Media Hypes New WikiLeaks Front Man - John Young

On the same day as Julian Assange's arrest (December 7, 2010) an article ran in The New York Observer - seemingly on cue. The article, titled The Original WikiLeaker, introduced a new and "more credible" front man for the leaking community. Exit Assange, stage left - enter cryptome.org founder John Young, “the original Wikileaker.” For those of us who suspect that the entire WikiLeaks situation is orchestrated - the timing is impeccable.

One reason John Young appears more credible than Assange is his background, another is his demeanor. Wikipedia says of John Young -

In 2007 John Young, operator of cryptome, left his position on the WikiLeaks Board of Directors accusing the group of being a "CIA conduit." Young subsequently retreated from his assertion but has continued to be critical of the site. In a 2010 interview with CNET.com Young accused the group of a lack of transparency regarding their fundraising and financial management. He went on to state his belief that WikiLeaks could not guarantee whistleblowers the anonymity or confidentiality they claimed and that he "would not trust them with information if it had any value, or if it put me at risk or anyone that I cared about at risk."

Now, still in the same week of Assanges's exit, John Young has also appeared on The Alex Jones Show. Critical question - Is this, a legitimate interview or an attempt to build "street cred" within Jones's audience - an audience well known for its skepticism? Keep this in mind - if Young can successfully break into the alternative media cult with his message - it will resonate.


Young's message appears as the following in the Alex Jones appearance -

1) The leaking community cannot be stopped (without shutting down the internet).
2) The information leaked is credible. For example, in the Alex Jones interview, Young described attempts by the leaking community to "authenticate" the Bank of America hard drive before its release.
3) The leaking community at its core means well.
4) The leaking community, although created by the intelligence services, has, for the most part, turned on its master - gone rouge. "The people that are actually running it, that they hired to run it, are now reversing the panopticon."
5) WikiLeaks is a business (set up for profit - not for public benefit - "money is pouring in from both sides") but the leaking community itself is larger than WikiLeaks. (Young seems to be creating separation between the leaking community and WikiLeaks which will serve well in the continuance of leaks from other sources if/when WikiLeaks is shut down.)
6) The leaking community is extremely intelligent - more intelligent than the governments or organizations that fund them.
7) The leaking community is not truly independent.  It is not a government agency, and it is not a combine - "it is none of those. The intent was to have nothing that could be attacked easily. So it is not an organization, it is not an entity. It's a concept, it's an asperation. It's a goal. It is not anything you are going to be able to take down by the usual means... WikiLeaks will not be taken down. It will pop up some other way".

Young's points, when viewed as a whole, appear intent on bolstering trust in the leaking community. Each of these points additionally should be viewed in John Young's own words -

We'll it is what I was told as a kid. Trust no one but yourself and warn people not to trust you. We say at cryptome, do not trust us. Through our ignorance we may deceive you or betray you. Do not trust anyone who speaks with a voice of authority and do not trust anyone who sells you protection. Do not trust anyone who sells you trust. Because their own ignorance and venality will betray you... We've got a lot of talk from people who are well known liars. And most hackers are liars because that is how they social engineer. Most people on the internet lie. I lie. Are you hearing me? I lie. I'm lying to you right now. Keep that in mind. Everyone's got their agenda...

The show must go on. Also, in the Alex Jones appearance, John Young introduced a new cast of characters (the leaking community) and offered a lineup of coming episodes - both of which were published in the accompanying INFOWARS.com article.

Wikileaks Founder: Bigger Bombshells On The Way
http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-founder-bigger-bombshells-on-the-way/

According to Young, the new characters are listed on Wikipedia as "Cypherpunks". And, the coming episodes (roster of new releases "leaks" forthcoming) are as follows.

- Information about the internal affairs of Bank of America
- Files on weapons of mass destruction
- War plans of all nations, for and against one another
- Reports and training literature on black site prisons and torture chambers
- Files about clandestine spy agencies and their operatives
- Files on human rights abuses
- Files about billionaire political meddlers
- Files about global tax collection agencies
- Files about the Vatican’s meddling in global political affairs
- Information about the Clinton Foundation, although this was the only one on which Young wasn’t certain.

One thing is for certain - the media theater shall continue.

The Secret Behind Ted Turner’s Call For A Global One Child Policy

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com

Just months after a leaked UN blueprint that revealed climate change alarmists would start pushing “overpopulation” fears in favor of the discredited mantra of global warming as a means of dismantling the middle class, billionaire globalist Ted Turner followed suit during a Cancun luncheon yesterday when he urged the world to adopt China’s brutal one-child policy, and even suggested poor people should be sterilized in return for government handouts.

