Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Thomas L. Friedman Wants Us "to be China for a day," to "authorize the right solutions"

Reason Magazine
Matt Welch | May 24, 2010

If we know anything about America's worst successful columnist, it's that he won't rest until he's flogged a terrible idea again and again and again. The latest, care of Jonah Goldberg, was Friedman's authoritarian envy on Meet the Press over the weekend:
Well, David, it's been decimated. It's been decimated by everything from the gerrymandering of political districts to cable television to an Internet where I can create a digital lynch mob against you from the left or right if I don't like where you're going, to the fact that money and politics is so out of control—really our Congress is a forum for legalized bribery. You know, that's really what, what it's come down to. So I don't—I, I—I'm worried about this, it's why I have fantasized—don't get me wrong—but that what if we could just be China for a day? I mean, just, just, just one day. You know, I mean, where we could actually, you know, authorize the right solutions, and I do think there is a sense of that, on, on everything from the economy to environment. I don't want to be China for a second, OK, I want my democracy to work with the same authority, focus and stick-to-itiveness. But right now we have a system that can only produce suboptimal solutions.
If we're going to be China, I wonder which politically restive province Friedman would support removing Internet access privileges for 10 months?...

Read the rest of the article at  Reason Magazine.

My take- Friedman thinks that the best way to compete with China is to be like China. Friedman is lost and confused. He has yet to understand what is really going on in the world, or if he does understand, he is choosing to ignore the reality of our situation, or possibly, he is working for the other side.

The same can be said of Barry.

Who is Friedman's "we"?  What are their "solutions"?

What Friedman (and the like) does not understand is that he and his people don't have all the right answers.  The people have the answers for each of their own individual situations.  What the people need is proper representation in the federal government.  We need limits on the federal government as outlined in our constitution.  We need these limits to keep Friedman's "we" from authorizing the wrong solutions- like TARP, like Government Directed Health Care and wasted "Stimulus".

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Obama Calls for Global Government: “A New International Order”

InfoWars source Alpha Omega Report  May 23, 2010:

On Saturday, President Obama showed his true NWO colors even though he avoided the popular catch phrase “New WORLD Order” by replacing “world” with “International.” Both words are synonymous with each other.

During a speech at West Point, Obama pledged to assist in shaping a new “international order” to help secuire America’s safety and emphasized his faith in global institutions. He envisions the US taking a prominent role in shaping a new world with Democratic global values.

We may compare his speech to that of President George Herbert Walker Bush in 1990 and 1991 just before and again after what became known now as Gulf War 1. The elder President Bush spoke of “a thousand points of light” in reference to a “New World Order” and repeated that phrase during his clarion calls for global governance. Obama is signalling his pledge to the Illuminist cause and to his puppet masters as he orders steps taken to gear up the United States for a military clash in the Middle East.

Read the rest at InfoWars

IF - By Rudyard Kipling

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too:
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise;

If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim,
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same:.
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build'em up with worn-out tools;

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings,
And never breathe a word about your loss:
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!"

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much:
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Thai Cartoon - Don't mess with Chang!

Michael Yon is embedded in Bangkok-
From Michael Yon's Facebook- "A Thai sent this via email. Apparently this is being sent around. (Don't mess with Chang!)"
I agree with the following comment posted by TaiSuwanna (ฟิชล็อค รักในหลวง)- "True, Chang is big and can step all over someone like that. But not every "Kwan" is stupid like the one in this comic strip!"
Don't underestimate "communist revolutionaries".  They represent a serious, intelligent and determined enemy.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Bangkok Is Burning

Michael Yon is embedded in Bangkok-
From Michael Yon's Facebook 04:00CST -
Message from Irving Paul Knightly: "SET (Thai stock exchange on Ratchada) is now burning, and a campaign of arson now seems to be underway. Fires have been set at Siam Square shopping center."
Yon- "There are at least two substantial fires in Bangkok that I can see. I don't see the actual fires or what is burning but does not appear to be smoke only from tires. Something serious apparently is burning. A journalist just told me that 4 journalists have been shot today and one died. I do not know if this is true. He said we are being targeted. I do not know if this is true but it seems so."  Yon's background-  Wikipedia,  Wired Magazine

Update 5/19/2010 18:43CST Yon-
A friend in Thailand tried to get on my Facebook page and got this message:

Access to this information. Suspended temporarily
By virtue.
Emergency Decree on Public Administration.
In emergency situations, BE 2548.
By order of the Director of the Center Emergency Chen situation.A.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Peter Orszag, Bureaucrat - Our Future is in Good Hands

Peter Richard Orszag is currently the 37th Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Barack Obama, the largest office within the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP). Full Resume HERE.

