental organization) that enjoys an annual budget of over $15 million and is bankrolled by the likes of Carnegie, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as George Soros’ Open Society Institute. Soros himself serves as a member of the organization’s Executive Committee.

In other words, this is a major geopolitical steering group for the global elite.

The fact that their man ElBaradei is being primed to head up the post-Mubarak government should set alarm bells ringing in the ears of every demonstrator who is protesting in the name of trying to wrestle Egypt away from the clutches of new world order control.

Indeed, even Mubarak himself is now seemingly catching on to the understanding that his usefulness to the global power elite has run its course, remarking during a national address Saturday that the protests were “part of a bigger plot to shake the stability and destroy the legitimacy” of the political system.

ElBaradei is the central figure in a long term plot to subvert and steer the outcome of a revolution that the global elite knew was coming three years ahead of time. Although his installation as puppet president may see political freedoms temporarily restored as a symbolic gesture, Egypt’s destiny will still be firmly under the control of the same parties that have pulled Mubarak’s strings for the past three decades.

Sham Afghanistan-style rigged elections will ensue where the Egyptian people are given the false decision of choosing between two globalist-controlled puppets. The international media will hail the event as a momentous occasion for democracy in the Middle East and broadcast endless images of purple fingers, but the true legacy of the revolution will be eviscerated and Egyptians will eventually realize that they were the victims of a cruel deception.

—

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.

Look Again and Think - By Oswald Chambers

2011-01-27T05:33:00.001-06:00

Do not worry about your life . . . —Matthew 6:25

A warning which needs to be repeated is that “the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches,” and the lust for other things, will choke out the life of God in us (Matthew 13:22). We are never free from the recurring waves of this invasion. If the frontline of attack is not about clothes and food, it may be about money or the lack of money; or friends or lack of friends; or the line may be drawn over difficult circumstances. It is one steady invasion, and these things will come in like a flood, unless we allow the Spirit of God to raise up the banner against it.

“I say to you, do not worry about your life . . . .” Our Lord says to be careful only about one thing-our relationship to Him. But our common sense shouts loudly and says, “That is absurd, I must consider how I am going to live, and I must consider what I am going to eat and drink.” Jesus says you must not. Beware of allowing yourself to think that He says this while not understanding your circumstances. Jesus Christ knows our circumstances better than we do, and He says we must not think about these things to the point where they become the primary concern of our life. Whenever there are competing concerns in your life, be sure you always put your relationship to God first.

“Sufficient for the day is its own trouble” (Matthew 6:34). How much trouble has begun to threaten you today? What kind of mean little demons have been looking into your life and saying, “What are your plans for next month— or next summer?” Jesus tells us not to worry about any of these things. Look again and think. Keep your mind on the “much more” of your heavenly Father (Matthew 6:30).

My Utmost For His Highest

HU'S YOUR DADDY? - MEDIA MONTAGE

2011-01-22T13:28:00.005-06:00

Sadly, it's a headline apparently gaining in popularity. UPDATE - January 23, 2011: Article excerpts added.

American Thinker cartoon
by Albin Sadar and Robert DeClaire

January 21, 2011 - The Times Of India -
Hu's your daddy? Not yet. Uncle Sam flexes aging muscle
Even as Hu was engaging Obama, one US Senator discovered (late) that most of the patriotic baubles sold in gift shops in Washington DC, including busts of US Presidents from George Washington to Barack Obama, are made in China (which wasn't exactly breaking news). "It appears that a museum owned by the people of the United States, celebrating the history of the United States, cannot find companies in this country employing American workers that are able to manufacture statues of our founding fathers, or our current president," Senator Bernie Sanders fumed in a letter to the Director of the Smithsonian Museum. "That is pretty pathetic! I was not aware that the collapse of our manufacturing base had gone that far."

January 20, 2011 - Irish Central -
Hu's your Daddy?
We owe the communist country almost 1 trillion dollars in debt. On top of that we have a huge imbalance of trade with this country due to many reasons, but chiefly because we compete on an uneven playing field and no one is doing anything about it. The communist country does not have labor laws, as we know them, convict labor and children are used to manufacture cheap products. They also, with impunity, manufacture knock offs of everything ranging from designer hand bags to Ipads, flooding the markets with cheap imitation goods. They put on line a new coal fired energy plant every week, don't dare wear a white shirt while outside in Shanghai and don't even think of sticking your toe in the Huangpu River.

January 20, 2011 - The Tycoon Report -
"Hu's" Your Daddy Now?
As the economic imbalances between the two countries have now hit dangerous levels, the United States must halt this growing divergence if they want to maintain the edge as the global superpower before it's too late... The bottom line is that the trading relationship with China is not on a level playing field. The reality is that it never really was, but the United States let it fester and ignored that this issue could someday get out of control, to the point that national economic and global security is threatened.

January 20, 2011 - Mind Numbed Robot -
Hu’s Your Daddy!
Continuing the mantra of “I never met a communist I didn’t like,” the Obama’s welcomed Chinese Dictator Hu Jintau to the White-house with open arms and a formal dinner this week while his Democrat cronies prattled on about China’s currency policies and paid token lip service the country’s human rights violations, all the while warning China that “If they don’t straighten up, we’re going to use some really tough language, Little Mister.”

January 18, 2011 - Conservatives4Congress -
Hu’s Your Daddy
President Obama, Hu’s your daddy. Note the lack of a question mark. We’re up to our eyeballs in debt to China thanks in no small part to this administration’s irresponsibility, and on the eve of his visit to the US, Chinese premiere Hu Jintao has been busy dissing America while shunning human rights groups, and with the Obama administration’s complicity. Now, we’re throwing a lavish state dinner for Hu, the first for a Chinese leader in 13 years. That “dangerous separatist” the Dalai Lama can’t go home, Tibet is not free, Taiwan is still under threat and dissidents remain in prison across China while people of faith face daily oppression, while China backs the dangerous North Korean regime. But we’re throwing Hu a big party. So — Hu’s your daddy.

January 17, 2011 - Kish Collections -
Hu's Your Daddy?
Is America really going to allow Hu Jintao (and those like him) to run the world? Every day, it seems, China (and communist / fascist dictatorships in general) grows wealthier while America grows weaker.

With respect to America's foreign policy, it's hard to understand why so many people seem to lose sight of one simple fact -- Real wealth is based on real assets. Real wealth is not based on the quantity of "official paper" amassed. Real assets equal land, natural resources, industrial resources, distribution chain, technology resources, capable human resources, intelligence, available market and market control.

Similarly, there is a second key fact of which many people seem blind -- Military might is a byproduct of real assets.

June 21, 2010 - Investment News -
Hu's your daddy: China's leader turns tables on debt-laden nations

Photo Credit: SERR8D'S CUTTING EDGE

Chess games are won by those who can think and plan the farthest ahead. China, at least at the moment, appears to have a better sense of how the board is laid out.

November 19, 2009 - Urbanatomy Media -
Hu's your daddy?
Most Western pundits agreed that Obama's visit to China which wrapped up yesterday was both a PR and political success for the hosts... the trip was billed as “Obama goes to meet America’s bankers,”...

April 27, 2006 - American Chronicle -
Hu’s Your Daddy
They are beyond pro-choice in China, oh yes, indeed, because one child too many is an abortion, in the first trimester or any later portion, as per the government creed.

Christians are killed, tortured or languishing in jail, but please, don’t bother to tell Yale. That once Christian leaning institution now has a secular intuition and to hell with God, country and all that patriotic and religious rot. It’s hard-core left, and morally bereft, and more interested with making a buck in Chinese stock.

Why not? Yale, Bill Gates and Boeing all say, it’s all “free trade” where laborers earn pennies a day. In China, the workers can’t be fickle, life’s only worth a plug nickel, and the government has the final say. As for China’s now corporate American friends, who only think the bottom line is where it ends, they are proud and happy to have made a good deal. How naïve they are, for not remembering too far, that what China does not buy, it will simply steal.

The Five Best Arguments Against Sharia in the United States

2011-01-21T05:05:00.002-06:00

Zomblog article excerpt- I shouldn’t have to write this essay. But a judge in Oklahoma forced me into it.

Last month, 70% of the voters in Oklahoma approved State Question 755, which bans Sharia law (and international law) from being used in the state’s legal system. Almost immediately afterward, CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) sued to have the vote overturned, based on the bizarre claim that the measure is “unconstitutional.” U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange then sided with CAIR and issued an injunction preventing the measure from taking effect until all lawsuits against it are resolved. Since the suits will likely take years to play out, the new measure (and the will of the voters) will be stymied for the foreseeable future.

Those who oppose Sharia in the United States often argue their point by highlighting how misogynistic, backward, cruel and discriminatory Islamic law can be under most interpretations. And while all that may be true, it is the wrong argument to make. I get so frustrated watching pundits, politicians and bloggers making the weakest argument in what should be a slam-dunk debate that I’ve decided to write this brief outline of what I think should be the prioritized hierarchy of arguments against the use of Sharia in the United States.

In order, these are the arguments that Sharia’s opponents should be using, not just in Oklahoma but anywhere else in the country where the same issue crops up:

1. U.S. law is the “supreme law of the land,” no exceptions.

2. Sharia, as “divine revelation,” is inherently undemocratic.

3. Many aspects of Sharia are flagrantly unconstitutional.

4. Sharia is fundamentally religious law, and should be inapplicable to U.S. criminal or civil law.

5. Subjectively, Sharia is a discriminatory and cruel legal system.

The entire article is available at Zomblog.

In addition, most of what needs to be understood today in regards to Islamic extremism is linked in the following two Kish Collections articles (includes links to key video)-

U.S. Media Sleeps While Historic Trial Unfolds

Necessary definitions for Christian understanding of Islamic extremism

China Plants Flag on Constitution Avenue

2011-01-20T18:02:00.004-06:00

(KurtNimmo) – On Tuesday night, Obama followed the script closely. He sat down to what the corporate media describes as “an unusual and intimate dinner” with Hu Jintao, the CEO of the sprawling slave labor gulag and globalist dream come true in China.




Symbolism? The red flag on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C.

After dinner, Hu Jinato and Obama attended a “pomp-filled gala” designed to celebrate with sickening pageantry what is in essence a planting of the Chinese flag on American soil.

The Associated Press admits the lavish affair with its over-the-top entreaties is designed to “soften the American public’s suspicions about China,” a nation that detains and tortures individuals for exercising their rights to freedom of association, freedom of religion and freedom of expression.

According to the corporate media, Obama will lecture China on the persecution of Tibetans, Uhgurs, Falun Gong, environmental degradation, currency manipulation, theft of intellectual property, imbalance of and unfair trade practices, human rights violations and the release of Liu Xiaobo, the Nobel Prize winner imprisoned by China’s authoritarian leadership.

China will in turn take the U.S. to task for supposedly initiating a global depression that will undoubtedly dwarf the Great Depression of the 1930s, accumulating a staggering debt, and interfering in its internal affairs.

Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, economic depressions have become scientifically engineered affairs, asCongressman Lindberg said in the Congressional Record on December 22, 1913, after the Federal Reserve Act was passed in the dead of the night.

We are told the Chinese are mighty sore about their undervalued Treasury stake, but this is a cover too. QE2 and the printing of funny money out of thin air by the Federal Reserve is a shrewd if cynical device engineered to take down the once Great United States.

China owns us. There will be blood – but not before Obama, Biden, Clinton, and the political class grovel and kiss the ring and this act is covered up by a complaisant corporate media.

Debt, trade, discussion, pomp and circumstance – all of this is little more than cover. Hu Jintao and his minions have arrived in the district of criminals for one reason and one reason only – to plant a red flag of corporatism – that is, fascism – on Constitution Avenue.

According to the globalists, China is the next evolutionary step in human history. Our future is a high-tech prison planet, electronic panopticon, and eventually a killing field unless we do something about it – and soon.

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history,” David Rockefeller told the New York Times.

Mao’s “social experiment” has come to America. The holy writ of Maoism was forged out of Marxism, the latter a contrivance of Wall Street and the banksters.

Cartel capitalism has enjoyed a long standing love affair with communism, as the late Gary Allen so eloquently pointed out.

“If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of superrich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all,” Allen wrote. “Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite.”

Power-seeking megalomaniacs built the China Miracle from the ground up over the last few decades and now it has come to claim a stake in America.

Hu Jintao did not arrive here to eat dinner in the the Old Family Dining Room at the White House and talk shop with Obama the teleprompter reader and his Goldman Sachs, CFR, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg advisors.

Hu Jintao arrived to plant the flag and initiate the next phase in a globalist effort to turn the planet into a slave gulag and ultimately a well-oiled killing machine meticulously designed by an inbred gaggle of eugenicist psychopaths.

Source: Infowars

Related Post: Hu's Your Daddy?
Is America really going to allow Hu Jintao (and those like him) to run the world?