Following a speech by economist Brian O’Neill from the U.S.’s National Center for Atmospheric Research which “concluded that a rapidly rising global population is contributing to an acceleration of emission growth,” Uncle Ted stepped in to remind us that mere slaves should not aspire to follow his example of having five children, restricting themselves to one or being made to face the wrath of a Chinese-style one child policy, which sends women who defy its edicts to “re-education camps,” once they have been beaten, forcibly injected and had their baby boiled alive inside their womb of course.

“Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control – said the environmental stress on the Earth requires radical solutions, suggesting countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce,” reports the Globe and Mail.

The secret behind Turner’s call for western nations to enforce a tyrannical policy that in China is administered by undercover police and “family planning” authorities who kidnap, force drug and then forcibly abort babies of pregnant women, has nothing whatsoever to do with his concern for the environment.

Turner himself has five children and owns no less than 2 million acres of land. He is the largest private landowner on the planet, falling short of only the royal families of Europe. Turner has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%, a figure only achievable by outright genocide, mass abortion and infanticide.

In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population reduction, namely through United Nations programs, leading the way for the likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates’ father has long been a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist). Gates himself has given speeches in which he promotes the use of vaccines and abortion as a means of reducing global population and lowering CO2 emissions.

Quite how an improvement in health care through vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates was referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial “planetary regime” to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

This is what Gates and Turner discussed when they met in secret with the likes of George Soros and David Rockefeller at a private gathering of billionaires in Manhattan last year, a confab focused around how these globalists could use their wealth to “slow the growth of the world’s population.”

As is manifestly provable, the true agenda behind fanning the flames of fears about overpopulation is to reduce living standards globally, by preventing the third world from ever becoming economically prosperous, while also eviscerating the middle classes of western nations. It has nothing whatsoever to do with saving the earth and is merely another convenient trojan horse that globalists invoke to advance their tyranny.

This fact was admitted in a leaked UN blueprint which emerged in September. The document called for alarmists to push “overpopulation” as a replacement for “climate change,” while conceding that the ultimate goal was to “limit and redirect the aspirations for a better life of rising middle classes around the world,” in other words, to convince the masses that they will have to be content with a state of near poverty in order to save the planet from armageddon. Although Uncle Ted will get to keep his 2 million acres and his five kids will go on to procreate ad infinitum, naturally.

Overpopulation is a myth. The UN’s own figures clearly indicate that population is set to stabilize in 2020 and then drop dramatically after 2050. As the Economist reported, “Fertility is falling and families are shrinking in places— such as Brazil, Indonesia, and even parts of India—that people think of as teeming with children. As our briefing shows, the fertility rate of half the world is now 2.1 or less—the magic number that is consistent with a stable population and is usually called “the replacement rate of fertility”. Sometime between 2020 and 2050 the world’s fertility rate will fall below the global replacement rate.”

To emphasize, not only do the numbers clearly indicate that overpopulation is a contrived scare, but the scaremongers themselves have been caught admitting that they are fanning the fears in order to reduce living standards in the west and consequently set in motion a “global redistribution of wealth.”

And don’t for a second be fooled into thinking that this so-called “global redistribution of wealth” will manifest some kind of socialist utopia. As was uncovered during the Copenhagen summit, the program of “global redistribution of wealth” largely centers around looting the wealth of the middle classes in richer countries through carbon taxes and then using that money to bankroll the construction of world government. As the leaked “Danish text” revealed, the money generated from consumption taxes will go directly to the World Bank, not to developing countries.

Let me emphasize again, even if you believe the claptrap circulated about overpopulation, the men being empowered to “solve the problem” have stated that their primary goal is to kill 95 per cent of humanity while destroying prosperity and economic freedom in the west, as well as ensuring that the third world remains in mountains of debt to the World Bank and IMF.

This is akin to hiring Ted Bundy to spearhead a program aimed at alleviating an epidemic of physical abuse towards women. It would be like appointing Charlie Manson the leader of a teen summer camp.

Ted Turner is a billionaire industrialist with five kids, 2 million acres of land and a network of business interests that combined must spew more carbon dioxide in a year than all the people reading this article put together in a lifetime could manage. And he is telling you to make sacrifices, to not have children, to sell your reproductive rights and be sterilized, to reduce yourliving standards, just like Al Gores flaps his gums about rising sea levels caused by global warming while purchasing oceanside property worth millions of dollars.

How much more evidence will it take for people to accept the fact that overpopulation is a myth and that it has been hijacked by global warming alarmists who are now using it as a replacement for the discredited science of man-made climate change in order to build their new world order, which is based entirely around squeezing the middle class and making people more dependent on big government, thereby becoming the architects of their own enslavement and being forced to crawl cap-in-hand to the likes of Uncle Ted and beg for a dime.