Peter Orszag was the seventh director of the CBO serving from January 18, 2007 to November 25, 2008. The Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate jointly appoint the CBO Director. He was appointed to the position of CBO director by Democrat Nancy Pelosi and Republican Ted Stevens each in their second full week of holding appointing office.

Peter Orszag's Resume Highlights-
- Adviser, Central Bank of Iceland -- Before the Crash of 2008
- Adviser, Rahm Emanuel and Bill Clinton on the disastrous NAFTA bill that devastated U.S. manufacturing

• Staff Economist, Council of Economic Advisers, August 1993–July 1994. Areas of
concentration included international macroeconomics, international trade, and the reform
process in the former Soviet Union.
• Economic Adviser, Macroeconomic and Fiscal Unit (Ministry of Finance, Russian
Government), January 1993–August 1993. Assisted the Russian Government in its
negotiations with the International Monetary Fund.
• Research Officer, Centre for Economic Performance, September 1992–August 1993. Wrote
Russian Economic Trends, the quarterly report of the Russian Government.

The following excerpt is from Who Runs the Obama White House? by Christopher Bollyn-

WHO IS PETER ORSZAG?- One of the key players in the Obama administration's $900 billion economic stimulus package is Obama's new budget director Peter R. Orszag. The forty-year-old Orszag is the director of the Office of Management and Budget, the arm of the White House responsible for crafting the federal budget and overseeing the effectiveness of federal programs. He worked closely with Rahm Emanuel in the Clinton administration - when the disastrous NAFTA legislation was passed - and was one of the first Obama appointees to be approved.

"In the coming years, no bureaucrat will be as decisive as Peter Orszag," Ezra Klein wrote recently in The American Prospect. So, who is Peter Richard Orszag and what kind of decisions will he make with the budget he controls? Based on his background one would be well advised to prepare for a financial train wreck.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Polish Crash Yields Ultrasecret Satcom Codes

THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2010 - Bill Gertz INSIDE THE RING - NATO code compromise
The recent crash of a Polish military transport that killed most of Warsaw's senior civilian and military leaders was not only a human catastrophe for a key U.S. ally. NATO sources said that, in addition to the loss of nearly 100 pro-U.S. Polish leaders, the crash provided Moscow with a windfall of secrets.
The crash killed Polish President Lech Kaczynski in western Russia on April 10 and decapitated Poland's military, killing two service chiefs, key military aides and several national security officials, many of whom were carrying computers and pocket memory sticks that contained sensitive NATO data.
Perhaps the most significant compromise, according to a NATO intelligence source, is that the Russians are suspected of obtaining ultrasecret codes used by NATO militaries for secure satellite communications.
The compromise of the codes is considered what electronic spies call a "break" for Moscow code-breakers...
The coded communications, if decrypted, would reveal some of NATO's most intimate secrets, such as plans for defenses and even the identities of agents or allied eavesdropping sources.
Other Polish and NATO secrets also were believed to be aboard the jet, and so far Russia's government is refusing to cooperate fully with Poland's government in providing details on the cause of the crash, or even to turn over the Polish jet's black boxes.
Read the rest of the story HERE at the Washington Times.

Related Kish Collections Posts-
SUNDAY, APRIL 11, 2010 - Polish Missile Shield and Tragic Regime Change
SATURDAY, APRIL 10, 2010Polish Presidential Jet Crash - Unprecedented
Image credit - isafmedia

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Monday, May 10, 2010

EAST-ASIA-INTEL: China, Iran, North Korea have formed strategic alliance

Source-World Tribune 5/7/2010
TEL AVIV — China, Iran and North Korea have established a strategic alliance that focuses on missile and nuclear development, according to a new report.

The report said that Beijing, Pyongyang and Teheran were helping each other in missile and nuclear programs. The report, titled "China, Iran and North Korea: A Triangular Strategic Alliance," by Israel's GLORIA Center said China and North Korea were the key suppliers of Scud-based ballistic missiles to Iran's military, the target of Western sanctions.