Can I Trust Scientists, Researchers, or Scientific Publications - Never Again

2011-01-19T03:55:00.000-06:00

by Lance Winslow

As we grow up we are trained to submit to authority, and believe what we are told. Unfortunately we are fed a bunch of lies from the time we are children. In many Christian families the parents tell the kids that Santa Claus will bring them toys if they are good, we know that is poppycock. When we go to school our teacher explains history, and we memorize all the dates and events. When we grow up we realize that much of what we were taught is utter hokum.

As we grow to be adults we trust our leaders such as our president, the U.S. Congress, our judges, the presidents of corporations, and the clergy of the Church. Unfortunately, we quickly learned that much of what comes out of these folks' mouths is just more manipulation, yet they have the nerve to call it leadership. For those of us that go to a university to get a degree we trust our professors, we trust academia, we trust our researchers and scientists. In fact we trust them more than our grade school teachers, the leadership of our church, and our politicians combined. Many students in college trust them more than their own parents even.

Unfortunately, now we see that the scientists, researchers and most of the summaries concerning these folks' research is not entirely correct. Yes, I guess "Global Warming" is perhaps the most recent example, and biggest proof of what I'm saying in the present period. Personally, I will never trust these folks again in my life - scientists, researchers or Scientific Publications because I realize they are no better than other human beings and they are more interested in their careers and collecting research money than giving us the straight goods.

And I'm not just talking about the global warming sham, I'm also talking about the research put forth by Big Pharma, or the political research put out by so-called NGOs which claimed to be nonpolitical. There is nothing nonpolitical about any university which gets government funding, corporate funding, or money from nonprofit groups which are all political by nature.

Please understand that my commentary here today is not one of bitterness, or anger, I am merely putting words onto paper from my personal observations, experiences, and firsthand knowledge of events over the last 35 years. If for some reason you still trust the system, there is a book that I would like you to read;

"The Craft of Political Research" (Sixth Edition) by W Phillips Shively, Prentice-Hall publishers, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2005, 176 pages, ISBN: 0-13-117440-1.

Indeed, I hate to break it to you but in this lifetime the best policy is to trust no one. Please consider all this and think on it. If you are a scientist, researcher, or a member of academia and you'd like to defend yourself from the comments herein you may e-mail me with your questions, concerns, or further points of contention, but make sure you are prepared - I am!

Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers, experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds. Lance Winslow hopes you've enjoyed today's discussion and topic. WorldThinkTank.net - Have an important subject to discuss, contact Lance Winslow.

Article Source: EzineArticles.com expert - Lance_Winslow

J.N. Kish - In addition, see the following material in regards to global warming. Remember - there was a time, not too long ago, that a large majority of people believed the global warming hoax was based on solid science. I agree with Mr. Winslow and would add that clear thinking individuals would be fools not to question the "research" put forth by Big Pharma. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

Physics Professor Resigns: Claims Global Warming is Pseudoscientific Fraud

Global Warming Religion Violates Separation of Church and State

EPA Cover-Up

The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics

Cap-and-Trade, State-by-State

Global Warming is a Hoax - Get the Facts Here

What could Michael Crichton, Rush Limbaugh, Charlton Heston and Religion possibly have to do with Global Warming?

MUST LISTEN: Audio Clip - Charlton Heston reads Jurassic Park

Hu's Your Daddy?

2011-01-17T10:00:00.004-06:00

The Wall Street Journal - Hu Highlights Need for U.S.-China Cooperation, Questions Dollar
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405...DNewsCollection

QUOTE

Chinese President Hu Jintao... called the present U.S. dollar-dominated currency system a "product of the past" and highlighted moves to turn the yuan into a global currency.

Hu, who also heads China's ruling Communist Party, rarely interacts with the international media. The Wall Street Journal submitted a series of questions to China's Foreign Ministry for Mr. Hu to answer. The Washington Post also submitted questions. The Foreign Ministry supplied Mr. Hu's responses to seven questions—but did not address questions about imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo, China's growing naval power and complaints about alleged Chinese cyberattacks, among others.

"All foreign companies registered in China are Chinese enterprises," Mr. Hu said

Is America really going to allow Hu Jintao (and those like him) to run the world?

Every day, it seems, China (and communist / fascist dictatorships in general) grows wealthier while America grows weaker.

With respect to America's foreign policy, it's hard to understand why so many people seem to lose sight of one simple fact -- Real wealth is based on real assets. Real wealth is not based on the quantity of "official paper" amassed. Real assets equal land, natural resources, industrial resources, distribution chain, technology resources, capable human resources, intelligence, available market and market control.

Similarly, there is a second key fact of which many people seem blind -- Military might is a byproduct of real assets.

Historical example -- The American Civil War

Question - Why did the North win the Civil War? ... Answer -

QUOTE

Cannoneers by Rennett Stowe
A combination of a greater population to draw manpower from, combined with more industrial capacity to produce war materials, and the ability to blockade the Southern ports to reduce imports of all kinds. The Southern forces were never able to overcome their lack of supplies and materials, such as cannon and gunpowder. Bravery alone cannot carry the day.
...
The south never lost a battle because of lack of supplies. They used the surrounding land and farms for resources. (James Mckie 8th Grade Georgia History Student,  Fitzgerald, Georgia - Where the North and South met arm in arm.) But lead, gunpowder, rifles, and cannon don't grow on farms.
...
The South attacked at Gettysburg in an attempt to capture a SHOE factory.  The Fallacy of the Shoe Factory - There never was a shoe factory in Gettysburg. Or even in the area. There were no more shoes in Gettysburg than any other town in Pennsylvania. However, Confederate general Robert E. Lee badly needed shoes for his soldiers, and he went to Gettysburg because he had heard there was a supply of shoes there. They had a skirmish with Union troops which it escalated into the Battle of Gettysburg as forces from both sides joined the fight.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_did_the_Nort...r#ixzz1BIbEbtWG

Ten Recent Headlines

Communist China stakes claim to S. Texas oil and gas
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/10/communi...to-s-texas.html

Hu adopts quasi-Maoist tactics
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/10/hu-adop...st-tactics.html

SHOCKING - American Weapons for China - President Obama Pushes for Sale of C-130s to China
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/10/shockin...-for-china.html

Forbes Places Communist Leader On Top
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/11/forbes-...nist-china.html

China Purchases U.S. Based General Motors Factory
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/11/china-p...ral-motors.html

Quantitative Easing and World War
Why the U.S. has Launched a New Financial World War -- And How the the Rest of the World Will Fight Back - By MICHAEL HUDSON
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/11/quantit...-world-war.html

The Chinese Military Buildup and The Art of War
UK Telegraph - China preparing for armed conflict 'in every direction'
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/12/chinese...art-of-war.html

Chinese Counterfeit Parts in the DOD Supply Chain
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/11/chinese...dod-supply.html

China Confirms Construction of Aircraft Carrier Warship - Fleet Expected By 2020
China reveals aircraft carrier plans - FT.com
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/12/china-c...f-aircraft.html

NY's Empire State Building lit up red in honor of Communist China's 60th anniversary
NY's Empire State Building chided for honoring China
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5906AK20091001

Chinese History - Mao's Evil Legacy

Reminder - Communist China was founded by Mao Zedong. Mao's policies and political purges from 1949 to 1976 are widely believed to have caused the deaths of between 40 to 70 million people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_zedong
http://www.carpenoctem.tv/military/mao.html

QUOTE

Mao is Watching, Beijing
by Francisco Diez
Mao formed the Red Army, and his followers elected him chairman of the Chinese Soviet Republic, formed in 1931. Based on his study of great conquerors of earlier ages - with Sun Tzu as his primary model - Mao set as his first priority maintaining an army in the field. He saw revolutionary warfare against the stronger, established state as a protracted conflict with would take years to win. His Red Army would have to gain political support from the peasants and militarily control the countryside before approaching the population centers. Following the axioms of Sun Tzu, the Red Army attacked when strong and retreated when weak.

Mao implemented his strategy when Chiang moved his stronger army against the Red Army in four separate offensives. Each time, Mao retreated rather than become decisively engaged. Then, in 1934, Mao was surrounded by Chiang's forces, and only a bold breakout prevented the destruction of his army. For a year, the Red Army fought and retreated westward to Siikiang Province and then north to the Communist stronghold in remote Shensi. By the end of the six thousand-mile march, the co-called Long March, only twenty thousand of Mao's original one hundred thousand followers remained. The survivors, though, were experienced, hardened, and dedicated to Mao and the CCP. Moreover, along the march's route, Mao had left behind small "cells," or groups, of loyal comrades with whom he would later build political and military support.

Where do we go from here?

The writing is on the wall -- But what will it take to wake America to the growing threat?

America must reverse the policies that have allowed, enabled, and encouraged China to amass real assets which WILL LEAD America into real war.

It is my belief that Americans (us free individuals) must build a popular media-driven resistance to this advancing threat -- before it is too late. So please, while we still have the free internet as our tool -- do your part. Spread the word. Build support -- not against the Chinese people -- but support against the communist / fascist dictatorships that brutally rule over the Chinese people and clearly now threaten to rule over us.

I don't know about you, but - I have a daddy - and his name is not Hu.

Oswald Chambers - A Relatively Unknown Great

2011-01-15T06:49:00.001-06:00

For the past few weeks, I have been reading daily devotionals by Oswald Chambers. They are available for free at MY UTMOST FOR HIS HIGHEST. I highly recommend these devotionals - they cut to the core of Christianity.

According to the biography posted at utmost.org-

Oswald Chambers was not famous during his lifetime. At the time of his death in 1917 at the age of forty-three, only three books bearing his name had been published. Among a relatively small circle of Christians in Britain and the U.S., Chambers was much appreciated as a teacher of rare insight and expression, but he was not widely known.

It is said - behind every great man there's a great woman. According to Oswald's page on Wikipedia-

While there are more than 30 books that bear his name, he only penned one book, Baffled to Fight Better. His wife, Biddy, was a stenographer and could take dictation at a rate of 250 words per minute. During his time teaching at the Bible College and at various sites in Egypt, Biddy kept verbatim records of his lessons. She spent the remaining 30 years of her life compiling her records into the bulk of his published works.

Oswald's words are a timeless gift from God.

Additional links -
The Quotable Oswald Chambers with My Utmost – The Oswald Chambers Story DVD
Oswald Chambers—Abandoned to God (Paperback) by David McCasland

Diagnosis - Mercury Poisoning - For Former KGB Exposing Russian Military Mafia System Of Ruling Elite

2011-01-08T08:08:00.004-06:00

According to author JR Nyquist - "Victor Kalashnikov is a former KGB Lt. Colonel who worked for Soviet intelligence. After leaving the KGB in 1992 he worked for the presidential administration of Boris Yeltsin. He also served as a Russian representative for a German oil company and began a career in journalism which brought him into conflict with the Kremlin."

Last week, the Sydney Morning Herald reported that Viktor and his wife Marina may have been poisoned. "German prosecutors have launched a criminal investigation into whether two Russian dissidents in Berlin were poisoned by agents of the Kremlin." For more, see the article - Former spy in poison scare by Nick Allen.

Last week and again this week, JR Nyquist has published excerpts of recent conversations with Kalashnikov in two must read articles - WILL RUSSIA KEEP THE TREATY? and ORIGINS OF A KILLER STATE.

One message board member said of the second article - "This is a real gem, don't just read it, study it!" It is my opinion that this sentiment may be applied to both articles as a whole.

WILL RUSSIA KEEP THE TREATY? key excerpts -

In the Soviet Union," Kalashnikov explained, "there was strict discipline in the nomenklatura [ruling elite], keeping it effective in its own way. In Russia today there is something different at work. We call it 'solidarity within a criminal organization.' To join the ruling elite means to become part of criminal businesses. This kind of relationship is stronger, and the discipline more severe, than during Soviet times... That is the tragedy of Russia today, that it is run by real gangsters, becoming another sort of threat for the rest of the world. It is not corruption, but a criminal organization that has taken a huge country with all of its weapons. Now the question may arise, how did it happen?
...
If Communism was a system that deprived ordinary people of opportunity and freedom, the new system does the same thing through a more efficient mechanism.
...
According to Kalashnikov, talk about various bodies in Russia doing this or that is nonsense. It is all a deception. There is one class, working as one vast criminal enterprise, holding down the entire society. "And being so rich," added Kalashnikov, "and having no serious challenges within the country, they are still well aware that the only way to place the stolen wealth properly would be to deposit this wealth in Western banks, in Europe, in Cyprus, in Switzerland, and elsewhere; because they know the source of this wealth is questionable. They understand that this money could be taken away from them at any time. So they are eager to launder this money in the West. For this purpose, they need close cooperation with Western banks and institutions to legalize their money. That's what they need, therefore, they naturally cultivate closer links with Western governments and businesses.
...
There is another side of this blackmail which Kalashnikov didn't mention. When Western politicians and businessmen get tangled up with Russia's mafia elite, they enter into a partnership from which they cannot easily extricate themselves. Western bankers who have laundered Russian money are now part of the Russian mafia's scheme. They have purchased the infamous one-way ticket.