When Good Men Do Nothing

By Wayne Greeson

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

So much of the history of the struggle between good and evil can be explained by Edmund Burke's observation. Time and again those who profess to be good seem to clearly outnumber those who are evil, yet those who are evil seem to prevail far too often. Seldom is it the numbers that determine the outcome, but whether those who claim to be good men are willing to stand up and fight for what they know to be right. There are numerous examples of this sad and awful scenario being played out over and over again in the scriptures.

They Get Nothing Good Done

When good men do nothing, they get nothing good done. To be good, one must do good. The Lord commands his people to do good (Luke 6:35; Eph. 2:10). Christ "gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works" (Titus 2:14).

In the parable of the talents, Jesus described a man who did nothing. When he received his Lord's money, he "went and digged in the earth, and hid his Lord's money" (Matt. 25:18). When his Lord returned, he returned to the Lord just what he had been given (Matt. 25:25). Notice, the servant did not do any outright evil, such as stealing the money, but then neither did he do anything good. He did nothing and he got nothing good accomplished. Jesus said he was a "wicked and slothful servant" (Matt. 25:26).

Jesus rebuked the church at Laodicea for doing nothing. "I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked" (Rev. 3:15-17).

Too many Christians and too many churches do nothing. They are standing idly by, they are mere spectators. They sit on the sidelines instead of actively participating and working for the good. If good wins, they join in the celebration though they did nothing to produce the victory. If evil wins, they will complain long and loud though their own apathy helped produce the undesirable result.

When Jesus found a fig tree with "nothing thereon, but leaves only" He cursed the tree and "presently the fig tree withered away" (Matt. 21:19). What will He do with those who claim to be good and yet who do nothing? John the baptist warned, "And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matt. 3:10; John 15:2).

They Help Evil To Triumph

When good men do nothing, evil triumphs. Evil, sin and sinful men must be opposed. God commands those who are good, not just to avoid evil but actively oppose it.

Christians are to not only to "have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but (also) reprove them" (Eph. 5:11). Those who do nothing about sin and evil, help the sin and evil to prevail. One who is silent when there are those around him in sin becomes a partaker with them (Eph. 5:7).

In the days of Elijah, the silence of many had allowed the evil of Ahab and Jezebel to prevail throughout the land of Israel. "And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? If the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word" (1 Kings 18:21). The silence of the people spoke volumes of their indecisiveness and inaction. Their failure to stand up, speak up and speak out permitted wicked and evil men to run rampant.

Jesus told of a traveler who was robbed, beaten and left him half dead. The men who did this were wicked and did a very wicked thing. But the Levite and priest allowed this evil to continue unanswered by doing nothing as they each "passed by on the other side" (Luke 10:31-32). Fortunately for the traveler there was one man, a Samaritan, who was willing to stand up for what was right (Luke 10:33-36).

Jesus warned "He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad" (Matt. 12:30). In the fight against evil there is no middle ground, no gray area, no neutrality. Those who are not actively and vigorously fighting against evil are helping evil to triumph.

They Are No Longer Good

When good men do nothing, they are no longer good. Many have the mistaken notion that good is merely the absence of doing that which is wrong. Not so! One is good not merely because he does no evil, but because he is actively working for what is good. "Let him eschew evil, and do good" (1 Pet. 3:11). James explained, "Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin" (James 4:17).

The eldest of Israel, Reuben, knew his brothers' murderous plot against their younger brother Joseph was wrong. He started an attempt to deliver Joseph, but as he hesitated and vacillated, the other brothers sold Joseph into slavery. When Reuben heard what they had done, he realized his failure to act had helped to bring about this evil result.

Instead of correcting his error, Reuben sought to cover his guilt by agreeing with his brothers to lie to their father about Joseph's disappearance (Gen. 37:18-35). Reuben had "good intentions" and he was not even present when Joseph was sold into slavery, but he knew his inaction and absence made him just as guilty as the rest of his wicked brothers. This guilt continued to haunt him through the years (Gen. 42:21-22).

The prophet Obadiah severely condemned the Edomites for doing nothing when evil was befalling their brethren, the Jews. When Jerusalem was invaded by her enemies, the Edomites "stood on the other side" doing nothing but watching the slaughter as spectators. God said by their failure to act and to help their brethren "even thou wast as one of them" (Obad. 11).

Today, there are preachers and Christians who fail and refuse to meet the real foe, refute error and fight the enemy. Instead, they have turned to viciously savaging their own brethren. They are filled with bitterness and hatred and they maliciously attack, slander and misrepresent other Christians and gospel preachers.

Paul warned about such men and behavior among those professing to be Christians, "But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another" (Gal. 5:15). Those who engage in such behavior are spiritual cannibals.