"This flurry of activities underscored the growing proliferation threats posed by DPRK [North Korea] assistance to Iran's missile capabilities, which has also led to collaboration in the nuclear realm," the report, published in the Middle East Review of International Affairs, said.

The report said North Korea helped develop Iran's Shihab ballistic missiles series. Author Christina Lin said North Korea's Taepo Dong intermediate-range missiles have served as the basis of Iran's program, including the design of a nuclear interncontinental ballistic missile with a range of up to 6,000 kilometers, dubbed Shihab-6.

China has sought to make Iran a key waystation in Beijing's silk road policy of expanding influence throughout Asia. The report said Beijing, believed to be channeling aid through neighboring North Korea, regarded Iran as an ally to balance the strategic relationship between the United States and the Gulf Cooperation Council.

"Iran may also be a new pearl in China's maritime pearl necklace," the report said. "China is increasing its naval presence in the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean, with a call in December 2009 by Chinese Rear Adm. Yin Zhou to set up a permanent naval base in the Gulf of Aden."

For more, see: String of Pearls by Lt Col Christopher J. Pehrson

The report did not discount the prospect that China would establish a permanent naval base in Iran. Ms. Yin, today a researcher with Jane's Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Intelligence Center, said China could be offered a naval base at one of Iran's islands in the Gulf.

"Iran may be inclined to offset U.S. pressure by playing the 'China card' should the United States try to project military power by utilizing some of the UAE's man-made islands," the report said. "Indeed, in November 2009, NATO entered into the advanced stages of negotiating a Status of Forces Agreement with the United Arab Emirates in the face of Iran's nuclear threat."

The report said China was expected to block United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran. Ms. Lin compared China's role to that of Russia's alliance with Serbia when it came under attack by a Western-led coalition in 1999.

Regardless of UN sanctions, North Korea would continue to funnel weapons and technology to Iran, the report said. Ms. Lin said Iran has financed North Korean research and development of ballistic missiles and other strategic systems.

"Iran and DPRK have partnered closely on missile flight-testing, proxy testing of DPRK systems in Iran, and data exchanges," the report said. "Proxy testing in Iran of jointly developed missiles allowed DPRK to avoid sanctions after the September 1999 missile test moratorium while continuing its missile advances."

The report said the Damascus-Pyongyang alliance has spread to Syria and Hizbullah. This has included North Korean construction of an alleged plutonium production plant in Syria as well as constructing tunnels for Hizbullah in southern Lebanon.

"The three top Hizbullah officials who received training in DPRK are Hassan Nasrallah, Hizbullah's secretary general and the head of the Hizbullah military organization; Ibrahim Akil, head of Hizbullah's security and intelligence service; and Mustapha Badreddine, Hizbullah's counter-espionage chief," the report said.

See also: North Korea and weapons of mass destruction

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Michael Savage's ties to Robert Kennedy - A Balanced List

Wednesday May 5, 2010 marks the 1 year anniversary of Michael Savage's ban from Britain. Why was Michael Savage, an American radio talk show host, placed on an exclusion list of murderers and terrorists banned from entering the United Kingdom? According to Michael's book Banned In Britain, page 13- the British Home Office, the British Foreign Secretary and the British Prime Minister himself wanted Michael Savage on the banned list for "balance".
One email, sent on November 27, 2008 from a Home Office official, said clearly why:  "I can understand that disclosure of the decision would help provide a balance of types of exclusion cases."  Another document said, "We will want to ensure that the names disclosed reflect the broad range of cases and are not all Islamic extremists.  Otherwise the exercise could play into the hands of radicals who allege falsely that the unacceptable behaviours policy is targeted specifically at the Muslim community."
Interestingly enough, W. Cleon Skousen wrote of a similar list in his book The Naked Capitalist which was published in 1970.  According to The Naked Capitalist, pages 92-95.
The Reuther Memorandum (circa 1961)-

A solid front of pro-American anti-Communists had begun to emerge from among America's long-suffering silent majority... In response to this rise, the Reuther brothers recommended five tactical maneuvers in an extensive memorandum to the Attorney General, Robert Kennedy...  which turned out to be temporarily devastating to the grass-roots (pro-American, anti-Communist) movement:

1.  Muzzle the military by having all speeches cleared through a military and State Department censuring committee.

2.  Use every means possible to stop the flow of funds to conservative organizations.  Use Internal Revenue to investigate conservative organizations and remove their tax-exemption where possible.