ORIGINS OF A KILLER STATE key excerpts -

...Kalashnikov's interest in history led him to uncover the Soviet Union's initial phase of development during the Russian Civil War. This initial phase helps us to understand the later path of Soviet development, and the current Russian obsession with war preparations. Here we find the idea that a thing may be better known by exploring its early development, as in the psychological theories of Sigmund Freud. One might say that Kalashnikov has insights into the early childhood of the Soviet regime.
...
Russia is, in fact, a layer cake where each layer is sugared with fraud. Why had this system made Khordorkovsky into an "oligarch." Why was that same system destroying him? It is for the same reason that, under Lenin and Stalin, the Soviet state created the entrepreneurs of the New Economic Policy (NEP men) in the 1920s, and subsequently destroyed them. It goes to the nature of the regime. But where was this nature acquired? How did it come about? What is it, exactly, and how may we know it? Part of the answer lies in the desire to win over the West, or the Western media. "When I joined the analytical department in January 85, the standard analytical memo to the Politburo was not to exceed two pages in print. Then, with Gorbachev in power, that was downsized to one and a half, then to one page. Then, starting around 1990, when the crisis was already in sight, there was an instruction from the KGB chief in Moscow, that any such memo would attach a sheet of paper in which I would explain in ten lines the heart of the issue, the most important substance of the analysis. Along that way, from two pages to ten lines, a lot of things had been washed out. All the "isms" were washed out -- like communism, proletarianism, etc. All necessary things for key decision makers excluded such terms. What remained in the end? I can summarize it in two critical things, based on 1990 guidelines: (1) What shall we do to stay somewhat longer in power, physically? (2) What do they in Washington, Vienna, London, etc. write about us? What do they think of Gorbachev, etc.?"

Thus, explained Kalashnikov, the regime was interested in the timing of its own demise, and in the way its leading figures were seen in the West. This was the all-important component. And for the individual political actor: "What do they think of me?" The regime's script (as it were), and the political actor's reception upon the stage, depended upon the Western audience. Were they buying the act? Were they applauding, or ready to throw fruit at those occupying the stage?

JN Kish Note: Today's American political figures seem to be operating in a similar fashion. Some believe that America's current path toward demise is also being orchestrated - like the planned "demise" of the Soviet Union. As goes the Hegelian dialectic - Thesis (Create the Crisis) then Anti-thesis (Offer the Solution). According to Jonathan Sellers - "This is the basis of globalist elite manipulation paradigms. The synthesis achieved becomes a symptomatic reponse instead of addressing the real cause (Gov't). The World Order organizes and finances Jewish groups, anti-Jewish groups, Communist groups, anti-Communist groups, and other "opposing" social forces to create predetermined outcomes ensuring power maintenance."

ORIGINS OF A KILLER STATE key excerpts continued-

Listen, Jeff, they were the exact two sets of questions: (1) What does the West think about the stability of our own position in the Kremlin? (2) What do they think in Washington, Vienna, London, etc., about me. So the key priorities of the key decision-makers were, excepting the English speakers, the same as before. This seems to be a basic law of power in Russia. So Occam's razor brings us to our discussion of communism. It was a cover for a certain power strategy, and that is final.
...
It is important to distinguish between ideology and what really happens in the world. When our heads are stuffed with ideology, our expectations are those of a fool. When we look at reality without ideology, we see something that is generally outside our expectations. Ideology and reality belong to different realms. Ideology belongs to the childish side of the imagination, while reality is the realm of the wise. The two things, ideology and reality, never coincide, ever.
...
Kalashnikov described that point where the socialist ideal of happiness first encountered reality, and came undone like a cheap sweater. "Probably you've heard something of the Tambov uprising," he said. "The Tambov area was a huge part of central Russia. It was three times larger in older times. It was a normal rural area, fairly stable, inhabited by farmers, along with handicrafts, and very religious, decent people. Now, the Bolsheviks came and imposed a lot of duties on them. So they revolted. The result in 1919 was not just an uprising but the formation of a republic with its own armies and police. So this huge armed conflict started. Lenin correctly identified the Tambov uprising as the most dangerous one to his regime. This is why the Bolsheviks stopped pushing against Europe and turned East. Their best generals and armies were thrown against the Tambov area. The official reason was to occupy Tambov. During that war, the key episode of the Russian Civil War, was the elimination of large segments of the male population in this particular area. In 1991 the regional KGB department was alarmed. For some reason, the opening of records in Novosibirsk, shed some light on what happened in Tambov. One third of the population was killed. The Bolsheviks were experimenting on people with torture and extermination techniques. When I started to explain to the Germans what happened in Tambov, they were shocked. Those who you would expect to be best prepared for such revelations, researchers into the Holocaust, were surprised at the sophisticated methods of hostage taking (to reveal hidden fighters), and the manner of executions used by the Bolsheviks. A lot of this history is simply incredible. The Bolsheviks introduced a system of concentration camps for men, women, elderly people and children, with various types of terror and indoctrination. That's what they called an occupation. But the most important thing, what emerged from the ruins of the Tambov Republic, was a permanent system of police control. From time to time they practiced, yet again, hostage taking, indoctrination, Komsomol [youth wing of the Communist Party], and now, the next stage: - they distributed this occupational regime to the rest of the country; so that socialism emerged not from Marx and Engels, but from the practice of occupying Tambov. That was the real socialism Stalin accomplished and accommodated. That system was ideal for preparing Russia for the next stage in revolutionary war. If you read Red Army papers from the late 1920s and 30s, you will find a lot of stuff regarding the kind of regime they would establish in the liberated areas of Europe."

According to Kalashnikov, in the period immediately following the Russian Civil War, Soviet military theorists saw Poland as their main enemy. It was assumed that Moscow would attack Poland and carry out Sovietization. A new regime would be established. Kalashnikov said: "The summary is as follows: We 'liberate' a given area to the West, then we bring in 5,000 political commissars, so that in two or three weeks they will establish the basis for a Soviet system." The measures proposed in Red Army plans were derived from the experience of setting up the Tambov occupation regime. The generals and police officials of the Soviet Union gradually improved their methods. Subduing an area became a science. The overall idea was simple, according to Kalashnikov: "We kill all our enemies." In the 1920s the Soviet strategists were naming certain villages in Poland or Belarus. "The Army commanders were planning to establish a Soviet regime [in Poland]. At the top of everything," said Kalashnikov, "was bringing in and putting up a powerful communist party. Of course, we will find some local activists, and together with them we will establish revolutionary committees. But local resources are not sufficient in this regard. So we need commissars and experts to supplement them, along with the Red Army. I must underline this part of the military strategy so you will see that the Bolshevik regime was not just a product of ideology, but a military way of thinking. What do we do with an area taken by the military machine? Sovietization was a military strategy, on which ideological cover was given by communism."

And so, the Soviet Union was a gigantic military formation. It is not about economics, or consumerism, or building socialism. It is about taking and occupying territory. In today's Russia, says Kalashnikov, "the military represents a force, a complex, which was behind bringing Putin and his clique to power because they needed somebody to take political responsibility for the huge bloodshed in the Caucasus. Now we have what we have. Now everybody is talking about Putin, his mistresses, his wrongdoings. Forget it. The Russian military is the key player. It is their doing. They elaborate and carry out the main Russian foreign policy, which is a military policy, worldwide. To bring it to the core of the issue, Russian foreign and military policy should be regarded as a military strategy of the Russian armed forces. Starting with 1917 we see how ideology served as a cover; but in reality it is a military policy which has fascist characteristics. Putin's billionaire friends do not fit into the Marxist idea. Russia is supposedly a democracy, but no Western international rules are relevant for us, so Khordorkovsky is our internal affair."

What people say, what they think, is different than what they really are. It is even possible that they keep this truth from themselves. Conquest is the obsession of the Russian political culture. Lenin has been described as a "militaristic politician." Here is the true character of Russia's political tendency laid bare. "An important point," added Kalashnikov: "We should not forget that in terms of Soviet military strategy, the full country was regarded as a sort of rear area for international global expansion... And another idea: that a totalitarian regime is best suited for a certain kind of war, involving the mobilization of all resources."

So the Soviet system, and today's Russian system, is built for total mobilization.

Toward the end of my conversation with Kalashnikov I asked his opinion of China's role in relation to Russia's military focus. "There is joint planning against America," he admitted. "Ultimately, they are sort of a military-political combination. Yes, it is like a bloc, but not like NATO. Russia's arsenal is a joint nuclear umbrella [for China and other states]. Again, as long as other observers get down to the practical issues of military strategy we get closer to the core of the matter. The distribution of military power is the key. Look at this and you will get an idea of who your friends are, and who are your enemies. That is my basic understanding of the issue."

Let us pray for the total healing of the Kalashnikov's and for our humanity's escape from the grip of evil.

Related - VIDEO - 2009 JR Nyquist interview with Victor and Marina Kalashnikov

Eyewitness Lawyer Closes Case On Underwear Bombing

2011-01-05T19:25:00.006-06:00

Christmas Day One Year Later-The Underwear Bomber-Case Closed
by Kurt Haskell from Thailand

I've been attempting to write this article for the last 36 hours but the internet has been out at our hotel...............

It has been one year since the Underwear Bomber incident that changed my life. I'm not going to rehash the entire story of my account, as that is available here in my past postings on this blog. I just have a few things to say that I've been thinking about as I hike through the jungles of Thailand.

On January 28, 2010 I first posted that the Sharp Dressed Man was a U.S. Government Agent.

http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-about-flight-253-has-been.html

I am now nearly 100% certain that I am correct.

Three days after I wrote the above blog post, I wrote the following post, which discusses what I considered to be the most important remaining questions regarding flight 253.

http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/remaining-questions-from-flight-253-and.html

The third question that I asked, "Was the bomb intended to explode?", to me, is the entire key to the story. I believe it has been answered.

On January 31, 2010 I never would have dreamt of a scenario in which the U.S. Government would ADMIT that it was handing out fake bombs to terrorists, but that has now happened on two occasions that I'm aware of in 2010:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=11684350

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/27/mohamed-osman-mohamud-portland-car-bomb_n_788695.html

Also, if you take a look at this interview with the college kid that sat next to Umar (I refuse to call him a terrorist as he is a mere patsy), you can see that the U.S. Government seized all of his clothes:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123821351

The above three articles when taken together definitively solve the entire underwear bomber episode. The first two represent the modus operandi of the FBI/CIA, which is, if nobody get hurt, fake bombs are o.k. I will discuss that aspect in a minute. When you look deeply at the third article you have to ask the question, why were all of his clothes seized? The bombing substance, allegedly PETN was all over the airplane cabin near Umar's seat. It is not like there was a lack of material to be tested. The truth is that the government seized it all so that nobody could test the real chemical composition to determine that the bomb was indeed a dud. If I would have known that I would be writing this article one year ago, I would have picked up some of the substance as I walked within inches of it.

If you accept that the Underwear Bomber had an intentionally defective bomb /fake bomb, then you need not answer any of the other questions that I posed on January 31, 2010. The answers are either unnecessay or have only one possible explanation.

Before I get into that discussion, let me state that even if you accept that the bomb was fake, it does not mean that the plot didn't have victims. The last 10 minutes on flight 253 were the most terrifying moments of my life. For months I did not sleep, and my doctor diagnosed me with post traumatic stress disorder. It is also likely that without the fast acting efforts of a flight attendant equipped with a fire extinguisher, our plane would have blown up from the fire that resulted from the fake bomb.

Back to why the fake bomb is so important to this story...........

Since it can be almost certainly accepted that the FBI/CIA planted Umar with a fake bomb, we must ask a few more questions. Who was the Sharp Dressed Man? The answer is now certain that it was a U.S. Government agent sent to ensure that Umar boarded the plane. Obviously, the entire fraudulent plot fails if Umar fails to board the plane. Who was the Man in Orange? The answer is not really important anymore. It is likely that he supplied Umar with the dud bomb at Schipol Airport and was taken into custody after the bomb residue was found in his carry on bag. The scenario that he lugged it in his undies from Yemen is simply not plausible. One also has to wonder why the U.S. Government changed its story so many times in relation to this guy. Obviously, he is also a U.S. Government agent. Now we must dig a little deeper and ask how did someone get enough of Umar's trust to set up the plot and give him a fake bomb. One would have to have a deep involvement in a "terrorist group" in Yemen in order to do so. One person likely wouldn't be able to accomplish winning his trust. Two or three would also be unlikely. We must accept that the U.S. Government has planted numerous "Al Qaeda" plants, perhaps even entire terrorist cells, in order to win the trust of someone like Umar. When we accept this fact, one must ask if, without such a large encouraging environment, Umar would have been a "fake terrorist" at all. It has been reported that Umar is not very intelligent. I don't doubt that at all. Is it reasonable to believe that he could have set up this plot, created a bomb (I sure don't know how to) and attacked an airline without the help of the U.S. Government? No it is not. Without the U.S. Government, Umarwould remain an unknown Nigerian.