While the conduct of these so-called Christians is shameful, what about those supposedly "good" men who do nothing? Those stand on the other side and do nothing but watch as their brothers are being slandered, slaughtered and devoured, they cease being innocent bystanders and idle spectators. Their failure to act not only allows evil to triumph, but makes them just as guilty as the spiritual cannibals they refuse to reprove and rebuke. In God's words, "even thou wast as one of them" (Obad. 11).

Conclusion

"Be not deceived; God is not mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap" (Gal. 6:7). Those who fail or refuse to do good in the face of evil are sowing some dangerous seeds. They are doing nothing good as Jesus commanded them to do; they are helping evil to win and have ceased being good and have become partakers of the evil they did nothing to stop.

Do not allow evil to triumph. Do not sit by and do nothing. Stand up and be counted, speak up against evil and speak out against evil men and their sinful deeds.

Source : http://www.padfield.com/1997/goodmen.html
The Church of Christ in Zion, Illinois
David Padfield - Evangelist
www.padfield.com

The WikiLeaks Trap - Don't fall for it!

A Kish Collections special report - by J.N. Kish

On the heels of “cablegate”, the WikiLeaks organization is coming into clear focus.  WikiLeaks is part of an elaborate information / disinformation campaign – a PSYOP.  The so-called “information” from WikiLeaks is not to be trusted.

Psychological warfare - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psy-ops

Various techniques are used, by any set of groups, and aimed to influence a target audience's value systems, belief systems, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originator's objectives, and is sometimes combined with black operations or false flag tactics. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.

The U.S. Department of Defense defines psychological warfare as: "The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives."

PSYOPS, like physical weapons, can be good – when used for legitimate defense against “hostile foreign groups”.  But when “achievement of national objectives” runs contrary to the will of the American people – well, we have a problem.

In the case of WikiLeaks – one of the related “national objectives” appears to be government seizure of the Internet. 

Congress Back To Censoring Internet
http://blawgit.com/2010/11/17/congress-back-to-censoring-internet/comment-page-1/

Homeland Security Is Seizing Internet Domains Left And Right
http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wordpress/2010/11/homeland-security-is-seizing-internet-domains-left-and-right/

Web Censorship Bill Sails Through Senate Committee
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/11/coica-web-censorship-bill/

Google and YouTube Censor News - Ban Alex Jones
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/286/623/Google_and_YouTube_Censor_News_-_Ban_Alex_Jones.html

Communist / Fascist factions within our government are seeking public support in favor of an Internet crackdown.  And now, with its “extremely dangerous” release of “leaked” United States embassy cables, Wikileaks is poised as an example - an example of a site that deserves to be shut down.  The Wikileaks situation is part of a larger plan.  It is likely these cables were intentionally leaked as a means to the end.

Citizen suspicions are mounting.

With the Internet in its current state, citizens are able quickly to share information and ideas. This sharing allows us to work together and figure out this kind of thing – a campaign like WikiLeaks. This is exactly the kind of freedom that the establishment is set to quell.  The establishment is rapidly losing control of the media, and they desperately want it back.  We now find ourselves in the throws of an all out “info war”.  It’s a war for control of the Internet – waged between the representative republic (citizens), and would-be federal controllers.  People are beginning to wake up to this reality.

WikiLeaks: A “staged” crime scene
http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/4304

One astute message board commenter wrote-

I think these factions are using Soviet style self-infliction tactics. Even John Bolton thinks something is fake about it, at least regarding the diplomat cables. On another note, it looks like a major bank is up next on the smear list. I'm assuming it'll be Wells Fargo since it's a politically right-leaning institution and it fought hard against being forced to take a bailout. It's a gut feeling but it could also be Citi or BoA. We'll see though.

It's much bigger than Julian Assange.

The second link in the message board comment is a Forbes article by Andy Greenberg that opens with this paragraph -

Admire him or revile him, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange is the prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency, the leader of an organization devoted to divulging the world’s secrets using technology unimagined a generation ago. Over the last year his information insurgency has dumped 76,000 secret Afghan war documents and another trove of 392,000 files from the Iraq war into the public domain–the largest classified military security breaches in history. Sunday, WikiLeaks made the first of 250,000 classified U.S. State Department cables public, offering an unprecedented view of how America’s top diplomats view enemies and friends alike.

"Prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency"? Assange is a guy with a web site. The real story here should be about the data - and who is helping Assange - not Assange himself. Without the data and the hosting servers - Assange and WikiLeaks would not be a story at all. Someone has to feed the data, and someone has to run the servers for WikiLeaks to exist. But here is the thing that really doesn't add up - Where does this guy earn his money? It can cost a lot of money to keep a high traffic server up and running. Who is paying for his hosting costs?