3.  Use the power of the FCC to regulate (eliminate) conservative programs.

4.  Have conservative organizations placed on the Attorney General's "Subversive Organizations" list in order to provide a "balanced list."

5.  Curb the activities of J. Edgar Hoover who "exaggerates the domestic Communist menace... and contributes to the public's frame of mind."

Walter Reuther and his brother, Victor, used to write back from Russia during their training days: "Carry on the fight for a Soviet America!".
It seems that Michael Savage is the victim of a 49 year old play from a communist influenced play-book.  But now, think about it- aren't we all?

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Michael Savage interviews Jimmy of New York - 4/16/2010

Savage Nation audio clip linked HERE.  Clip outline, discussion links and transcript below.

0:00 - Savage discusses with caller Donald our President's new plan to outsource NASA operations and rely on Russia for space travel.

Discussion links- U.S. Government Space Plans: CBS News, redOrbit News,
The Hill.com: NASA budget cuts will help China beat U.S.

1:02 - Savage praises Jimmy of New York and asks him to call in with and update.

2:00 - Caller Daniel says he believes Obama is working against the interests of the United States. 

Daniel believes that Obama is going against U.S. army and forces that may stand up to him – Daniel says Obama is trying to neutralize intellectuals.

Savage:  (Obama is) not acting alone - powerful forces are behind him

Daniel:  People in this country do not understand because this has never happened here - and the press is unwilling to acknowledge or stand up to this new American threat

3:33 – Savage: What are the implications to our national security?  Reducing nuclear arsenal by 30%.  Who benefits?  Is privatizing NASA and giving Russia an advantage in our space shuttle program good for national defense?

Discussion links – Reduction in nuclear arsenal: globalpost, Newsmax

4:03 - Caller Cameron, praises Savage for crediting Jimmy from Brooklyn

Savage: "Jimmy was right.  I don’t care who says it.  Whoever is right is right.  Whoever is wrong is wrong".

Cameron:  The people pulling the strings are very powerful.  This didn't happen overnight.  This has been planned for a long time…  The work is done before the button is pushed.

7:48 - GE paid no U.S. income tax last year.  When international operations netted 10B profit.  Savage calls it “Obama incorporated”. 
Discussion links – GE paid no income tax: CNN Money, ABC News

9:48 - Jimmy calls in and is interviewed by Savage.

Jimmy: “I’ve been studying for years”…  the communist press has been saying for years- they want to defund the American military - the way to do it - promote government jobs, job programs and government healthcare - that's going to cost so much, the only place to cut is the U.S. military budget and that's what is happening now.

Discussion links – Defense Cuts: 
The Washington Times: Obama budget cuts target military funding
FrontPage Magazine:  Obama's 2010 Defense Budget

Jimmy: The same communist press talked about - they want to put the U.S. automobile industry out of business through high prices and high cost - they don't want it privately run - then when it goes out of business it will be government run and worker controlled and that's kind of been achieved now.

The enemy makes long-range plans and they stick to it - they have minor setbacks here and there just like if we defeat Obama in the next election...

Savage: So how can Obama get away with taking apart our nuclear arsenal and NASA in one week and there is no outcry across the land?

Jimmy: Because the KGB told us we won the cold war, and that put everybody to sleep to the Marxist revolution, and people just don't want to believe the horrible.  He seems like a nice man, he's got two of the sweetest looking children...

Discussion links – The Perestroika Deception:
American Thinker:  Did Communism Fake Its Own Death in 1991?
American Thinker:  The Perestroika Deception

Savage:  Jimmy stay on the line because I think this is going to become your moment on the Savage Nation...  Break

11:06 – The New York Times says 52% of Americans think Obama is moving the U.S. towards Socialism.

Discussion links – U.S. Socialism
CNS News:  NYT/CBS Poll: 52% Say Obama Moving America Towards Socialism
NY Times: Poll
The Reader’s Digest condensed version of The Road to Serfdom
Photo Credit:  Gage Skidmore

12:26 - Back to Jimmy

Savage:  So you have been alleging for years now... Since 2000, that Islamic terrorism was being run by the KGB- wasn't that you allegation?