If we accept what I have stated so far, we must dig a little deeper. The U.S. Government has now been shown to be staging "terrorist" plots with individuals who likely would be unknown without its help. We now must go a little further and question whether there have been any legitimate terrorist attacks ever. I am not well informed enough to answer that question, but in pondering that question you must consider, as uncomfortable as it may be, that the U.S. Government also staged the attacks on September 11, 2001. I will not discuss that further in this post other than to say that the only difference between the attacks on September 11, 2001 and flight 253 is a fast acting flight attendant equipped with a fire extinguisher. Without that flight attendant, flight 253 burns to the ground due to a "deranged terrorist from Nigeria."

Next, I would like to address why the U.S. Government would continue to stage such plots. There may be numerous answers to this question. The answer regarding flight 253, was that the Patriot Act needed to be renewed and body scanners needed to be placed in the airports. What a perfect way to bring body scanners to the airports: stage a fake terrorist bombing when the bomb is in the bomber's clothes. You see, if the plot was merely to catch Umar in the act, then he could have been arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit murder, which could have resulted in a life sentence. There was no need to allow Umar to light the fake bomb on the plane, unless a propaganda campaign was being staged. Not surprisingly, Umar lit the bomb in full view of everyone and not in the bathroom where it would have fizzled, as duds do, and not caused any kind of stir. Allowing Umar to light the dud bomb on the plane served the ultimate plot of the U.S. Government, which was to renew the Patriot Act and get body scanners in the airports. It is too obvious. Why the U.S. Government is attempting to raid the treasury of funds and take away our Constitutional rights is unclear. There are many possibilities and I will not discuss them here. What can't be argued is that the U.S. Government is in fact engaging in such a propaganda campaign. I suspect in 2011 we will see more fake terrorist attacks targeted to take away specific rights of U.S. citizens. Fake plots that come to mind are: bombings of malls, trains, boats, universities and sporting events (Likely by U.S. citizens this time). Of course, each plot will be followed by a security solution that will involve the loss of rights and drain the treasuryfurther. Stay tuned.

It is unfortunate that the USA has become what it has, which is the true global terrorist. This is no longer your grandmother's red, white and blue U.S.A. My support for my government due to this incident has become nil. When I tried to help in the investigation, the government lied. It put out false propaganda stating: "We've seen nothing in 200 hours of video", "No man in orange", "No sharp dressed man" and even stooped so low as to have another passenger call me to try and tell me I didn't see what I did. Unbelievable. Further, I watched as pictures of Umar's underwear and passport were shown on t.v. I have figured out that with the U.S. Government, what's up is down and what's down is up. The release of those photos told me that they were fake. Meanwhile, the Schiphol Airport video that would reveal the truth remains hidden. Call me what you will, but my beliefs are entirely justified.

What also is entirely disturbing to me, is that the media does not do any investigative journalism. My claims have not been followed up on. I have discoverd that the media is nothing but a mouthpiece for the U.S Government. I saw a "documentary" put out by the BBC that showed Umar walking through security and showing his passport. Come on. When it is said that a picture speaks a thousand words it certainly does. That reinforcement made many more people believe in the official story.

Lastly, I must comment on the recent conspiracy charges that have been brought against Umar:

http://detnews.com/article/20101217/METRO/12170394/Suspected-%E2%80%98underwear-bomber%E2%80%99-arraigned-on-terror-conspiracy-charges

I have to ask why these charges have been brought so late in the game. To me the answer is clear. Only when negotiations on a plea deal broke down were these charges brought. Why? They are being used as a hammer to force a plea deal. The U.S. Government DOES NOT WANT to go to trial with Umar (who now knows that he was duped), representing himself. I blogged previously on why I thought that this scenario would be one of the greatest events in the history of the U.S. More importantly, the new charge is one of conspiracy. A conspiracy requires an agreement between at least two individuals. It is obvious that the failure to bring this charge until one year later shows that the U.S. Government did not want to admit that a conspiracy occurred. The indictment reads that Umar conspired with "persons known and unknown". We have to ask that if conspirators are known, why are their names not in the indictment? Why are they not being charged? Why are they not on the FBI's 10 most wanted list? The answer could not be more clear: The conspirators are agents of the U.S .Government. Hence, the reluctancy to bring this charge. I remain sceptical that this matter will ever proceed to trial. The trial would be too damaging to the propaganda campaign of the U.S. Government. If somehow it does happen, I will be there everyday, front row center and I will make a victim impact statement.

As I indicated on January 28, 2010, the Sharp Dressed Man was indeed a U.S. Government agent. To those of you that supported me over the last year, I thank you. God knows that there were times when I needed it. To those of you who doubted me, it's time for your Christmas dinner and crow is being served.

More Haskell info and video here: Eyewitness Spoof Links Chertoff Body Scanners to Underwear Bomber Plot

The Chinese Military Buildup and The Art of War

2010-12-31T06:43:00.000-06:00

UK Telegraph - China preparing for armed conflict 'in every direction'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/...-direction.html

QUOTE

"In the coming five years, our military will push forward preparations for military conflict in every strategic direction," said (defence minister) Liang Guanglie in an interview published by several state-backed newspapers in China. "We may be living in peaceful times, but we can never forget war, never send the horses south or put the bayonets and guns away," Mr Liang added.
...
Mr Liang's remarks come at a time of increasingly difficult relations between the Chinese and US armed forces which a three-day visit by his counterpart Robert Gates is intended to address.
...
Gates warned that China's new weapons, including its carrier-killing missile, "threaten America's primary way to project power and help allies in the Pacific", underscoring the difficulties that lie ahead as China and the US seek to contain growing strategic frictions.
...
"The modernisation of the Chinese military cannot depend on others, and cannot be bought," Mr Liang added, "In the next five years, our economy and society will develop faster, boosting comprehensive national power. We will take the opportunity and speed up modernisation of the military."

SUN-TZU: THE PRINCIPLES OF WARFARE "THE ART OF WAR"
http://www.sonshi.com/sun1.html

Chapter One: Calculation
Warfare is a great matter to a nation; it is the ground of death and of life; it is the way of survival and of destruction, and must be examined.

Therefore, go through it by means of five factors; compare them by means of calculation, and determine their statuses:
(1) The Way (public opinion) (2) Heaven (the weather) (3) Ground (the terrain) (4) General (the leadership) (5) Law (discipline)

All these five no general has not heard; one who knows them is victorious, one who does not know them is not victorious.
A general who listens to my calculations, and uses them, will surely be victorious, keep him; a general who does not listen to my calculations, and does not use them, will surely be defeated, remove him.

Calculate advantages by means of what was heard, then create force in order to assist outside missions.

Before doing battle, in the temple one calculates and will win, because many calculations were made; before doing battle, in the temple one calculates and will not win, because few calculations were made; many calculations, victory, few calculations, no victory, then how much less so when no calculations?

By means of these, I can observe them, beholding victory or defeat!

Chapter Seven: Armed Struggle
The general receives his commands from the ruler, assembles the troops, mobilizes the army, and sets up camp.
There is nothing more difficult than armed struggle.

Chapter Eight: Nine Changes
So the principles of warfare are:
Do not trust that the enemy isn't coming. Trust your readiness to meet him.
Do not depend on the enemy not attacking, but depend on our position that cannot be attacked.

I could go on and on about Sun Tzu and the behavior of the Chinese leadership - the point is: The Art Of War is their play book and thus they are always seeking ways to win in battle according to Sun Tzu's calculations. When their calculations assure them of victory - expect them to act as it is written "like a streaking rabbit".

The Federal Reserve Is Owned By Private Banks - Did You Know?

2010-12-29T16:34:00.003-06:00

Who Owns The Federal Reserve?
The Fed is privately owned. Its shareholders are private banks
by Ellen Brown
Global Research, October 8, 2008

"Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders." – The Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1930s

The Federal Reserve (or Fed) has assumed sweeping new powers in the last year. In an unprecedented move in March 2008, the New York Fed advanced the funds for JPMorgan Chase Bank to buy investment bank Bear Stearns for pennies on the dollar. The deal was particularly controversial because Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, sits on the board of the New York Fed and participated in the secret weekend negotiations.1 In September 2008, the Federal Reserve did something even more unprecedented, when it bought the world’s largest insurance company. The Fed announced on September 16 that it was giving an $85 billion loan to American International Group (AIG) for a nearly 80% stake in the mega-insurer. The Associated Press called it a "government takeover," but this was no ordinary nationalization. Unlike the U.S. Treasury, which took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the week before, the Fed is not a government-owned agency. Also unprecedented was the way the deal was funded. The Associated Press reported:

"The Treasury Department, for the first time in its history, said it would begin selling bonds for the Federal Reserve in an effort to help the central bank deal with its unprecedented borrowing needs."2

This is extraordinary. Why is the Treasury issuing U.S. government bonds (or debt) to fund the Fed, which is itself supposedly "the lender of last resort" created to fund the banks and the federal government? Yahoo Finance reported on September 17:

"The Treasury is setting up a temporary financing program at the Fed’s request. The program will auction Treasury bills to raise cash for the Fed’s use. The initiative aims to help the Fed manage its balance sheet following its efforts to enhance its liquidity facilities over the previous few quarters."

Normally, the Fed swaps green pieces of paper called Federal Reserve Notes for pink pieces of paper called U.S. bonds (the federal government’s I.O.U.s), in order to provide Congress with the dollars it cannot raise through taxes. Now, it seems, the government is issuing bonds, not for its own use, but for the use of the Fed! Perhaps the plan is to swap them with the banks’ dodgy derivatives collateral directly, without actually putting them up for sale to outside buyers. According to Wikipedia (which translates Fedspeak into somewhat clearer terms than the Fed’s own website):

"The Term Securities Lending Facility is a 28-day facility that will offer Treasury general collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s primary dealers in exchange for other program-eligible collateral. It is intended to promote liquidity in the financing markets for Treasury and other collateral and thus to foster the functioning of financial markets more generally. . . . The resource allows dealers to switch debt that is less liquid for U.S. government securities that are easily tradable."

"To switch debt that is less liquid for U.S. government securities that are easily tradable" means that the government gets the banks’ toxic derivative debt, and the banks get the government’s triple-A securities. Unlike the risky derivative debt, federal securities are considered "risk-free" for purposes of determining capital requirements, allowing the banks to improve their capital position so they can make new loans. (See E. Brown, "Bailout Bedlam," webofdebt.com/articles, October 2, 2008.)

In its latest power play, on October 3, 2008, the Fed acquired the ability to pay interest to its member banks on the reserves the banks maintain at the Fed. Reuters reported on October 3:

"The U.S. Federal Reserve gained a key tactical tool from the $700 billion financial rescue package signed into law on Friday that will help it channel funds into parched credit markets. Tucked into the 451-page bill is a provision that lets the Fed pay interest on the reserves banks are required to hold at the central bank."3

If the Fed’s money comes ultimately from the taxpayers, that means we the taxpayers are paying interest to the banks on the banks’ own reserves – reserves maintained for their own private profit. These increasingly controversial encroachments on the public purse warrant a closer look at the central banking scheme itself. Who owns the Federal Reserve, who actually controls it, where does it get its money, and whose interests is it serving?

Not Private and Not for Profit?

The Fed’s website insists that it is not a private corporation, is not operated for profit, and is not funded by Congress. But is that true? The Federal Reserve was set up in 1913 as a "lender of last resort" to backstop bank runs, following a particularly bad bank panic in 1907. The Fed’s mandate was then and continues to be to keep the private banking system intact; and that means keeping intact the system’s most valuable asset, a monopoly on creating the national money supply. Except for coins, every dollar in circulation is now created privately as a debt to the Federal Reserve or the banking system it heads.4 The Fed’s website attempts to gloss over its role as chief defender and protector of this private banking club, but let’s take a closer look.

The website states:

* "The twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by Congress as the operating arms of the nation’s central banking system, are organized much like private corporations – possibly leading to some confusion about "ownership." For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks. However, owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan; dividends are, by law, 6 percent per year."

* "[The Federal Reserve] is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms."

* "The Federal Reserve’s income is derived primarily from the interest on U.S. government securities that it has acquired through open market operations. . . . After paying its expenses, the Federal Reserve turns the rest of its earnings over to the U.S. Treasury."5

So let’s review:

1. The Fed is privately owned.

Its shareholders are private banks. In fact, 100% of its shareholders are private banks. None of its stock is owned by the government.