The following article sheds some light-
WikiLeaks host linked to Pirate Bay
http://www.3news.co.nz/WikiLeaks-host-link...rticleID=169480
Key excerpts –

A Swedish internet company linked to file-sharing hub The Pirate Bay says it's helping online whistle-blower WikiLeaks release classified documents from servers located in a Stockholm suburb.

Mikael Viborg, the owner of the web hosting company PRQ, on Friday showed The Associated Press the site - the basement of a drab office building - in Solna on the condition that the exact location was not revealed.

The secretive website gives few details about its setup, but says its "servers are distributed over multiple international jurisdictions and do not keep logs. Hence these logs cannot be seized."

Viborg said WikiLeaks has servers outside Sweden, too.

"There are backups," he said. "If one goes down, there are others that take over."

Viborg said he was comfortable revealing the location in Solna because Swedish authorities already know where it is and have not tried to shut down the servers.

"Not so far," Viborg said... when you look at the legal situation it's hard to see that Swedish authorities can tell us to do anything, legally.

"They can ask us to do it out of goodwill, but I can tell you right now that we won't oblige."

Swedish Foreign Ministry spokesman Anders Jorle said the government had not been contacted by the United States about the WikiLeaks servers and had no plans to get involved in the matter. Any decision to intervene would have to be taken by Sweden's justice system, he said.

Sweden's staunch protection of the freedom of expression has made it a sanctuary for websites carrying politically sensitive information.

WikiLeaks recently posted a huge encrypted file named "Insurance" to its website, sparking speculation that those behind the organization may be prepared to release more classified information if authorities interfere with them.

He said PRQ had worked with WikiLeaks since 2008, but always through a Swedish middleman instead of direct contacts. PRQ doesn't own the WikiLeaks servers in Solna, but provides the Internet service, electricity and other services, including restarting the servers when needed, he added.

There is also this report that suggests “WikiLeaks site is being hosted on Amazon's ‘hack-proof’ servers right here in Washington”.  This was later followed up by mainstream media reports from The Associated Press, CBS and ABC “that Amazon's servers had stopped hosting WikiLeaks”.

Assange is not working alone - he has help and is certainly not a "prophet".

However, fueled by the mainstream media (controlled hype), Assange and WikiLeaks are certainly being built up as much more than they really are. Why?

Who benefits from WikiLeaks?

Who is set up to benefit as this information / disinformation campaign progresses?  The answer to this question will lead to a real understanding of the WikiLeaks situation.

In order to determine the answer, let’s begin with the opposite.  Who doesn’t benefit?  This one is easy – the common citizen.  I can't think of a single thing that WikiLeaks has done to benefit me personally - can you?
However, it is possible to recall several things that have come about pursuant to WikiLeaks that have harmed the common man – from the beginning.  WikiLeaks first major release "The Iraq War Logs" – included edited military footage of a helicopter assault in Iraq and was launched with a great amount of hype on the AP news wire.

The edited footage was highly deceptive and was apparently set up to foster Anti-American sentiment around the world (itself an initial deception for WikiLeaks to gain credibility in the global arena). The Scholars Stage said of the incident at the time - 

WikiLeaks edited and presented this incident in a manner that can be called nothing but blatantly dishonest.

The blatant dishonesty harmed the morale of the common man – especially those serving in the U.S. military.  This harm is documented in the Kish Collections article – A Tale of Three Videos.

Amazingly, the rebroadcast of this WikiLeaks video has also been cited as the reason cited for the Alex Jones You Tube ban.

Google and YouTube Censor News - Ban Alex Jones
http://jnkish.blogspot.com/2010/11/google-and-youtube-censor-news-ban-alex.html

This ban is on course to restrict dissemination of information from the alternative news media – censorship.  This restriction of freedom is again - harm to the common man. Each release of WikiLeaks “information” tends to lead to more establishment media control – and thus serves to answer the general question as to who benefits.

The Key Message -

No benefit = No value = Distraction

Don't waste your time on the WikiLeaks “information”.  The WikiLeaks PSYOP campaign is part of the larger plan to seize control of free speech on the Internet and in the media. It’s part of the global war on free speech.  It's a trap!

Please - focus instead on exposing the real people behind the WikiLeaks organization. 

Parting notes and thoughts –

Wayne Madsen was interviewed on the 11/30/2010 Alex Jones Show – he suggested the possibility of a WikiLeaks connection to George Soros.

The WikiLeaks information is now being presented as true by the mainstream media even without a verifiable source – this is the real danger.