Jimmy: Most of it- yes.  Most of it.  We know that Gulbuddin Hekmatyar one of the top terror leaders in Afghanistan now was a soviet agent and he got the bulk of the CIA aid during the soviet war.

Discussion links – Afghanistan, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the CIA and Soviet Agents
AlterNet: Tom Hanks Tells Hollywood Whopper in 'Charlie Wilson's War'
It was Gulbaddin Hekmatyar who turned Kabul to rubble -- not the Soviets and not the Taliban. Gulbaddin Hekmatyar regularly rocketed his own capitol during his term of office as prime minister. Hekmatyar is renowned for having killed more Afghans than Soviets. He so habitually attacked his mujahiddin allies that many people suspected he was actually a Soviet agent.
The Real Charlie Wilson
Leaders of Afghanistan
ZNet: The U.S. and Afghan Tragedy
CRS:  U.S.-China Counterterrorism Cooperation: Issues for U.S. Policy
MEI Policy Brief – From Identity Crisis to Identity in Crisis in Afghanistan
WikiQuote: Charlie Wilson’s War

Jimmy:  Soviet press did an interview with the leader of the Communist party in Lebanon and they take credit for chasing the U.S. Marines out of Lebanon when we hear it was the Muslim terror bombing of the marine barracks.

Discussion links – Communists in Lebanon
…This IIA is Classified as Stated.  Leftist Lebanese factional leaders hope to use Moscow's Increased interest in Lebanon to bolster their own power. Host take their direction from Damascus, however, and will consult the Syrians about greater cooperation with the Soviets. Lebanese governmental leaders probably will carefully respond to Soviet overtures for fear Christian backlash, and because they understand that Soviet freedom of action and leverage are distinctly limited.…More Active Soviet Role  …Moscow's long-term objective may be the establishment of leftist, pro-Soviet regime In Lebanon
The Regan DoctrineReagan believed that it was necessary for the United States to combat the spread of Soviet-backed Marxist and leftist regimes throughout the globe.
Lebanese Communist Party: Wikipedia
1983 Beirut barracks bombing: Wikipedia
Alternative Insight:  The Tragic U.S. Policies in Iraq and Afghanistan- True to Form

Jimmy:  It’s the Soviet hand in the Muslim glove.

The same way the communists penetrated Christianity- that's liberation theology.  Most people now know liberation theology.  Well the same way the communists penetrated the Christian religion, they penetrated Islam.  They find the most radical crazy strain and promote it against the West.

The goal is to bypass mutual assured destruction.   If Russia can't shoot us we can't shoot them. Therefore their weapons are neutralized.  But if they can put their weapons in other countries - well that’s mutually assured destruction too - well no, not if that country is run by a suicide bomber type. 

The soviets are outplaying us. They had a bad hand because their economy was weak so they faked the collapse.  They made capitalism then have to rebuild their economy.  And, if it doesn't work - capitalism is discredited.  

But at the same time, under the guise of collapse, they claim they are losing their nukes. They claim they are losing their nuclear scientists.  Well they are not losing them to Japan; they are losing them to the radical Muslim states.

It’s a trick- I said it before it happened.  It's obvious if you study it.

Savage:  Let's say you are a man ahead of your time…  Lets go down this road together. 

Russia has decided to help Iran, China has just decided to send (refined) oil to Iran - that means Israel is out and Iran is in.  Is that correct? 

Jimmy:  Right - and remember is was communists that helped topple the Shah.  It wasn't just the people in Iran who wanted the Shah out.  The soviets targeted him. And the Shah himself, when he was still in power, warned about the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) in Washington working to topple him.  That is an extremely powerful KGB front group. The (IPS) is dismantling us (The United States).  They influence our media, they influence our politicians. The House Progressive Caucus is like the political arm for the Institute for Policy Studies.  They have meetings they have connections.

Savage: Who is in the House Progressive Caucus? Barbara Lee of course. Who else?

Jimmy: Pelosi was one of the leaders…  Marxist congresswoman Maxine Waters wanted to nationalize our energy industry.

Discussion Links – Institute for Policy Studies
1977 profile on IPS by The Heritage Foundation (critical)
Note- the link above is broken. I'm looking for the 1977 profile. Contact me if you can find it.
DISCOVERTHENETWORKS.ORG - Institute For Policy Studies (IPS)

Savage:  Let's start at the crux of the entire world right now, which is Israel.  Whether people know it or not, Israel is at the crossroads of the future of the world.  That is both Biblically and politically true.  What's going to happen in the Middle East in your opinion?