2. The fact that the Fed does not get "appropriations" from Congress basically means that it gets its money from Congress without congressional approval, by engaging in "open market operations."

Here is how it works: When the government is short of funds, the Treasury issues bonds and delivers them to bond dealers, which auction them off. When the Fed wants to "expand the money supply" (create money), it steps in and buys bonds from these dealers with newly-issued dollars acquired by the Fed for the cost of writing them into an account on a computer screen. These maneuvers are called "open market operations" because the Fed buys the bonds on the "open market" from the bond dealers. The bonds then become the "reserves" that the banking establishment uses to back its loans. In another bit of sleight of hand known as "fractional reserve" lending, the same reserves are lent many times over, further expanding the money supply, generating interest for the banks with each loan. It was this money-creating process that prompted Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1960s, to call the Federal Reserve "a total money-making machine." He wrote:

"When the Federal Reserve writes a check for a government bond it does exactly what any bank does, it creates money, it created money purely and simply by writing a check."

3. The Fed generates profits for its shareholders.

The interest on bonds acquired with its newly-issued Federal Reserve Notes pays the Fed’s operating expenses plus a guaranteed 6% return to its banker shareholders. A mere 6% a year may not be considered a profit in the world of Wall Street high finance, but most businesses that manage to cover all their expenses and give their shareholders a guaranteed 6% return are considered "for profit" corporations.

In addition to this guaranteed 6%, the banks will now be getting interest from the taxpayers on their "reserves." The basic reserve requirement set by the Federal Reserve is 10%. The website of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York explains that as money is redeposited and relent throughout the banking system, this 10% held in "reserve" can be fanned into ten times that sum in loans; that is, $10,000 in reserves becomes $100,000 in loans. Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.8 puts the total "loans and leases in bank credit" as of September 24, 2008 at $7,049 billion. Ten percent of that is $700 billion. That means we the taxpayers will be paying interest to the banks on at least $700 billion annually – this so that the banks can retain the reserves to accumulate interest on ten times that sum in loans.

The banks earn these returns from the taxpayers for the privilege of having the banks’ interests protected by an all-powerful independent private central bank, even when those interests may be opposed to the taxpayers’ -- for example, when the banks use their special status as private money creators to fund speculative derivative schemes that threaten to collapse the U.S. economy. Among other special benefits, banks and other financial institutions (but not other corporations) can borrow at the low Fed funds rate of about 2%. They can then turn around and put this money into 30-year Treasury bonds at 4.5%, earning an immediate 2.5% from the taxpayers, just by virtue of their position as favored banks. A long list of banks (but not other corporations) is also now protected from the short selling that can crash the price of other stocks.

Time to Change the Statute?

According to the Fed’s website, the control Congress has over the Federal Reserve is limited to this:

"[T]he Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute."

As we know from watching the business news, "oversight" basically means that Congress gets to see the results when it’s over.

Here's a video of our congressional oversight in action-

Related videos here: Expletive Spewing Robots Expose Federal Reserve

The Fed periodically reports to Congress, but the Fed doesn’t ask; it tells. The only real leverage Congress has over the Fed is that it "can alter its responsibilities by statute." It is time for Congress to exercise that leverage and make the Federal Reserve a truly federal agency, acting by and for the people through their elected representatives. If the Fed can demand AIG’s stock in return for an $85 billion loan to the mega-insurer, we can demand the Fed’s stock in return for the trillion-or-so dollars we’ll be advancing to bail out the private banking system from its follies.

If the Fed were actually a federal agency, the government could issue U.S. legal tender directly, avoiding an unnecessary interest-bearing debt to private middlemen who create the money out of thin air themselves. Among other benefits to the taxpayers. a truly "federal" Federal Reserve could lend the full faith and credit of the United States to state and local governments interest-free, cutting the cost of infrastructure in half, restoring the thriving local economies of earlier decades.

Ellen Brown, J.D., developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and "the money trust." She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her eleven books include the bestselling Nature’s Pharmacy, co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker, and Forbidden Medicine. Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com

Media Proclaimed "Most Productive Congress In History" Earns Worst Approval Rating in History

2010-12-27T16:04:00.003-06:00

If your only media outlet is mainstream television then you have probably heard it reported - "This is the most productive congress in American history".

Could it be that 87% of the population obtains their news elsewhere?

Congress' Job Approval Rating Worst in Gallup History
Thirteen percent approve of the way Congress is handling its job

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans' assessment of Congress has hit a new low, with 13% saying they approve of the way Congress is handling its job. The 83% disapproval rating is also the worst Gallup has measured in more than 30 years of tracking congressional job performance.

The prior low approval rating for Congress was 14% in July 2008 when the United States was dealing with record-high gas prices and the economy was in recession.

Read the rest of the Gallup report HERE. Hat tip SharpElbows.

The Infamous MIAC Report - You Might Be A Terrorist If...

2010-12-25T19:57:00.002-06:00

Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists
http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/

According to the report linked above - If you watch this movie...

and / or this movie:

You might be a terrorist.

If you display this flag:

You might be a terrorist.

If you are a Libertarian Christian who "argues that the government has gotten away from the intent of the Constitution"... You guessed it... You might be a terrorist.

But if you happen to be this guy - "the first American on the CIA's kill or capture list"...

American-born Al Qaeda-linked cleric Anwar al-Awlaki

According to Fox News - you have dined at the Pentagon.

EXCLUSIVE: Al Qaeda Leader Dined at the Pentagon Just Months After 9/11
By Catherine Herridge
Published October 20, 2010
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/10/20/al-qaeda-terror-leader-dined-pentagon-months/

As unbelievable as it may seem... everything written in this post is true. Follow the links to see for yourself.

Don't tread on me flag photo credit - futureatlas, Anwar al-Awlaki photo credit - Fox News.

Fighting the Mainstream Media Machine - Revealing the Truth about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange

2010-12-24T07:51:00.001-06:00

Zenpundit.com recently posted an article titled Martyrdom, messianism and Julian Assange. The title speaks for itself. At the end, I was mildly disturbed by one reader's comment and felt compelled to respond.

The comment- "Your need to destroy Assange is getting embarrassing. Why not make lemonaid?" My response-

People have to learn the real story behind this media-created character Julian Assange. It is not embarrassing to go "on alert" when something is obviously wrong with someone or something. In fact, it is natural and correct to alert others to a dangerous situation. Make no mistake, the WikiLeaks situation (and Julian Assange) is dangerous - for reasons you will not see reported in the mainstream media. Links-

Article - The WikiLeaks Trap - Don’t fall for it!
Kish Collections: The WikiLeaks Trap - Don’t fall for it!

Message board post that outlines leads into the past of WikiLeaks-
Huge Wikileak document dump - TFP

If We Lose our Internet Freedoms Because of Wikileaks, You Should At Least Know Why « American Everyman

Activist Post: BREAKING: WikiLeaks Being Used to Justify "Patriot Act" Legislation For Internet

Kish Collections: Media Hypes New WikiLeaks Front Man - John Young

“Trying to Explain the World” – How the Globalist’s PR Agents Use the Wikileaks Psyops Program « American Everyman

Journalists at Pentagon daily barred from WikiLeaks

DRUDGE HEADLINE - UN PLANS INTERNET REGULATION
UN mulls internet regulation optionsWikiLeaks sparks push for tighter controls.
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051,un-mu…on-options.aspx

Keep up the great work Zenpundit - you are on the right track.

Note: In the first linked article above, pay special attention to the quote from Andy Greenberg which was published in a Forbes article.

"Admire him or revile him, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange is the prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency, the leader of an organization devoted to divulging the world’s secrets using technology unimagined a generation ago."

People must maintain perspective -

"Prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency"? Assange is a guy with a web site. The real story here should be about the data - and who is helping Assange - not Assange himself.

Maxine on ObamaCare

2010-12-22T20:50:00.000-06:00

This is forwarding about the emailsphere-

Let me get this straight . . . .
We're going to be "gifted" with a health care
plan we are forced to purchase and
fined if we don't,
Which purportedly covers at least
ten million more people,
without adding a single new doctor,
but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents,
written by a committee whose chairman
says he doesn't understand it,
passed by a Congress that didn't read it but
exempted themselves from it,
and signed by a President who smokes,
with funding administered by a treasury chief who
didn't pay his taxes,
for which we'll be taxed for four years before any
benefits take effect,
by a government which has
already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,
all to be overseen by a surgeon general
who is obese,
and financed by a country that's broke!!!!!
'What could possibly go wrong?'

China Confirms Construction of Aircraft Carrier Warship - Fleet Expected By 2020

2010-12-18T08:44:00.000-06:00

The Varyag, an aircraft carrier from the Soviet Union,
is being remodeled at China's Dalian Port.

China reveals aircraft carrier plans - FT.com
China has confirmed for the first time that it is preparing to build an aircraft carrier, a move set to heighten international concerns over the rapid expansion of its naval power.

Chinese Aircraft Carrier Buildup- The Significance
The US Defense Department reported in early 2009 that China's PLA Navy "is considering building multiple carriers by 2020".

In 2006, Lt Col Christopher J. Pehrson highlighted the significance of the U.S. aircraft carrier fleet...

QUOTE

American warships have a combined displacement of 2.86 million tons whereas the PLAN’s combined fleet has a displacement of only 263 thousand tons. Of the world’s 34 aircraft carriers, 24 are U.S. Navy vessels, while China possesses none. This traditional “blue water” navy, centered on the aircraft carrier, is one of America’s greatest military strengths.

Documents Confirm China's Aircraft Carrier Plans
China is believed to be building two 50,000-60,000-ton aircraft carriers at Changxingdao Shipyard, the world's biggest, in Shanghai and is expected to launch one in 2014.

It is also reportedly working on remodeling the 58,500-ton Varyag, an aircraft carrier the former Soviet Union had stopped building, at Dalian Port to launch it in 2012. The country is expected to get a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier by 2020.

The Japanese government's new defense white paper to be published on Friday will reflect worries about China's buildup of maritime power.

Citizen Evicted From His Own 36 Acres Because He Has No City Electricity, Water or Sewage

2010-12-17T05:44:00.001-06:00

Alexandria is a small town in Madison County Indiana (Northeast of Indianapolis) where apparently now it is illegal to live free on your own land. Big brother at the county board says - plug in or pull out. U.S. citizen landowner Dick Thompson was asked "Where are you going to go?". He replied - "I have no idea".

Author: Mac Slavo

Think you can do whatever you want on your land, even if it doesn’t violate the rights of others?

Think again.

72 year old Dick Thompson likes the simple life. He has no city electricity, water or sewage, and now the county has evicted him from his own land, about 36 acres, because he refuses to acquire these necessary services. The county attorney says, “Thompson is breaking too many rules, laws and ordinances” :

Mr. Thompson just wants to be left alone. Karl Denninger weighs in with his thoughts:

I’m sure that on that 38 acres there are more deer and other wildlife that whizzes and craps a larger volume (by far) than one man. There’s no public safety issue here - this is one man, on his own property, with no evidence that he’s polluting anything around him, who simply wants to be left alone - and who clearly isn’t interested in “improving” his land and thus paying ten times as much in property taxes and “mandatory” services.
That’s really the rub here, isn’t it? The county wants to evict him not due to any sort of danger, but rather because he refuses to build a big fat McMansion on that land and then suck down the kilowatts and pay for every gallon of water twice - one to deliver it, again to cart it away even if he chooses to do things with the water that don’t require those gallons to be carted away.
Show me where this individual is actually harming the public’s safety and I’ll agree with the jackboot of government coming in to tell him how he has to live.

Good luck living simply, living free, and living without being bothered in the New America.

Author: Mac Slavo
Date: December 16th, 2010
Visit the Author's Website: http://www.SHTFplan.com/

Military Police Detain Citizen Reporter and Crew at Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Trial

2010-12-15T20:31:00.000-06:00

Dr. James David Manning of The Manning Report is claiming that he and his crew were detained and prevented from attending the Lt Col Terry Lakin court martial trial.

"I and my camera crew while attending the Lt. Col. Terry Lakin trial was detained by military police and threatened with trespassing charges here in Ft Meade Md. We were interrogated for nearly three hours, searched, ask to sign statements and read the Miranda right . They placed us in separate rooms for interrogation, and Capt Farr was placed in a cell block room. They released us after the trial was over."

According to Manning, Lt. Col. Lakin was found guilty of felony charge on “Missing Movement” and he plead guilty to the refusal to obey a direct chain of command order. Court is now in sentencing phase.

Source - http://atlahmedianetwork.org/?page_id=65

Lt. Col. Lakin is the Army doctor who, in his 18th year of active duty service, refused deployment to Afghanistan because he did not believe that President Obama was born in the United States. He made the choice to take a stand and not to follow what he believed were illegal orders. Now it appears that he will pay the price.