WikiLeaks - WikiPedia Link

The creators of WikiLeaks have not been formally identified.
How to leak a secret and not get caught
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19325865.500-how-to-leak-a-secret-and-not-get-caught.html

Why does WikiLeaks need a board of directors? Who serves (has served) on WikiLeaks board of directors?  How much does it pay to serve on the board of WikiLeaks?

Who is funding WikiLeaks?  Follow the money.

Google and YouTube Censor News - Ban Alex Jones

Google's Motto - Don't Be Evil? Apparently, a struggle is ongoing within the Google organization as the company has chosen repeatedly to block news and information originating from Alex Jones and his web sites.

Infowars.com

Both Google and its subsidiary company You Tube have banned Alex Jones and his websites, as attempts to curtail free speech widen.

Within the past 2-3 weeks, Jones and his team have confirmed that after years of being listed under Google News, one of the largest platforms for news dissemination, that PrisonPlanet.com and Infowars.com have been blocked from its search results, effectively censoring their content from wide web coverage. Only smaller sites that re-post the content have appeared in Google searches since early November.



In a separate matter, TheAlexJonesChannel on YouTube has learned that it will be either frozen or blocked from uploading new content for several weeks following a “Community Guidelines” violation decision. According to YouTube’s support team, users from its site flagged a video on the channel that contained controversial video of the Apache helicopter “collateral murder” that occurred in Iraq in 2007 and was released by Wikileaks. When TheAlexJonesChannel attempted to challenge the removal of this video via YouTube’s counter-notification form, it was subsequently told that the account would be disabled and new content blocked (apparently due to the challenge, as no other strikes exist on the account).

The graphic content in the video– which documents real events the Pentagon never wanted released– has been posted by hundreds of other channels on YouTube, including major media outlets like CBS News and Russia Today without being flagged or removed, yet TheAlexJonesChannel has been told that its posting of a smaller portion of this incident is offensive or otherwise against its community guidelines. This appears to be double standard as even the age-verification barrier set-up for some of the postings was not offered for TheAlexJonesChannel version; it was simple deleted by user demand and YouTube mandate.
It is evident that the system revels in any chance to dampen the loud voice that Alex Jones, Infowars.com/PrisonPlanet.com and its supporters have raised on the Internet, effectively challenging the status quo and mainstream media spin on major news and events. With the easy passage of the web censorship bill, it is further clear that what is happening now to Infowars.com and Alex Jones will soon happen to anyone without a politically-correct message, particularly when that message is capable of resonating throughout large parts of the globe.

It is up to supporters and lovers of freedom to challenge censorship and oppression on the web, because only resistance can slow the attempts to curtail free speech and expression online. As Frederick Douglass said, “Find out just what the people will submit to and you’ve found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” This will be prove to be more true than ever in the age of the Internet.

If you are outraged or concerned about Internet Censorship - Visit the following article and sign the petition - Congress Back To Censoring Internet

God bless us all in our quest to resist evil.

Eyewitness Spoof Links Chertoff Body Scanners to Underwear Bomber Plot

Last Christmas, Attorney Kurt Haskell and his wife were returning from Amsterdam on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 bound for Detroit. Shortly before landing, a lunatic terrorist (seated a few rows in front of the Haskell's) decided to ignite a package of explosives which he had allegedly hidden in the crotch of his pants. A hero dubbed The Flying Dutchman hurled himself onto the would-be bomber and extinguished the fire with his bare hands. The lives of everyone on the plane were saved and The Department of Homeland Security claimed "the system worked". -- This is popular legend of The Underwear Bomber. A legend which, in less than a year, has heralded the roll out of radiating full naked body scanners, enhanced "groping" pat downs, and serious repercussions including fines and arrest for those who do not submit. This, in turn, has led to a widespread media frenzy and public backlash. The latest salvo in the saga appears to be a new TSA administrative directive calling for opt-outers to be considered "Domestic Extremists".

Within all of this appears to be lost - the amazing story of the Haskell's as documented in the following articles.

THE TRUTH ABOUT FLIGHT 253 HAS BEEN REVEALED - By Kurt Haskell
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-about-flight-253-has-been.html

Flight 253 passenger: Sharp-dressed man aided terror suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab onto plane without passport (MLive.com exclusive)
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_says_at_l.html

Latest Story - By Kurt Haskell
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/latest-story-by-kurt-haskell.html

Bombshell Eyewitness Revelations: Confirmed FBI Cover-Up Of Flight 253 Attack
http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-eyewitness-revelations-confirmed-fbi-cover-up-of-flight-253-attack/

The Sharp Dressed Man Who Aided Mutallab Onto Flight 253 Was U.S. Government Agent
http://www.infowars.com/the-sharp-dressed-man-who-aided-mutallab-onto-flight-253-was-u-s-government-agent/

And now - victim turned activist Kurt Haskell shares his research and views in a newly-released spoof video embedded below. As you watch, keep in mind that Haskell, his wife and the remainder of the 278 passengers and 11 crew would have been blown out of the sky if the bombing was successful. To say he is motivated to reveal the truth would be an understatement. Kurt Haskell appears to be on a mission to understand and expose the entire story of the ordeal.