Jimmy: America is always the ultimate target.  Israel looks like the target now but remember Israel, according to the radical Muslims, is the little Satan.  America is the big Satan. Just like the Soviets referred to America as enemy number one.  I've suggested some things that could happen.

The soviets or the Muslim terror groups could lure hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops there and then they could be slaughtered with weapons of mass destruction.  That didn't happen in Iraq but that's something still of potential.  America is the target- not Israel. 

Savage:  I know who the target is.  But what do you think will happen with regard to Israel?  Israel could defy all of the world order, could it not? 

Jimmy:  I think they have to.  I really think they have to.  Somebody has to stop Iran.  Iran has to be stopped - their nuclear program.  But its also if we stop it, we still have to know who is behind it and what the goals were.

Savage:  Why would Russia and China back Iran?  What do they gain by backing Iran? 

Jimmy:  Well they gain in the third world.  They look like they are helping the non-whites against the white capitalists.  They also look like they are helping the third world.  They have long-term connections, the communists. Russia and China are partners.  There has been no real split after Stalin died.  That split has healed.  They kept the illusion of a split so they can have a two-way war against us.  And we don't understand it.  And they are working with radical Islam, the same way they got into Christianity.

Savage:  Do you actually believe Obama is a secret plant?  Sort of a secret agent sleeper?  What do you actually think?

Jimmy:  Well its really not too secret but- at one time the communist movement was a party movement; everybody was somewhere connected to the party some how.  Today the movement is so huge; you don't have to be connected knowingly to any communist party member.  There are millions and millions of Marxists now because they were being brainwashed in schools unopposed.  Very few people, David Horowitz was trying to point it out.  A few people here and there, I mean, they have Marxist Scholars Conferences, Socialist World Scholars Conferences… These people meet, they strategize, they coordinate and they are all going in the same direction.

Savage:  So are you saying we are finished, are you saying they won and it’s over?  The chess game is over?

Jimmy:  We're not in checkmate yet but they are heading toward that.

Savage:  What do you mean we are not in checkmate yet?  The defense secretary William Gates just the other day said it is wonderful to cut the nukes by 30%.  Everywhere you turn, he's a rubber stamp for Obama.  He's never said one word that Obama hasn't agreed with.  Or, shall I put it the other way- whatever Obama does, Robert Gates checks and says yes.

Jimmy:  Well it looks like mass insanity.  But what the end result is going to be- we are going to have to rely on the United Nations for control...  And that's what some of these people behind the scenes are after- they want world government.  Now, I have only studied really the communist part of the movement but there are other parts of the movement for world government.  And if you take away the threat, the fear of the communist world movement, that means that those people then unite with the world socialists and the other globalists.

Savage:  Poll- 52% Obama moving America to socialism - that's astonishing Jimmy.

Jimmy:  Yeah but see some people don't mind it, in other words, its a bad thing to you and me and your listeners.  But other people - that's not a negative.  It’s like pointing out someone is a communist.  That no longer has the negative stigma it used to and should still have.

Did you see the New York post the other day?  Arthur Herman had an editorial. The Bear is Back.  He says anyone who imagined we won the cold war had better think again.

Savage:  So its almost as though the New York Times and CBS are boasting about it  - its almost as though they are trying to expose or out the whole socialist movement in the USA because they agree with it.

Jimmy:  That's right.  Remember The Times supported Stalin. They actually had a secret agreement with Stalin to not do any negative reporting on what's going on in the Soviet Union.  So they covered up.

Savage:  But wait a minute there is no difference between what the Times did with Stalin and what that Nobel prize winning putz Friedman, or if he ever won one, had the audacity three weeks ago to give a speech where he said our system is a cumbersome inefficient system in times of crisis… we should have a ruling elite which gives us guidelines on what we should do - don't you remember that?  I was shocked by this. 

Jimmy:  That is exactly what the communists say.  Ralph Peters the other day said we are playing checkers and our enemies are playing chess.

Savage:  I know, that’s an old one.  Ralph does very good work and I don't want to negate him in any way.  But let's go back to this again.  Look what I just said.  Look what just came up- the fact of the matter is The New York Times now has columnists who are glorifying Communist China and getting away with it as though this is perfectly normal to do. 