YouTube publisher LoneStar1776 wrote - "LTC Terry Lakin has tried in vain to get the same verification from our President that he has been asked to provide countless times in his career, for many jobs, and to obtain a security clearance for the trusted positions he has held within the U.S. Armed Forces."

In related news - WND recently reported that, concerning WikiLeaks, Gov. Mike Huckabee (2008 presidential candidate) said:

"If we want to keep our nation's secrets 'SECRET,' store them where President Obama stores his college transcripts and birth certificate."

Media Hypes New WikiLeaks Front Man - John Young

2010-12-11T06:58:00.001-06:00

On the same day as Julian Assange's arrest (December 7, 2010) an article ran in The New York Observer - seemingly on cue. The article, titled The Original WikiLeaker, introduced a new and "more credible" front man for the leaking community. Exit Assange, stage left - enter cryptome.org founder John Young, “the original Wikileaker.” For those of us who suspect that the entire WikiLeaks situation is orchestrated - the timing is impeccable.

One reason John Young appears more credible than Assange is his background, another is his demeanor. Wikipedia says of John Young -

In 2007 John Young, operator of cryptome, left his position on the WikiLeaks Board of Directors accusing the group of being a "CIA conduit." Young subsequently retreated from his assertion but has continued to be critical of the site. In a 2010 interview with CNET.com Young accused the group of a lack of transparency regarding their fundraising and financial management. He went on to state his belief that WikiLeaks could not guarantee whistleblowers the anonymity or confidentiality they claimed and that he "would not trust them with information if it had any value, or if it put me at risk or anyone that I cared about at risk."

Now, still in the same week of Assanges's exit, John Young has also appeared on The Alex Jones Show. Critical question - Is this, a legitimate interview or an attempt to build "street cred" within Jones's audience - an audience well known for its skepticism? Keep this in mind - if Young can successfully break into the alternative media cult with his message - it will resonate.

Young's message appears as the following in the Alex Jones appearance -

1) The leaking community cannot be stopped (without shutting down the internet).
2) The information leaked is credible. For example, in the Alex Jones interview, Young described attempts by the leaking community to "authenticate" the Bank of America hard drive before its release.
3) The leaking community at its core means well.
4) The leaking community, although created by the intelligence services, has, for the most part, turned on its master - gone rouge. "The people that are actually running it, that they hired to run it, are now reversing the panopticon."
5) WikiLeaks is a business (set up for profit - not for public benefit - "money is pouring in from both sides") but the leaking community itself is larger than WikiLeaks. (Young seems to be creating separation between the leaking community and WikiLeaks which will serve well in the continuance of leaks from other sources if/when WikiLeaks is shut down.)
6) The leaking community is extremely intelligent - more intelligent than the governments or organizations that fund them.
7) The leaking community is not truly independent. It is not a government agency, and it is not a combine - "it is none of those. The intent was to have nothing that could be attacked easily. So it is not an organization, it is not an entity. It's a concept, it's an asperation. It's a goal. It is not anything you are going to be able to take down by the usual means... WikiLeaks will not be taken down. It will pop up some other way".

Young's points, when viewed as a whole, appear intent on bolstering trust in the leaking community. Each of these points additionally should be viewed in John Young's own words -

We'll it is what I was told as a kid. Trust no one but yourself and warn people not to trust you. We say at cryptome, do not trust us. Through our ignorance we may deceive you or betray you. Do not trust anyone who speaks with a voice of authority and do not trust anyone who sells you protection. Do not trust anyone who sells you trust. Because their own ignorance and venality will betray you... We've got a lot of talk from people who are well known liars. And most hackers are liars because that is how they social engineer. Most people on the internet lie. I lie. Are you hearing me? I lie. I'm lying to you right now. Keep that in mind. Everyone's got their agenda...

The show must go on. Also, in the Alex Jones appearance, John Young introduced a new cast of characters (the leaking community) and offered a lineup of coming episodes - both of which were published in the accompanying INFOWARS.com article.

Wikileaks Founder: Bigger Bombshells On The Way
http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-founder-bigger-bombshells-on-the-way/

According to Young, the new characters are listed on Wikipedia as "Cypherpunks". And, the coming episodes (roster of new releases "leaks" forthcoming) are as follows.

- Information about the internal affairs of Bank of America
- Files on weapons of mass destruction
- War plans of all nations, for and against one another
- Reports and training literature on black site prisons and torture chambers
- Files about clandestine spy agencies and their operatives
- Files on human rights abuses
- Files about billionaire political meddlers
- Files about global tax collection agencies
- Files about the Vatican’s meddling in global political affairs
- Information about the Clinton Foundation, although this was the only one on which Young wasn’t certain.

One thing is for certain - the media theater shall continue.

The Secret Behind Ted Turner’s Call For A Global One Child Policy

2010-12-08T03:32:00.000-06:00

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com

Just months after a leaked UN blueprint that revealed climate change alarmists would start pushing “overpopulation” fears in favor of the discredited mantra of global warming as a means of dismantling the middle class, billionaire globalist Ted Turner followed suit during a Cancun luncheon yesterday when he urged the world to adopt China’s brutal one-child policy, and even suggested poor people should be sterilized in return for government handouts.

Following a speech by economist Brian O’Neill from the U.S.’s National Center for Atmospheric Research which “concluded that a rapidly rising global population is contributing to an acceleration of emission growth,” Uncle Ted stepped in to remind us that mere slaves should not aspire to follow his example of having five children, restricting themselves to one or being made to face the wrath of a Chinese-style one child policy, which sends women who defy its edicts to “re-education camps,” once they have been beaten, forcibly injected and had their baby boiled alive inside their womb of course.

“Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control – said the environmental stress on the Earth requires radical solutions, suggesting countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce,” reports the Globe and Mail.

The secret behind Turner’s call for western nations to enforce a tyrannical policy that in China is administered by undercover police and “family planning” authorities who kidnap, force drug and then forcibly abort babies of pregnant women, has nothing whatsoever to do with his concern for the environment.

Turner himself has five children and owns no less than 2 million acres of land. He is the largest private landowner on the planet, falling short of only the royal families of Europe. Turner has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%, a figure only achievable by outright genocide, mass abortion and infanticide.

In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population reduction, namely through United Nations programs, leading the way for the likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates’ father has long been a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist). Gates himself has given speeches in which he promotes the use of vaccines and abortion as a means of reducing global population and lowering CO2 emissions.

Quite how an improvement in health care through vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates was referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial “planetary regime” to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

This is what Gates and Turner discussed when they met in secret with the likes of George Soros and David Rockefeller at a private gathering of billionaires in Manhattan last year, a confab focused around how these globalists could use their wealth to “slow the growth of the world’s population.”

As is manifestly provable, the true agenda behind fanning the flames of fears about overpopulation is to reduce living standards globally, by preventing the third world from ever becoming economically prosperous, while also eviscerating the middle classes of western nations. It has nothing whatsoever to do with saving the earth and is merely another convenient trojan horse that globalists invoke to advance their tyranny.

This fact was admitted in a leaked UN blueprint which emerged in September. The document called for alarmists to push “overpopulation” as a replacement for “climate change,” while conceding that the ultimate goal was to “limit and redirect the aspirations for a better life of rising middle classes around the world,” in other words, to convince the masses that they will have to be content with a state of near poverty in order to save the planet from armageddon. Although Uncle Ted will get to keep his 2 million acres and his five kids will go on to procreate ad infinitum, naturally.

Overpopulation is a myth. The UN’s own figures clearly indicate that population is set to stabilize in 2020 and then drop dramatically after 2050. As the Economist reported, “Fertility is falling and families are shrinking in places— such as Brazil, Indonesia, and even parts of India—that people think of as teeming with children. As our briefing shows, the fertility rate of half the world is now 2.1 or less—the magic number that is consistent with a stable population and is usually called “the replacement rate of fertility”. Sometime between 2020 and 2050 the world’s fertility rate will fall below the global replacement rate.”

To emphasize, not only do the numbers clearly indicate that overpopulation is a contrived scare, but the scaremongers themselves have been caught admitting that they are fanning the fears in order to reduce living standards in the west and consequently set in motion a “global redistribution of wealth.”

And don’t for a second be fooled into thinking that this so-called “global redistribution of wealth” will manifest some kind of socialist utopia. As was uncovered during the Copenhagen summit, the program of “global redistribution of wealth” largely centers around looting the wealth of the middle classes in richer countries through carbon taxes and then using that money to bankroll the construction of world government. As the leaked “Danish text” revealed, the money generated from consumption taxes will go directly to the World Bank, not to developing countries.

Let me emphasize again, even if you believe the claptrap circulated about overpopulation, the men being empowered to “solve the problem” have stated that their primary goal is to kill 95 per cent of humanity while destroying prosperity and economic freedom in the west, as well as ensuring that the third world remains in mountains of debt to the World Bank and IMF.

This is akin to hiring Ted Bundy to spearhead a program aimed at alleviating an epidemic of physical abuse towards women. It would be like appointing Charlie Manson the leader of a teen summer camp.

Ted Turner is a billionaire industrialist with five kids, 2 million acres of land and a network of business interests that combined must spew more carbon dioxide in a year than all the people reading this article put together in a lifetime could manage. And he is telling you to make sacrifices, to not have children, to sell your reproductive rights and be sterilized, to reduce yourliving standards, just like Al Gores flaps his gums about rising sea levels caused by global warming while purchasing oceanside property worth millions of dollars.

How much more evidence will it take for people to accept the fact that overpopulation is a myth and that it has been hijacked by global warming alarmists who are now using it as a replacement for the discredited science of man-made climate change in order to build their new world order, which is based entirely around squeezing the middle class and making people more dependent on big government, thereby becoming the architects of their own enslavement and being forced to crawl cap-in-hand to the likes of Uncle Ted and beg for a dime.

When Good Men Do Nothing

2010-12-05T17:56:00.000-06:00

By Wayne Greeson

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

So much of the history of the struggle between good and evil can be explained by Edmund Burke's observation. Time and again those who profess to be good seem to clearly outnumber those who are evil, yet those who are evil seem to prevail far too often. Seldom is it the numbers that determine the outcome, but whether those who claim to be good men are willing to stand up and fight for what they know to be right. There are numerous examples of this sad and awful scenario being played out over and over again in the scriptures.

They Get Nothing Good Done

When good men do nothing, they get nothing good done. To be good, one must do good. The Lord commands his people to do good (Luke 6:35; Eph. 2:10). Christ "gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works" (Titus 2:14).

In the parable of the talents, Jesus described a man who did nothing. When he received his Lord's money, he "went and digged in the earth, and hid his Lord's money" (Matt. 25:18). When his Lord returned, he returned to the Lord just what he had been given (Matt. 25:25). Notice, the servant did not do any outright evil, such as stealing the money, but then neither did he do anything good. He did nothing and he got nothing good accomplished. Jesus said he was a "wicked and slothful servant" (Matt. 25:26).

Jesus rebuked the church at Laodicea for doing nothing. "I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked" (Rev. 3:15-17).

Too many Christians and too many churches do nothing. They are standing idly by, they are mere spectators. They sit on the sidelines instead of actively participating and working for the good. If good wins, they join in the celebration though they did nothing to produce the victory. If evil wins, they will complain long and loud though their own apathy helped produce the undesirable result.

When Jesus found a fig tree with "nothing thereon, but leaves only" He cursed the tree and "presently the fig tree withered away" (Matt. 21:19). What will He do with those who claim to be good and yet who do nothing? John the baptist warned, "And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 3:10; John 15:2).

They Help Evil To Triumph

When good men do nothing, evil triumphs. Evil, sin and sinful men must be opposed. God commands those who are good, not just to avoid evil but actively oppose it.

Christians are to not only to "have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but (also) reprove them" (Eph. 5:11). Those who do nothing about sin and evil, help the sin and evil to prevail. One who is silent when there are those around him in sin becomes a partaker with them (Eph. 5:7).

In the days of Elijah, the silence of many had allowed the evil of Ahab and Jezebel to prevail throughout the land of Israel. "And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? If the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word" (1 Kings 18:21). The silence of the people spoke volumes of their indecisiveness and inaction. Their failure to stand up, speak up and speak out permitted wicked and evil men to run rampant.

Jesus told of a traveler who was robbed, beaten and left him half dead. The men who did this were wicked and did a very wicked thing. But the Levite and priest allowed this evil to continue unanswered by doing nothing as they each "passed by on the other side" (Luke 10:31-32). Fortunately for the traveler there was one man, a Samaritan, who was willing to stand up for what was right (Luke 10:33-36).

Jesus warned "He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad" (Matt. 12:30). In the fight against evil there is no middle ground, no gray area, no neutrality. Those who are not actively and vigorously fighting against evil are helping evil to triumph.