Kurt's Spoof on the Underwear Bomber
Video Kurt created discussing the Underwear Bomber with Michael Chertoff.
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/11/kurts-latest-thoughts.html


Michael Chertoff Wikipedia excerpts-

Michael Chertoff was the second United States Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush and co-author of the USA PATRIOT Act. He also co-founded the Chertoff Group, a risk management and security consulting company, which employs several senior officials from his time as Secretary of Homeland Security as well as Michael Hayden, a former Director of the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency. Chertoff has been an advocate of full body scanners at airports. In 2010 it emerged that Rapiscan Systems, a manufacturer of this technology, was a client of his security consulting firm, the Chertoff Group. He has come under a lot of pressure from fellow republicans for alleged corruption in that he was profiting from the sale of security equipment, which he advocated for, while Secretary of Homeland Security during the Bush presidency.

Group slams Chertoff on scanner promotion
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/01/02/group_slams_chertoff_on_scanner_promotion/

Some astute citizens, even without the Haskell and Chertoff information, are beginning to make connections like the following (posted by message board member pizzaman)-

Something occurred to me about these new TSA screening machines and pat-downs. If either the 'shoe-bomber' or the 'underwear-bomber', or both, had been successful we wouldn't have known how the bomb was smuggled on board. All the evidence would be pulverized. However, both of them 'failed' and we were able to catch them. Now we have all these new intrusive policies. Awfully convenient for the enemies.

Another thing, now that we are in the 21st century, aren't there better ways to stealthily ignite a bomb than a fuse you have to manually light with matches. They were both caught while trying to light their 'clothing bombs'. Seems to me, if you wanted to successfully blow up a plane, there are better ways to do it. If you want to affect screening policy, you set up a couple of 'failed' bombings.

In other words, I think both of those 'failed' bombings were set-ups to be caught.

The story of the Haskell's may be lost and obscured - but it's not going away.  That is - until the DHS completes its shutdown of the internet or Congress beats them to it. See the story "Congress Back To Censoring Internet" and sign the petition while you still can.

Career Crippling Glenn Beck Scandal - Soon to Break?

Alex Jones claims to have inside information indicating an upcoming coordinated character attack on fellow conservative commentator Glenn Beck – time frame within the next two months.

Referring to his source as “a very high-powered reporter… as big as it gets”, Jones said – “there is going to be a huge group of information breaking and Glenn Beck already knows about it. He doesn’t know the full extent though”. Jones refuses to reveal the name of his source. However, previously on his radio show, he has referred to his contacts as high-ranking individuals within the Fox News organization.

“I have a lot of moles and feelers… Glenn Beck has big torpedoes coming his way.”

Anti-conspiracy activists have long-revered Alex Jones for his relentless coverage of big-picture conspiracy issues. Outside of this group, Jones is becoming notorious for his tendency ahead of the curve – reporting on significant issues months and years before the main stream media. Most of Jones’s topics are rarely covered by the MSM. When they are covered typically they appear as hit pieces - attempts to discredit Jones’s factual sources and/or character. As Beck increases his coverage of big-picture conspiracy issues, Jones is predicting a similar modus operandi will be used against Beck.

“It really shook me up what I learned is going on. I really feel sick. He’s really going to find out just how ruthless these people are. This could be totally manufactured – what they are about to do to him. It’s going to be crippling at the bare minimum.”

Jones did not reveal the nature of the rumored scandal – only the seriousness of the repercussions and motive for the coming attack.

“I don’t know if it is true or not. If it is true – the system knew he had problems from the beginning… Things that are even worst than we know – the drugs and the rest of it. And, so they built him up as the figurehead of this movement to then try and discredit it. I don’t think that’s going to work… I hope this stuff isn’t true… But he better get ready.”

Because he is now talking about real issues - issues like poison in the water, eugenics, real puppet masters (not just George Soros), David Rockefeller and how robber barons are not free market and want socialism - I think he realizes that his time may be limited.

I don’t think it should be about personal things that the messenger is involved in. It should be about the info. The system wants to change the debate and instead of making it about the message, they want it to be about the messenger.”

As Beck gets closer to the truth, there will be real attempts to silence him.

If Beck knows what’s coming, and he knows the truth – why not go for broke and expose as much as he can to his national audience? He’s done a great job exposing George Soros – but it appears, there are others still higher on the food chain. Total exposure of the actual world power structure is required for the patriot movement to have a lasting success.