Jimmy:  They said Mao was an agrarian reformer, a Chinese George Washington.  They said the same thing about Castro they said that about Daniel Ortega.  The old grey lady is a slut and she has a lot of blood on her hands.

Savage:  On her skirts, yeah, let's leave it at that…  Jimmy, before you go, you said something earlier - Institute of Policy Studies- who is that who runs that?

Jimmy:  That was set up in the early mid sixties by a Russian communist who came to America.   He used to own Fabergé cosmetics.  He sold it and with that money they used to found it - Fabergé cosmetics is a fine company.  But I'm saying in the past.

It’s a known KGB front group.  The FBI had files on it they are so powerful they took the FBI to court and the FBI had to destroy their files on the IPS.

Savage:  Whose running it today?

Jimmy:  I'm not sure the names, if you want specific names of who’s actually in charge today.   But it used to be Cora Weiss, it used to be Samuel Rubin, The Rubin Foundation, there are a lot of new names now, its like a cancer.  It metastasizes; it has a lot of spin-offs.

Discussion Links – The IPS and the Rubin Foundation

Savage:  Why don't these people realize what happens when communism takes over, don't they understand what happens to them? 

Jimmy:  Well the leaders want that, the leaders want that because they think they will be in charge, but there's a lot of useful idiots there.

Savage:  But don't they understand they are not going to be in charge.  Usually they eat their own and usually they arrest and assassinate their own friends right off the bat because they are the only ones that could actually expose them for what they are? 

Take a look at what Castro did after he came to power with the people’s revolution.  He arrested and imprisoned several thousand of his own compares.  Some of whom are still rotting in prison.

Jimmy:  That's true.  Listen there's a great book that was written on the Institute for Policy Studies.  It was called Covert Cadre.  It has pictures of the KGB agents inside and has a diagram showing the spin-off groups.  They are immensely powerful and they work directly with terrorists and they don't even hide the facts.

Savage:  How are going to come back from this?  Its only 1-year and a few months into this Marxist regime. The capo of this regime is drunk with his power.  He knows no limits.  When is this man going to be stopped and how can he be stopped by a democratic process?  Can it still work?  Can a democratic process still rein this man in before we reach a tipping point, before it is too late to go back? 

Jimmy: We are going to need the Democrat Congressmen and Senators - even if they are leftists.  If they are not communist.  If they can be woken up to the communist threat.

Savage:  Isn't that what I just said two weeks ago?  That only the democrat party can stop this man.  When even they come to realize how dangerously out of control he is and where he is taking the country. Doesn't Biden know?  I don't think Biden knows anything I think he's actually kind of a nice dumb guy who doesn't know what's going on around him.

Jimmy:  I think you are right on that, but it’s going to take the people to wake up and they are going to have to understand.

Savage:  Who in the democrat party is not a Communist Marxist Leninist?  Who in the party is a centrist Democrat anymore?

Jimmy:  Probably some of the southern ones.  Probably some here and there.  I mean Mayor Koch was a liberal but was a loyal American.  There are some people like that who can't believe what happened or don't understand it.  But they are going to have to take back the Democrat party.  The American people are going to have to penetrate the American government.  The American people are going to have to penetrate the media, the school boards, the teachers unions.  We are going to have to take it back.  The tea party movement looks good but it has to become an anti-communist movement too.

Savage:  Before we go on to the tea party movement, what is going on right now is a classical communist operation where they penetrate a group and they send in agent provocateurs to say the n-word  or to commit some kind of violence and they discredit the organization or the movement itself.  That's exactly what they are doing right now but they are doing it nakedly.

Jimmy:  Its called discredit from within. It’s taught in communist party training schools.

Savage:  That's exactly right and that's exactly what the democrat party itself has become. It’s a communist front group onto itself…  End of interview.  Break.

26:20 – Obama the Space Cadet…  It as though we are watching a revolution occur in front of our eyes and only a few of us see it’s going on… 

Savage:  I'm telling you something is wrong here. 

27:40 - Savage goes on to cover the Arthur Herman editorial- The Bear is Back.

Additional Links:

Clips of Jimmy's most recent appearances on Savage
Jimmy of New York on Savage 3/31/2010
Jimmy of New York on Savage 2/25/2010