They Are No Longer Good

When good men do nothing, they are no longer good. Many have the mistaken notion that good is merely the absence of doing that which is wrong. Not so! One is good not merely because he does no evil, but because he is actively working for what is good. "Let him eschew evil, and do good" (1 Pet. 3:11). James explained, "Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin" (James 4:17).

The eldest of Israel, Reuben, knew his brothers' murderous plot against their younger brother Joseph was wrong. He started an attempt to deliver Joseph, but as he hesitated and vacillated, the other brothers sold Joseph into slavery. When Reuben heard what they had done, he realized his failure to act had helped to bring about this evil result.

Instead of correcting his error, Reuben sought to cover his guilt by agreeing with his brothers to lie to their father about Joseph's disappearance (Gen. 37:18-35). Reuben had "good intentions" and he was not even present when Joseph was sold into slavery, but he knew his inaction and absence made him just as guilty as the rest of his wicked brothers. This guilt continued to haunt him through the years (Gen. 42:21-22).

The prophet Obadiah severely condemned the Edomites for doing nothing when evil was befalling their brethren, the Jews. When Jerusalem was invaded by her enemies, the Edomites "stood on the other side" doing nothing but watching the slaughter as spectators. God said by their failure to act and to help their brethren "even thou wast as one of them" (Obad. 11).

Today, there are preachers and Christians who fail and refuse to meet the real foe, refute error and fight the enemy. Instead, they have turned to viciously savaging their own brethren. They are filled with bitterness and hatred and they maliciously attack, slander and misrepresent other Christians and gospel preachers.

Paul warned about such men and behavior among those professing to be Christians, "But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another" (Gal. 5:15). Those who engage in such behavior are spiritual cannibals.

While the conduct of these so-called Christians is shameful, what about those supposedly "good" men who do nothing? Those stand on the other side and do nothing but watch as their brothers are being slandered, slaughtered and devoured, they cease being innocent bystanders and idle spectators. Their failure to act not only allows evil to triumph, but makes them just as guilty as the spiritual cannibals they refuse to reprove and rebuke. In God's words, "even thou wast as one of them" (Obad. 11).

Conclusion

"Be not deceived; God is not mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap" (Gal. 6:7). Those who fail or refuse to do good in the face of evil are sowing some dangerous seeds. They are doing nothing good as Jesus commanded them to do; they are helping evil to win and have ceased being good and have become partakers of the evil they did nothing to stop.

Do not allow evil to triumph. Do not sit by and do nothing. Stand up and be counted, speak up against evil and speak out against evil men and their sinful deeds.

Source : http://www.padfield.com/1997/goodmen.html
The Church of Christ in Zion, Illinois
David Padfield - Evangelist
www.padfield.com

The WikiLeaks Trap - Don't fall for it!

2010-12-02T06:48:00.001-06:00

A Kish Collections special report - by J.N. Kish

On the heels of “cablegate”, the WikiLeaks organization is coming into clear focus. WikiLeaks is part of an elaborate information / disinformation campaign – a PSYOP. The so-called “information” from WikiLeaks is not to be trusted.

Psychological warfare - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psy-ops

Various techniques are used, by any set of groups, and aimed to influence a target audience's value systems, belief systems, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originator's objectives, and is sometimes combined with black operations or false flag tactics. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.

The U.S. Department of Defense defines psychological warfare as: "The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives."

PSYOPS, like physical weapons, can be good – when used for legitimate defense against “hostile foreign groups”. But when “achievement of national objectives” runs contrary to the will of the American people – well, we have a problem.

In the case of WikiLeaks – one of the related “national objectives” appears to be government seizure of the Internet.

Congress Back To Censoring Internet
http://blawgit.com/2010/11/17/congress-back-to-censoring-internet/comment-page-1/

Homeland Security Is Seizing Internet Domains Left And Right
http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wordpress/2010/11/homeland-security-is-seizing-internet-domains-left-and-right/

Web Censorship Bill Sails Through Senate Committee
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/11/coica-web-censorship-bill/

Google and YouTube Censor News - Ban Alex Jones
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/286/623/Google_and_YouTube_Censor_News_-_Ban_Alex_Jones.html

Communist / Fascist factions within our government are seeking public support in favor of an Internet crackdown. And now, with its “extremely dangerous” release of “leaked” United States embassy cables, Wikileaks is poised as an example - an example of a site that deserves to be shut down. The Wikileaks situation is part of a larger plan. It is likely these cables were intentionally leaked as a means to the end.

Citizen suspicions are mounting.

With the Internet in its current state, citizens are able quickly to share information and ideas. This sharing allows us to work together and figure out this kind of thing – a campaign like WikiLeaks. This is exactly the kind of freedom that the establishment is set to quell. The establishment is rapidly losing control of the media, and they desperately want it back. We now find ourselves in the throws of an all out “info war”. It’s a war for control of the Internet – waged between the representative republic (citizens), and would-be federal controllers. People are beginning to wake up to this reality.

WikiLeaks: A “staged” crime scene
http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/4304

One astute message board commenter wrote-

I think these factions are using Soviet style self-infliction tactics. Even John Bolton thinks something is fake about it, at least regarding the diplomat cables. On another note, it looks like a major bank is up next on the smear list. I'm assuming it'll be Wells Fargo since it's a politically right-leaning institution and it fought hard against being forced to take a bailout. It's a gut feeling but it could also be Citi or BoA. We'll see though.

It's much bigger than Julian Assange.

The second link in the message board comment is a Forbes article by Andy Greenberg that opens with this paragraph -

Admire him or revile him, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange is the prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency, the leader of an organization devoted to divulging the world’s secrets using technology unimagined a generation ago. Over the last year his information insurgency has dumped 76,000 secret Afghan war documents and another trove of 392,000 files from the Iraq war into the public domain–the largest classified military security breaches in history. Sunday, WikiLeaks made the first of 250,000 classified U.S. State Department cables public, offering an unprecedented view of how America’s top diplomats view enemies and friends alike.

"Prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency"? Assange is a guy with a web site. The real story here should be about the data - and who is helping Assange - not Assange himself. Without the data and the hosting servers - Assange and WikiLeaks would not be a story at all. Someone has to feed the data, and someone has to run the servers for WikiLeaks to exist. But here is the thing that really doesn't add up - Where does this guy earn his money? It can cost a lot of money to keep a high traffic server up and running. Who is paying for his hosting costs?

The following article sheds some light-
WikiLeaks host linked to Pirate Bay
http://www.3news.co.nz/WikiLeaks-host-link...rticleID=169480
Key excerpts –

A Swedish internet company linked to file-sharing hub The Pirate Bay says it's helping online whistle-blower WikiLeaks release classified documents from servers located in a Stockholm suburb.

Mikael Viborg, the owner of the web hosting company PRQ, on Friday showed The Associated Press the site - the basement of a drab office building - in Solna on the condition that the exact location was not revealed.

The secretive website gives few details about its setup, but says its "servers are distributed over multiple international jurisdictions and do not keep logs. Hence these logs cannot be seized."

Viborg said WikiLeaks has servers outside Sweden, too.

"There are backups," he said. "If one goes down, there are others that take over."

Viborg said he was comfortable revealing the location in Solna because Swedish authorities already know where it is and have not tried to shut down the servers.

"Not so far," Viborg said... when you look at the legal situation it's hard to see that Swedish authorities can tell us to do anything, legally.

"They can ask us to do it out of goodwill, but I can tell you right now that we won't oblige."

Swedish Foreign Ministry spokesman Anders Jorle said the government had not been contacted by the United States about the WikiLeaks servers and had no plans to get involved in the matter. Any decision to intervene would have to be taken by Sweden's justice system, he said.

Sweden's staunch protection of the freedom of expression has made it a sanctuary for websites carrying politically sensitive information.

WikiLeaks recently posted a huge encrypted file named "Insurance" to its website, sparking speculation that those behind the organization may be prepared to release more classified information if authorities interfere with them.

He said PRQ had worked with WikiLeaks since 2008, but always through a Swedish middleman instead of direct contacts. PRQ doesn't own the WikiLeaks servers in Solna, but provides the Internet service, electricity and other services, including restarting the servers when needed, he added.

There is also this report that suggests “WikiLeaks site is being hosted on Amazon's ‘hack-proof’ servers right here in Washington”. This was later followed up by mainstream media reports from The Associated Press, CBS and ABC “that Amazon's servers had stopped hosting WikiLeaks”.

Assange is not working alone - he has help and is certainly not a "prophet".

However, fueled by the mainstream media (controlled hype), Assange and WikiLeaks are certainly being built up as much more than they really are. Why?

Who benefits from WikiLeaks?

Who is set up to benefit as this information / disinformation campaign progresses? The answer to this question will lead to a real understanding of the WikiLeaks situation.

In order to determine the answer, let’s begin with the opposite. Who doesn’t benefit? This one is easy – the common citizen. I can't think of a single thing that WikiLeaks has done to benefit me personally - can you?
However, it is possible to recall several things that have come about pursuant to WikiLeaks that have harmed the common man – from the beginning. WikiLeaks first major release "The Iraq War Logs" – included edited military footage of a helicopter assault in Iraq and was launched with a great amount of hype on the AP news wire.

The edited footage was highly deceptive and was apparently set up to foster Anti-American sentiment around the world (itself an initial deception for WikiLeaks to gain credibility in the global arena). The Scholars Stage said of the incident at the time -

WikiLeaks edited and presented this incident in a manner that can be called nothing but blatantly dishonest.

The blatant dishonesty harmed the morale of the common man – especially those serving in the U.S. military. This harm is documented in the Kish Collections article – A Tale of Three Videos.

Amazingly, the rebroadcast of this WikiLeaks video has also been cited as the reason cited for the Alex Jones You Tube ban.

Google and YouTube Censor News - Ban Alex Jones
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/11/google-and-youtube-censor-news-ban-alex.html

This ban is on course to restrict dissemination of information from the alternative news media – censorship. This restriction of freedom is again - harm to the common man. Each release of WikiLeaks “information” tends to lead to more establishment media control – and thus serves to answer the general question as to who benefits.

The Key Message -

No benefit = No value = Distraction

Don't waste your time on the WikiLeaks “information”. The WikiLeaks PSYOP campaign is part of the larger plan to seize control of free speech on the Internet and in the media. It’s part of the global war on free speech. It's a trap!

Please - focus instead on exposing the real people behind the WikiLeaks organization.

Parting notes and thoughts –

Wayne Madsen was interviewed on the 11/30/2010 Alex Jones Show – he suggested the possibility of a WikiLeaks connection to George Soros.

The WikiLeaks information is now being presented as true by the mainstream media even without a verifiable source – this is the real danger.

WikiLeaks - WikiPedia Link

The creators of WikiLeaks have not been formally identified.
How to leak a secret and not get caught
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19325865.500-how-to-leak-a-secret-and-not-get-caught.html

Why does WikiLeaks need a board of directors? Who serves (has served) on WikiLeaks board of directors? How much does it pay to serve on the board of WikiLeaks?

Who is funding WikiLeaks? Follow the money.

Google and YouTube Censor News - Ban Alex Jones

2010-11-30T05:03:00.001-06:00

Google's Motto - Don't Be Evil? Apparently, a struggle is ongoing within the Google organization as the company has chosen repeatedly to block news and information originating from Alex Jones and his web sites.

Infowars.com

Both Google and its subsidiary company You Tube have banned Alex Jones and his websites, as attempts to curtail free speech widen.

Within the past 2-3 weeks, Jones and his team have confirmed that after years of being listed under Google News, one of the largest platforms for news dissemination, that PrisonPlanet.com and Infowars.com have been blocked from its search results, effectively censoring their content from wide web coverage. Only smaller sites that re-post the content have appeared in Google searches since early November.

In a separate matter, TheAlexJonesChannel on YouTube has learned that it will be either frozen or blocked from uploading new content for several weeks following a “Community Guidelines” violation decision. According to YouTube’s support team, users from its site flagged a video on the channel that contained controversial video of the Apache helicopter “collateral murder” that occurred in Iraq in 2007 and was released by Wikileaks. When TheAlexJonesChannel attempted to challenge the removal of this video via YouTube’s counter-notification form, it was subsequently told that the account would be disabled and new content blocked (apparently due to the challenge, as no other strikes exist on the account).

The graphic content in the video– which documents real events the Pentagon never wanted released– has been posted by hundreds of other channels on YouTube, including major media outlets like CBS News and Russia Today without being flagged or removed, yet TheAlexJonesChannel has been told that its posting of a smaller portion of this incident is offensive or otherwise against its community guidelines. This appears to be double standard as even the age-verification barrier set-up for some of the postings was not offered for TheAlexJonesChannel version; it was simple deleted by user demand and YouTube mandate.
It is evident that the system revels in any chance to dampen the loud voice that Alex Jones, Infowars.com/PrisonPlanet.com and its supporters have raised on the Internet, effectively challenging the status quo and mainstream media spin on major news and events. With the easy passage of the web censorship bill, it is further clear that what is happening now to Infowars.com and Alex Jones will soon happen to anyone without a politically-correct message, particularly when that message is capable of resonating throughout large parts of the globe.