Perhaps that is what Jones is trying to get Beck to do by discussing this now – to prod him to go for broke with his large audience - while he still can.

Audio of the discussion involving Beck is part of the Joel Skousen interview linked HERE.

Michael Savage explains, but Rocky Balboa does it better.

Michael Savage does the best job possible to explain the true nature what we are facing - but Rocky Balboa has a better message.

The following YouTube video features Michael Savage explaining Pan Leninism - The global expansion of Leninism. It's guaranteed that 80% of the people who choose to watch this video will have no idea what Michael is saying. In my opinion, this is the greatest threat facing America - far too many people don't understand what we are up against. Communism can be an overly-difficult subject to understand, especially when attempting to tackle the intellectual nuances of Socialism, Trotskyism, Leninism, the Bourgeoisie, and the dictatorship of the proletariat. By the time everyone understands all of this for the sham it is - it's too late and the population is in chains. This is the beauty of the Perestroika Deception in it's evil glory. When Communism faked it's own death - America went to sleep. This slumber has allowed infiltrators to spread like metastatic cancer to infect every aspect of our greatest free society.



The message was much simpler when Rocky Balboa fought Ivan Drago in Rocky IV and the Wolverines took to the mountains in the original Red Dawn. The message was, is, and should always be this simple - Communism is oppression. Oppression is slavery. Communism, Socialism, oppression and slavery are evil bedfellows. America stands for freedom. Freedom is opposed to slavery. America (through the constitution and the rule of constitutional law) stands against evil.

Much has changed in America since the days of Rocky IV and Red Dawn. We've gone from Drago to Soetoro in one generation. Yet one thing remains the same - real Americans stand against communism, socialism, oppression and slavery. This is true no matter what the President is or what the President believes.

Doctor Michael Savage is a great historian, speaker, writer, patriot and teacher. We desperately need high level people like Michael to deal with the "intellectual elites" and their attempts to argue around the true nature of communist oppression through perpetual rebranding and repackaging. Yet, we who remain on the right side of the info-war must also remember to keep it simple. Rocky Balboa didn't need to explain Pan Leninism to convince the masses of the evil threat of Communism. All the fictional fighter had to do was witness, find his heart and step into the ring - and the real story played to the masses.

Congress Back To Censoring Internet

Brett Trout - patent attorney BlawgIT

Congress Back to Business as Usual 
Now that the elections are over, Congress can get back to the job of censoring the internet. The kerfuffle over the TSA taking naked pictures of you and/or giving you a groin pat-down has to come as a welcome voter distraction for those lawmakers bent on ramming S. 3804: Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) through Congress before voters even know what it is. Simply put, the COICA allows the government to keep “blacklists” of websites the government, in its sole discretion, decides are “dedicated to infringing activities.” The COICA does not require any hearing or judicial review, just “BAM” your website is gone. Not just the allegedly infringing material, not just the webpage upon which it appears, your entire website.

Enlisting Your ISP Against You
But won’t your Internet Service Provider (ISP) stand up for you and your rights? Theoretically, but the COICA offers your ISP legal immunity if your ISP works with the government to shut down your website. You know your ISP better than I do, but given the choice between fighting the government to defend your rights or throwing you and your website under a bus, I have to imagine you stand a fairly good chance of winding up on the short end of that deal.

But What About the Safeguards?
There are no safeguards. The COICA diminishes the Department of Justice and the Attorney General to “Jack-Booted Thugs” doing the dirty work and stifling freedom of speech on behalf of huge corporate copyright interests. As noted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) “[w]ithout safeguards and a thorough accounting of the consequences, laws and policies targeting so-called ‘pirates’ can be used to pry away human rights and undermine fundamental elements of democracy and freedom.”

Read the rest of the story and sign the petition to stop this bill at Brett Trout's BlawgIT

Expletive Spewing Robots Expose Federal Reserve

Is Anyone Minding the Store at the Federal Reserve?

According to Wikipedia - Elizabeth A. Coleman is the Inspector General for the Federal Reserve System. She was appointed in May 6, 2007. As Inspector General she leads the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The responsibilities of the OIG also include the prevention and detection of waste, fraud, and abuse at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The OIG is supposed to achieve its mandate through audits, evaluations, investigations, legislative reviews, while keeping the Chairman of the Board and Congress fully informed.

Not to disappoint - expletive-spewing robots are featured in the video below.

The Federal Reserve is Laundering Money


Quantitative Easing Explained


If you really want to learn the truth about the Federal Reserve - watch AMERICA: Freedom to Fascism. The entire Aaron Russo feature film is embedded below.