It is up to supporters and lovers of freedom to challenge censorship and oppression on the web, because only resistance can slow the attempts to curtail free speech and expression online. As Frederick Douglass said, “Find out just what the people will submit to and you’ve found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” This will be prove to be more true than ever in the age of the Internet.

If you are outraged or concerned about Internet Censorship - Visit the following article and sign the petition - Congress Back To Censoring Internet

God bless us all in our quest to resist evil.

Eyewitness Spoof Links Chertoff Body Scanners to Underwear Bomber Plot

2010-11-27T21:51:00.001-06:00

Last Christmas, Attorney Kurt Haskell and his wife were returning from Amsterdam on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 bound for Detroit. Shortly before landing, a lunatic terrorist (seated a few rows in front of the Haskell's) decided to ignite a package of explosives which he had allegedly hidden in the crotch of his pants. A hero dubbed The Flying Dutchman hurled himself onto the would-be bomber and extinguished the fire with his bare hands. The lives of everyone on the plane were saved and The Department of Homeland Security claimed "the system worked". -- This is popular legend of The Underwear Bomber. A legend which, in less than a year, has heralded the roll out of radiating full naked body scanners, enhanced "groping" pat downs, and serious repercussions including fines and arrest for those who do not submit. This, in turn, has led to a widespread media frenzy and public backlash. The latest salvo in the saga appears to be a new TSA administrative directive calling for opt-outers to be considered "Domestic Extremists".

Within all of this appears to be lost - the amazing story of the Haskell's as documented in the following articles.

THE TRUTH ABOUT FLIGHT 253 HAS BEEN REVEALED - By Kurt Haskell
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-about-flight-253-has-been.html

Flight 253 passenger: Sharp-dressed man aided terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab onto plane without passport (MLive.com exclusive)
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_says_at_l.html

Latest Story - By Kurt Haskell
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/latest-story-by-kurt-haskell.html

Bombshell Eyewitness Revelations: Confirmed FBI Cover-Up Of Flight 253 Attack
http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-eyewitness-revelations-confirmed-fbi-cover-up-of-flight-253-attack/

The Sharp Dressed Man Who Aided Mutallab Onto Flight 253 Was U.S. Government Agent
http://www.infowars.com/the-sharp-dressed-man-who-aided-mutallab-onto-flight-253-was-u-s-government-agent/

And now - victim turned activist Kurt Haskell shares his research and views in a newly-released spoof video embedded below. As you watch, keep in mind that Haskell, his wife and the remainder of the 278 passengers and 11 crew would have been blown out of the sky if the bombing was successful. To say he is motivated to reveal the truth would be an understatement. Kurt Haskell appears to be on a mission to understand and expose the entire story of the ordeal.

Kurt's Spoof on the Underwear Bomber
Video Kurt created discussing the Underwear Bomber with Michael Chertoff.
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/11/kurts-latest-thoughts.html

Michael Chertoff Wikipedia excerpts-

Michael Chertoff was the second United States Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush and co-author of the USA PATRIOT Act. He also co-founded the Chertoff Group, a risk management and security consulting company, which employs several senior officials from his time as Secretary of Homeland Security as well as Michael Hayden, a former Director of the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency. Chertoff has been an advocate of full body scanners at airports. In 2010 it emerged that Rapiscan Systems, a manufacturer of this technology, was a client of his security consulting firm, the Chertoff Group. He has come under a lot of pressure from fellow republicans for alleged corruption in that he was profiting from the sale of security equipment, which he advocated for, while Secretary of Homeland Security during the Bush presidency.

Group slams Chertoff on scanner promotion
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/01/02/group_slams_chertoff_on_scanner_promotion/

Some astute citizens, even without the Haskell and Chertoff information, are beginning to make connections like the following (posted by message board member pizzaman)-

Something occurred to me about these new TSA screening machines and pat-downs. If either the 'shoe-bomber' or the 'underwear-bomber', or both, had been successful we wouldn't have known how the bomb was smuggled on board. All the evidence would be pulverized. However, both of them 'failed' and we were able to catch them. Now we have all these new intrusive policies. Awfully convenient for the enemies.

Another thing, now that we are in the 21st century, aren't there better ways to stealthily ignite a bomb than a fuse you have to manually light with matches. They were both caught while trying to light their 'clothing bombs'. Seems to me, if you wanted to successfully blow up a plane, there are better ways to do it. If you want to affect screening policy, you set up a couple of 'failed' bombings.

In other words, I think both of those 'failed' bombings were set-ups to be caught.

The story of the Haskell's may be lost and obscured - but it's not going away. That is - until the DHS completes its shutdown of the internet or Congress beats them to it. See the story "Congress Back To Censoring Internet" and sign the petition while you still can.

Career Crippling Glenn Beck Scandal - Soon to Break?

2010-11-25T17:22:00.001-06:00

Alex Jones claims to have inside information indicating an upcoming coordinated character attack on fellow conservative commentator Glenn Beck – time frame within the next two months.

Referring to his source as “a very high-powered reporter… as big as it gets”, Jones said – “there is going to be a huge group of information breaking and Glenn Beck already knows about it. He doesn’t know the full extent though”. Jones refuses to reveal the name of his source. However, previously on his radio show, he has referred to his contacts as high-ranking individuals within the Fox News organization.

“I have a lot of moles and feelers… Glenn Beck has big torpedoes coming his way.”

Anti-conspiracy activists have long-revered Alex Jones for his relentless coverage of big-picture conspiracy issues. Outside of this group, Jones is becoming notorious for his tendency ahead of the curve – reporting on significant issues months and years before the main stream media. Most of Jones’s topics are rarely covered by the MSM. When they are covered typically they appear as hit pieces - attempts to discredit Jones’s factual sources and/or character. As Beck increases his coverage of big-picture conspiracy issues, Jones is predicting a similar modus operandi will be used against Beck.

“It really shook me up what I learned is going on. I really feel sick. He’s really going to find out just how ruthless these people are. This could be totally manufactured – what they are about to do to him. It’s going to be crippling at the bare minimum.”

Jones did not reveal the nature of the rumored scandal – only the seriousness of the repercussions and motive for the coming attack.

“I don’t know if it is true or not. If it is true – the system knew he had problems from the beginning… Things that are even worst than we know – the drugs and the rest of it. And, so they built him up as the figurehead of this movement to then try and discredit it. I don’t think that’s going to work… I hope this stuff isn’t true… But he better get ready.”

Because he is now talking about real issues - issues like poison in the water, eugenics, real puppet masters (not just George Soros), David Rockefeller and how robber barons are not free market and want socialism - I think he realizes that his time may be limited.

I don’t think it should be about personal things that the messenger is involved in. It should be about the info. The system wants to change the debate and instead of making it about the message, they want it to be about the messenger.”

As Beck gets closer to the truth, there will be real attempts to silence him.

If Beck knows what’s coming, and he knows the truth – why not go for broke and expose as much as he can to his national audience? He’s done a great job exposing George Soros – but it appears, there are others still higher on the food chain. Total exposure of the actual world power structure is required for the patriot movement to have a lasting success.

Perhaps that is what Jones is trying to get Beck to do by discussing this now – to prod him to go for broke with his large audience - while he still can.

Audio of the discussion involving Beck is part of the Joel Skousen interview linked HERE.

Michael Savage explains, but Rocky Balboa does it better.

2010-11-21T08:15:00.002-06:00

Michael Savage does the best job possible to explain the true nature what we are facing - but Rocky Balboa has a better message.

The following YouTube video features Michael Savage explaining Pan Leninism - The global expansion of Leninism. It's guaranteed that 80% of the people who choose to watch this video will have no idea what Michael is saying. In my opinion, this is the greatest threat facing America - far too many people don't understand what we are up against. Communism can be an overly-difficult subject to understand, especially when attempting to tackle the intellectual nuances of Socialism, Trotskyism, Leninism, the Bourgeoisie, and the dictatorship of the proletariat. By the time everyone understands all of this for the sham it is - it's too late and the population is in chains. This is the beauty of the Perestroika Deception in it's evil glory. When Communism faked it's own death - America went to sleep. This slumber has allowed infiltrators to spread like metastatic cancer to infect every aspect of our greatest free society.

The message was much simpler when Rocky Balboa fought Ivan Drago in Rocky IV and the Wolverines took to the mountains in the original Red Dawn. The message was, is, and should always be this simple - Communism is oppression. Oppression is slavery. Communism, Socialism, oppression and slavery are evil bedfellows. America stands for freedom. Freedom is opposed to slavery. America (through the constitution and the rule of constitutional law) stands against evil.

Much has changed in America since the days of Rocky IV and Red Dawn. We've gone from Drago to Soetoro in one generation. Yet one thing remains the same - real Americans stand against communism, socialism, oppression and slavery. This is true no matter what the President is or what the President believes.

Doctor Michael Savage is a great historian, speaker, writer, patriot and teacher. We desperately need high level people like Michael to deal with the "intellectual elites" and their attempts to argue around the true nature of communist oppression through perpetual rebranding and repackaging. Yet, we who remain on the right side of the info-war must also remember to keep it simple. Rocky Balboa didn't need to explain Pan Leninism to convince the masses of the evil threat of Communism. All the fictional fighter had to do was witness, find his heart and step into the ring - and the real story played to the masses.

Congress Back To Censoring Internet

2010-11-18T18:13:00.002-06:00

Brett Trout - patent attorney BlawgIT

Congress Back to Business as Usual
Now that the elections are over, Congress can get back to the job of censoring the internet. The kerfuffle over the TSA taking naked pictures of you and/or giving you a groin pat-down has to come as a welcome voter distraction for those lawmakers bent on ramming S. 3804: Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) through Congress before voters even know what it is. Simply put, the COICA allows the government to keep “blacklists” of websites the government, in its sole discretion, decides are “dedicated to infringing activities.” The COICA does not require any hearing or judicial review, just “BAM” your website is gone. Not just the allegedly infringing material, not just the webpage upon which it appears, your entire website.

Enlisting Your ISP Against You
But won’t your Internet Service Provider (ISP) stand up for you and your rights? Theoretically, but the COICA offers your ISP legal immunity if your ISP works with the government to shut down your website. You know your ISP better than I do, but given the choice between fighting the government to defend your rights or throwing you and your website under a bus, I have to imagine you stand a fairly good chance of winding up on the short end of that deal.

But What About the Safeguards?
There are no safeguards. The COICA diminishes the Department of Justice and the Attorney General to “Jack-Booted Thugs” doing the dirty work and stifling freedom of speech on behalf of huge corporate copyright interests. As noted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) “[w]ithout safeguards and a thorough accounting of the consequences, laws and policies targeting so-called ‘pirates’ can be used to pry away human rights and undermine fundamental elements of democracy and freedom.”

Read the rest of the story and sign the petition to stop this bill at Brett Trout's BlawgIT

Expletive Spewing Robots Expose Federal Reserve

2010-11-18T05:46:00.002-06:00

Is Anyone Minding the Store at the Federal Reserve?

According to Wikipedia - Elizabeth A. Coleman is the Inspector General for the Federal Reserve System. She was appointed in May 6, 2007. As Inspector General she leads the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The responsibilities of the OIG also include the prevention and detection of waste, fraud, and abuse at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The OIG is supposed to achieve its mandate through audits, evaluations, investigations, legislative reviews, while keeping the Chairman of the Board and Congress fully informed.

Not to disappoint - expletive-spewing robots are featured in the video below.

The Federal Reserve is Laundering Money

Quantitative Easing Explained

If you really want to learn the truth about the Federal Reserve - watch AMERICA: Freedom to Fascism. The entire Aaron Russo feature film is embedded below.

Moscow Building 5000 Bomb Shelters for Forced Relocation?

2010-11-17T05:53:00.000-06:00

The U.K. Telegraph is reporting that Russia is planning "the biggest population relocation since Stalin" - an effort to concentrate the majority of Russia's 141 million-strong population into 20 Megacities... Analysts said the plan, "would roll back the Soviet idea of urbanising the entire country."

Wikipedia maintains a historical timeline of population transfer in the Soviet Union which indicates the last relocation occurred in 1951.

Moscow Building 5000 Bomb Shelters By 2012

According to the RT.com video report featured at Windows to Russia - "currently in Moscow there are only shelters to house approx. half the current population". I speculate this is by design - with a shelter for half the population being the approximate formula. As central planners prepare for the upcoming relocation, logic would dictate an increase in the number of shelters in order to maintain the ratio of one shelter for every other person in the city. Perhaps this is the reason for the 5000 new shelters in Moscow?

Photo source: Wikimedia Commons